From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4858CC433E0 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:48:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F116464E4F for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 17:48:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231627AbhBCRsK (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:48:10 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41656 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232130AbhBCRsE (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:48:04 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3412C061788 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:47:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id a17so76928ljq.2 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:47:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0Sd7lpuzzYzAe84omnrWYz0GYPR/9/jZDwcpOZKoCos=; b=rAHCkrSCSvsO3i942zxFGAk0xb59fBgQ9tJbci20Qr8DGAfbkfFqUS0o0lV+OAJMgn JOSqWMGKZzFwQMVac947lcIMwL6Tc5F0tVcjRhUHs9tzA6STcT7JKCU3wT2IirVckFFg v7A4WB7VsSJXr/haxcAPud+QTaGWwMHaudZig= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0Sd7lpuzzYzAe84omnrWYz0GYPR/9/jZDwcpOZKoCos=; b=tLJIibUiP/FY0sa4JomQ63Le1M2qtAsXp0OJzSi01DpQZB4LRkX9etvSZY5vTTX/P/ dC8KEasQJTyZnf1XCUo3DPLJP98XSENLHHkQxf+ZNB8tdPXIu55zkuUh+JSBSZTxITPx jRKfux32PNrfMdf4Vu/uqxdgiMHoOSSUOYzDhMs5iHedhCWrwKu6XjC78WpryHF5eOX3 c1aqstb1BeMZ/aYfYmTgK3HPzm/8pmCH3LpkYNB9dr8ttWokUj1ps64d9RMBAsNNMqcs Zs9tjSgi/cSt/m5a3Dv5fYHZVS+b319PYD1vEQ/jDYIV32Pa4MwNENsiyz3h8CoOqWoH 1oRw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532fJVwuwDN7ezApKIsjrC1tNLB7klj+fw44ybT2/a1pBTpI5ono kOdwYMOLTa5ohBNyzhqlrSR4YfxsAFGhHVYtGP3FAQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdVb3Jed1F5NgGdDtfAd5oNibLzyOzFOWG4eVNHu9dYMCxEE44x+nn5372HQ8P/nr1dxBBfvSeiQCWg8NBeQU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9cc8:: with SMTP id g8mr2376414ljj.479.1612374426835; Wed, 03 Feb 2021 09:47:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Ivan Babrou Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 09:46:55 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in unwind_next_frame+0x1df5/0x2650 To: Peter Zijlstra Cc: kernel-team , Ignat Korchagin , Hailong liu , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrew Morton , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , Josh Poimboeuf , Miroslav Benes , Julien Thierry , Jiri Slaby , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel , Alasdair Kergon , Mike Snitzer , dm-devel@redhat.com, "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , John Fastabend , KP Singh , Robert Richter , "Joel Fernandes (Google)" , Mathieu Desnoyers , Linux Kernel Network Developers , bpf@vger.kernel.org, Alexey Kardashevskiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org > Can you pretty please not line-wrap console output? It's unreadable. GMail doesn't make it easy, I'll send a link to a pastebin next time. Let me know if you'd like me to regenerate the decoded stack. > > edfd9b7838ba5e47f19ad8466d0565aba5c59bf0 is the first bad commit > > commit edfd9b7838ba5e47f19ad8466d0565aba5c59bf0 > > Not sure what tree you're on, but that's not the upstream commit. I mentioned that it's a rebased core-static_call-2020-10-12 tag and added a link to the upstream hash right below. > > Author: Steven Rostedt (VMware) > > Date: Tue Aug 18 15:57:52 2020 +0200 > > > > tracepoint: Optimize using static_call() > > > > There's a known issue with that patch, can you try: > > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210202220121.435051654@goodmis.org I've tried it on top of core-static_call-2020-10-12 tag rebased on top of v5.9 (to make it reproducible), and the patch did not help. Do I need to apply the whole series or something else?