From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7C7C433F5 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D4C161039 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 18:17:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S238593AbhJ0SUX (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:20:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40630 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231232AbhJ0SUX (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2021 14:20:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1036.google.com (mail-pj1-x1036.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1036]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB7E0C061570; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1036.google.com with SMTP id oa4so2696672pjb.2; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=k+J8bFq2fo19uN4FjC4jMXaiLDf48GwgQzg1X0SlSu4=; b=BE/HhNsn0w+Ww7jLgz4xRgpW9aInj1fztmrdwk1POIisOyLzN7gya2a50ZELhfZcSk z4pTZhVrbSlF4WlNNR/cPozj3cApO1O14AEm97sxxI2l/vKhzBhHAR160MvoW1DIqlmH w9qD3OV5Ud3m5MEIcU/V4PGTsAYb/bnVhb9vgk3pShXxPMa06OicKhim5MiCFVnBHk1q OgcTd3X0UGaJbmqGwNpbTIEdbG4nfy3yRJekS6E7fPn6yfQOLnFjNIaoNpAlLne1qei9 Q2N5lFLiC2eGoKGaJyPjc1zru2vFok5Tqdc4425gMU8sa8YIXeJ5VhNCh7EUokeSqiaV SVow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=k+J8bFq2fo19uN4FjC4jMXaiLDf48GwgQzg1X0SlSu4=; b=hf0MgVBXJoBg2/6tZc3nShJxEx9OVf+cAn89iEsedE15m0Yh7Qzqr0UX+JwKu9PB65 xnCPDWyVD95/7RHug76fCN4y1AOSI/zIve0c2nXGuol6JQOKWhDArtm64JlFmjYRuJBH SzXBVMCB+tMb+ohF9bNzdRywlBdKaB10fJE3MPY3rSKZ3iNi/OGAm9qZ8ze86SH0oNuX 8KaF+YEti5wsIw9k301qEW8FKY1wTYoXvMARYD99SiqkwICkJSAHUGwhBbxLF298xqDm vP9N29F2v4nl93c+vgIOOuT9A8dDXWPegWnVMBAKwjRhQ6sisRFKZ0ed0Tso0Mc4L58L sJ1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531G0U3slwahfM7mvZpBdh4xHKEnH6Eus0oIKVSr41W4YWb11rj1 Xxze/iKrDoqOupUUuu+laHmIjGJ0K+cMjbAlqZ/mKfi7 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzT8SjZaK3s0eKyVWEHZqAUQ6D3Brfwkmd97BuTjaciNwnx00I86MQmhA/moaHEjMiIbnJzOthg++Dj0+PQVAo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ea09:b0:13f:ac2:c5ae with SMTP id s9-20020a170902ea0900b0013f0ac2c5aemr29659450plg.3.1635358677198; Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:17:57 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211026214133.3114279-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20211026214133.3114279-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com> From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 11:17:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 bpf-next 0/3] bpf: use 32bit safe version of u64_stats To: Eric Dumazet Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , "David S . Miller" , netdev , Eric Dumazet , bpf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 2:41 PM Eric Dumazet wrote: > > From: Eric Dumazet > > Two first patches fix bugs added in 5.1 and 5.5 > > Third patch replaces the u64 fields in struct bpf_prog_stats > with u64_stats_t ones to avoid possible sampling errors, > in case of load/store stearing. Applied to bpf-next. Thanks!