From: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
Marek Majkowski <marek@cloudflare.com>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/9] xdp: Add new xdp_chain_map type for specifying XDP call sequences
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 16:50:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACAyw9-u7oAmC1F4rW8wH2a2aoxrDHCENcM4j5WmriS7YLmevQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <157002302672.1302756.10579143571088111093.stgit@alrua-x1>
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 14:30, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> index 113e1286e184..ab855095c830 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> @@ -1510,3 +1510,156 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops htab_of_maps_map_ops = {
> .map_gen_lookup = htab_of_map_gen_lookup,
> .map_check_btf = map_check_no_btf,
> };
> +
> +struct xdp_chain_table {
> + struct bpf_prog *wildcard_act;
> + struct bpf_prog *act[XDP_ACT_MAX];
> +};
> +
> +static int xdp_chain_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
> +{
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct xdp_chain_table) / sizeof(void *) !=
> + sizeof(struct xdp_chain_acts) / sizeof(u32));
> +
> + if (attr->key_size != sizeof(u32) ||
> + attr->value_size != sizeof(struct xdp_chain_acts))
> + return -EINVAL;
How are we going to extend xdp_chain_acts if a new XDP action is introduced?
> +
> + attr->value_size = sizeof(struct xdp_chain_table);
> + return htab_map_alloc_check(attr);
> +}
> +
> +struct bpf_prog *bpf_xdp_chain_map_get_prog(struct bpf_map *map,
> + u32 prev_id,
> + enum xdp_action action)
> +{
> + struct xdp_chain_table *tab;
> + void *ptr;
> +
> + ptr = htab_map_lookup_elem(map, &prev_id);
> +
> + if (!ptr)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + tab = READ_ONCE(ptr);
> + return tab->act[action - 1] ?: tab->wildcard_act;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bpf_xdp_chain_map_get_prog);
> +
> +/* only called from syscall */
> +int bpf_xdp_chain_map_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value)
> +{
> + struct xdp_chain_acts *act = value;
> + struct xdp_chain_table *tab;
> + void *ptr;
> + u32 *cur;
> + int i;
> +
> + ptr = htab_map_lookup_elem(map, key);
> + if (!ptr)
> + return -ENOENT;
> +
> + tab = READ_ONCE(ptr);
> +
> + if (tab->wildcard_act)
> + act->wildcard_act = tab->wildcard_act->aux->id;
> +
> + cur = &act->drop_act;
> + for (i = 0; i < XDP_ACT_MAX; i++, cur++)
> + if(tab->act[i])
> + *cur = tab->act[i]->aux->id;
For completeness, zero out *cur in the else case?
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void *xdp_chain_map_get_ptr(int fd)
> +{
> + struct bpf_prog *prog = bpf_prog_get(fd);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(prog))
> + return prog;
> +
> + if (prog->type != BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP ||
> + bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux)) {
> + bpf_prog_put(prog);
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + }
> +
> + return prog;
> +}
> +
> +static void xdp_chain_map_put_ptrs(void *value)
> +{
> + struct xdp_chain_table *tab = value;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < XDP_ACT_MAX; i++)
> + if (tab->act[i])
> + bpf_prog_put(tab->act[i]);
> +
> + if (tab->wildcard_act)
> + bpf_prog_put(tab->wildcard_act);
> +}
> +
> +/* only called from syscall */
> +int bpf_xdp_chain_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *value,
> + u64 map_flags)
Nit: check that map_flags == 0
> +{
> + struct xdp_chain_acts *act = value;
> + struct xdp_chain_table tab = {};
> + u32 lookup_key = *((u32*)key);
> + u32 *cur = &act->drop_act;
> + bool found_val = false;
> + int ret, i;
> + void *ptr;
> +
> + if (!lookup_key)
> + return -EINVAL;
Is it possible to check that this is a valid prog id / fd or whatever it is?
> +
> + if (act->wildcard_act) {
If this is an fd, 0 is a valid value no?
> + ptr = xdp_chain_map_get_ptr(act->wildcard_act);
> + if (IS_ERR(ptr))
> + return PTR_ERR(ptr);
> + tab.wildcard_act = ptr;
> + found_val = true;
> + }
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < XDP_ACT_MAX; i++, cur++) {
> + if (*cur) {
> + ptr = xdp_chain_map_get_ptr(*cur);
> + if (IS_ERR(ptr)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(ptr);
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> + tab.act[i] = ptr;
> + found_val = true;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!found_val) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_err;
> + }
> +
> + ret = htab_map_update_elem(map, key, &tab, map_flags);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_err;
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +out_err:
> + xdp_chain_map_put_ptrs(&tab);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +
> +const struct bpf_map_ops xdp_chain_map_ops = {
> + .map_alloc_check = xdp_chain_map_alloc_check,
> + .map_alloc = htab_map_alloc,
> + .map_free = fd_htab_map_free,
> + .map_get_next_key = htab_map_get_next_key,
> + .map_delete_elem = htab_map_delete_elem,
> + .map_fd_put_value = xdp_chain_map_put_ptrs,
> + .map_check_btf = map_check_no_btf,
> +};
--
Lorenz Bauer | Systems Engineer
6th Floor, County Hall/The Riverside Building, SE1 7PB, UK
www.cloudflare.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-02 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-02 13:30 [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] xdp: Support multiple programs on a single interface through chain calls Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/9] hashtab: Add new bpf_map_fd_put_value op Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/9] xdp: Add new xdp_chain_map type for specifying XDP call sequences Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 15:50 ` Lorenz Bauer [this message]
2019-10-02 18:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/9] xdp: Support setting and getting device chain map Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 15:50 ` Lorenz Bauer
2019-10-02 18:32 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 18:07 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-02 18:29 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/9] xdp: Implement chain call logic to support multiple programs on one interface Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 17:33 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-02 17:53 ` kbuild test robot
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/9] tools/include/uapi: Add XDP chain map definitions Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 6/9] tools/libbpf_probes: Add support for xdp_chain map type Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 7/9] bpftool: Add definitions " Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 8/9] libbpf: Add support for setting and getting XDP chain maps Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 13:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 9/9] selftests: Add tests for XDP chain calls Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 15:10 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/9] xdp: Support multiple programs on a single interface through " Alan Maguire
2019-10-02 15:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 16:34 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-02 18:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 20:34 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-03 7:48 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-03 10:09 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-10-03 19:45 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-02 16:35 ` Lorenz Bauer
2019-10-02 18:54 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 16:43 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-02 19:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 19:15 ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-10-02 19:29 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 19:46 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-03 7:58 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 18:38 ` Song Liu
2019-10-02 18:54 ` Song Liu
2019-10-02 19:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-03 8:53 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-10-03 14:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-03 14:33 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-03 14:53 ` Edward Cree
2019-10-03 18:49 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-10-03 19:35 ` John Fastabend
2019-10-04 8:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-04 10:34 ` Edward Cree
2019-10-04 15:58 ` Lorenz Bauer
2019-10-07 16:43 ` Edward Cree
2019-10-07 17:12 ` Lorenz Bauer
2019-10-07 19:21 ` Edward Cree
2019-10-07 21:01 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-02 19:23 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-10-02 19:49 ` Song Liu
2019-10-03 7:59 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACAyw9-u7oAmC1F4rW8wH2a2aoxrDHCENcM4j5WmriS7YLmevQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=marek@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).