From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9BDC17444 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 09:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7B521D7B for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 09:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="rFUVjZIE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726723AbfKJJPg (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Nov 2019 04:15:36 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:41265 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726612AbfKJJPf (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 Nov 2019 04:15:35 -0500 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id m9so10564094ljh.8 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 01:15:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NC4UaOmYyxeIYsdJnwAcb1vsEQuxwDoopSMGqewgnV8=; b=rFUVjZIEf9PrQVws+tLtevu6eyP7v8OsQL/Q29XOm6BX84QyzqMZhrW6W0k/xeXoWo r8oqpFZfQREpK8sj3G9QVV5leWBV269iimFaEVG/T8qOQmAp86AAtx2wwnwuORA3Mw3L qYm8bFey9WLxat/L3VsWYyZxz5t4NOju6O7a/i7tsieTasaP31zUSh9+p33FC5QQ/Z8s /AIC3hqHOSh9eesW4purKkM1MfVpxBlkeZdofa3IcyFiEwNy3pzltptGlKgvJwEccnGe S8MWXxojuSkGzs/f6Lvs3k+Y1rB81USF2T3mESoh8c/KeX8I9xFgxOGgPk0yCw+1XHuB jnlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NC4UaOmYyxeIYsdJnwAcb1vsEQuxwDoopSMGqewgnV8=; b=fg6E29Op9zhilA4bqG752ONpuJ9KkBzkCmjB2E+OB9l82l2jaHTl4yslUb9KJvlEbL McdTwPpWVedcflp9heOBLxmo9TVvK2HWxnttWBUGgoV0biaMlrmpaEJ5KycDFZUEWhbY x+iL2MSV0THnPnKddNislWGAxnORTWgwuuOsJ7WzgQj2RvP9bpsyRGnYsZaSN3pXjvB4 X9Xug7BfRowxBjY7NtdrVHLuQoX8vDQLms+6+K97olVVYuoBh3xBPqfjnl6T0clolch8 hvgr2PDXH7/9kTgtCTrsdKNzU4gQ9WrWpWs7OeK1IHCuvGGj7lTymFHgSmtLEY3okgWg e98g== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUs/6pEeiJ60yYA31ZcVFxsK9CzDHKs0rCDjLu58bJfwm6VjzFV 1IyqQSR/t3ArnN5ANWb3kGbia+CR1KdqF9/jD4d0Ig== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxz55BmM0SWVm6sXfhi2GSM8RkM7Fh+UOIM9slJGxqaWfsLQAS1EULfkatYUI0DjuzroQWDufaxhHsv1EDNQzU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9b4b:: with SMTP id o11mr12505739ljj.252.1573377333791; Sun, 10 Nov 2019 01:15:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191107125224.29616-1-anders.roxell@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: From: Anders Roxell Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2019 10:15:22 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: bpf: test_lwt_ip_encap: add missing object file to TEST_FILES To: Song Liu Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , "David S . Miller" , Networking , bpf , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" , open list , Shuah Khan Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 7 Nov 2019 at 18:55, Song Liu wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 4:53 AM Anders Roxell wrote: > > > > When installing kselftests to its own directory and running the > > test_lwt_ip_encap.sh it will complain that test_lwt_ip_encap.o can't be > > find. > > > > $ ./test_lwt_ip_encap.sh > > starting egress IPv4 encap test > > Error opening object test_lwt_ip_encap.o: No such file or directory > > Object hashing failed! > > Cannot initialize ELF context! > > Failed to parse eBPF program: Invalid argument > > > > Rework to add test_lwt_ip_encap.o to TEST_FILES so the object file gets > > installed when installing kselftest. > > > > Fixes: 74b5a5968fe8 ("selftests/bpf: Replace test_progs and test_maps w/ general rule") > > Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell > > Please highlight that this set is on top of bpf-next tree with > "[PATCH bpf-next 1/2]". Oh right, I'll send out that shortly Cheers, Anders > > Otherwise, looks good to me. > > Acked-by: Song Liu