From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 10:32:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQL0tnF+8Wch1Uq3nH3Bi+Ogo2uK4gqY46o7E4A+Dx+Mhg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YXkVGSG3BkMUEaKH@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 2:02 AM Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 02:05:55PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > Please post it. CI cannot pull it from the repo.
>
> Done:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211027085243.008677168@infradead.org/T/#t
Perfect. Thanks!
Looks like vger got into 'delete all users' mode.
Looks like my and many other emails were automatically unsubscribed
from many mailing lists.
bpf@vger, netdev@vger, linux-kernel@vger user count looks very low
compared to a few weeks ago.
I doubt all these users decided to unsubscribe themselves.
Anyway looks like BPF CI doesn't see the patchset yet for some reason
(we're debugging),
but I've tested your patchset manually the same way CI would do
and reviewed most of the patches.
Please add:
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
to bpf patches 16 and 17
and
Tested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
for the whole set.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-27 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-26 12:01 [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] objtool: Classify symbols Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-28 3:58 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] objtool: Explicitly avoid self modifying code in .altinstr_replacement Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-28 4:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] objtool: Shrink struct instruction Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] objtool,x86: Replace alternatives with .retpoline_sites Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] x86/retpoline: Remove unused replacement symbols Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] x86/asm: Fix register order Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] x86/asm: Fixup odd GEN-for-each-reg.h usage Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] x86/retpoline: Move the retpoline thunk declarations to nospec-branch.h Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] x86/retpoline: Create a retpoline thunk array Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] x86/alternative: Implement .retpoline_sites support Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-27 17:38 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-27 19:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] x86/alternative: Handle Jcc __x86_indirect_thunk_\reg Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-28 9:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] x86/alternative: Try inline spectre_v2=retpoline,amd Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] x86/alternative: Add debug prints to apply_retpolines() Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] x86,bugs: Unconditionally allow spectre_v2=retpoline,amd Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] bpf, x86: Simplify computing label offsets Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 12:01 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] bpf,x86: Respect X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE* Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 18:26 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] x86: Rewrite the retpoline rewrite logic Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-26 18:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 20:00 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-26 21:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-26 21:05 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-10-27 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-10-27 17:32 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2021-10-28 5:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-10-28 17:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2021-10-29 12:43 ` Miroslav Benes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAADnVQL0tnF+8Wch1Uq3nH3Bi+Ogo2uK4gqY46o7E4A+Dx+Mhg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).