bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] bpf: Implement task local storage
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2020 00:54:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACYkzJ79KVG6-W3ChGUC-AX8iU4Qt9gA=D2ht6UU+XThC5yJ2w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5563E63-BA82-4D15-8480-354FA733ED43@fb.com>

On Wed, Nov 4, 2020 at 12:47 AM Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 3, 2020, at 7:31 AM, KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> >
> > Similar to bpf_local_storage for sockets and inodes add local storage
> > for task_struct.
> >
> > The life-cycle of storage is managed with the life-cycle of the
> > task_struct.  i.e. the storage is destroyed along with the owning task
> > with a callback to the bpf_task_storage_free from the task_free LSM
> > hook.
> >
> > The BPF LSM allocates an __rcu pointer to the bpf_local_storage in
> > the security blob which are now stackable and can co-exist with other
> > LSMs.
> >
> > The userspace map operations can be done by using a pid fd as a key
> > passed to the lookup, update and delete operations.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>
> with a few nits:
>
> > ---
> > include/linux/bpf_lsm.h        |  23 +++
> > include/linux/bpf_types.h      |   1 +
> > include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  39 ++++
> > kernel/bpf/Makefile            |   1 +
> > kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c           |   4 +
> > kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c  | 313 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > kernel/bpf/syscall.c           |   3 +-
> > kernel/bpf/verifier.c          |  10 ++
> > security/bpf/hooks.c           |   2 +
> > tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  39 ++++
> > 10 files changed, 434 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > create mode 100644 kernel/bpf/bpf_task_storage.c
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> > index aaacb6aafc87..326cb68a3632 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > #ifndef _LINUX_BPF_LSM_H
> > #define _LINUX_BPF_LSM_H
> >
> > +#include "linux/sched.h"
>
> vscode?

Yep, turns out it was clangd (which I use in vscode) and I needed to
pass "--header-insertion=never"
when starting the clangd server, I fixed all other instances as well.

- KP

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-03 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-03 15:31 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/8] Implement task_local_storage KP Singh
2020-11-03 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/8] bpf: Implement task local storage KP Singh
2020-11-03 23:47   ` Song Liu
2020-11-03 23:54     ` KP Singh [this message]
2020-11-03 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/8] libbpf: Add support for " KP Singh
2020-11-03 19:28   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-11-03 20:28     ` KP Singh
2020-11-03 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/8] bpftool: " KP Singh
2020-11-03 23:50   ` Song Liu
2020-11-03 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/8] bpf: Implement get_current_task_btf and RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID KP Singh
2020-11-03 23:57   ` Song Liu
2020-11-03 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 5/8] bpf: Fix tests for local_storage KP Singh
2020-11-04  0:16   ` Song Liu
2020-11-03 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/8] bpf: Update selftests for local_storage to use vmlinux.h KP Singh
2020-11-04  0:16   ` Song Liu
2020-11-03 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 7/8] bpf: Add tests for task_local_storage KP Singh
2020-11-03 18:47   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-03 18:59     ` KP Singh
2020-11-04  0:05       ` KP Singh
2020-11-04  1:27         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-04  1:55           ` KP Singh
2020-11-04  1:57             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-11-04  6:51               ` John Fastabend
2020-11-04 11:03                 ` KP Singh
2020-11-04 11:11                   ` KP Singh
2020-11-03 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 8/8] bpf: Exercise syscall operations for inode and sk storage KP Singh
2020-11-03 22:32   ` Song Liu
2020-11-03 22:58     ` KP Singh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CACYkzJ79KVG6-W3ChGUC-AX8iU4Qt9gA=D2ht6UU+XThC5yJ2w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=kpsingh@chromium.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).