Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Add a test for attaching a bpf fentry/fexit trace to an XDP program

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Add a test for attaching a bpf fentry/fexit trace to an XDP program

[Maciej Fijalkowski]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 03:58:16PM +0000, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> Add a test that will attach a FENTRY and FEXIT program to the XDP test
> program. It will also verify data from the XDP context on FENTRY and
> verifies the return code on exit.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>   - Changed code to use the BPF skeleton
>   - Replace static volatile with global variable in eBPF code
> 
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c |   44 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e6e849df2632
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <net/if.h>
> +#include "test_xdp.skel.h"
> +#include "test_xdp_bpf2bpf.skel.h"
> +
> +void test_xdp_bpf2bpf(void)
> +{
> +
> +	struct test_xdp *pkt_skel = NULL;
> +        struct test_xdp_bpf2bpf *ftrace_skel = NULL;
> +	__u64 *ftrace_res;

Wanted to point out the RCT here but I see that
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests don't really follow that rule.

> +
> +	struct vip key4 = {.protocol = 6, .family = AF_INET};
> +	struct iptnl_info value4 = {.family = AF_INET};
> +	char buf[128];
> +	struct iphdr *iph = (void *)buf + sizeof(struct ethhdr);
> +	__u32 duration = 0, retval, size;
> +	int err, pkt_fd, map_fd;
> +
> +	/* Load XDP program to introspect */
> +	pkt_skel = test_xdp__open_and_load();
> +	if (CHECK(!pkt_skel, "pkt_skel_load", "test_xdp skeleton failed\n"))
> +		return;
> +
> +	pkt_fd = bpf_program__fd(pkt_skel->progs._xdp_tx_iptunnel);
> +
> +	map_fd = bpf_map__fd(pkt_skel->maps.vip2tnl);
> +	bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key4, &value4, 0);
> +
> +	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts,
> +			    .attach_prog_fd = pkt_fd,
> +			   );
> +
> +	ftrace_skel = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__open_opts(&opts);
> +	if (CHECK(!ftrace_skel, "__open", "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))
> +	  goto out;

Hmm do you have here mixed tabs and spaces? Maybe my client messes this
line up.

> +
> +	if (CHECK(test_xdp_bpf2bpf__load(ftrace_skel), "__load", "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))

line too long?

> +	  goto out;
> +
> +	err = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__attach(ftrace_skel);
> +	if (CHECK(err, "ftrace_attach", "ftrace attach failed: %d\n", err))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +        /* Run test program */
> +	err = bpf_prog_test_run(pkt_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
> +				buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
> +
> +	CHECK(err || retval != XDP_TX || size != 74 ||
> +	      iph->protocol != IPPROTO_IPIP, "ipv4",
> +	      "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d\n",
> +	      err, errno, retval, size);
> +
> +	/* Verify test results */
> +	ftrace_res = (__u64 *)ftrace_skel->bss;
> +
> +	if (CHECK(ftrace_res[0] != if_nametoindex("lo"), "result",
> +		  "fentry failed err %llu\n", ftrace_res[0]))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	if (CHECK(ftrace_res[1] != XDP_TX, "result",
> +		  "fexit failed err %llu\n", ftrace_res[1]))
> +		goto out;

this goto doesn't really make sense, can be dropped.

> +
> +out:
> +	test_xdp__destroy(pkt_skel);
> +	test_xdp_bpf2bpf__destroy(ftrace_skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..74c78b30ae07
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include "bpf_helpers.h"
> +#include "bpf_trace_helpers.h"
> +
> +struct net_device {
> +	/* Structure does not need to contain all entries,
> +	 * as "preserve_access_index" will use BTF to fix this...
> +	 */
> +	int ifindex;
> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> +
> +struct xdp_rxq_info {
> +	/* Structure does not need to contain all entries,
> +	 * as "preserve_access_index" will use BTF to fix this...
> +	 */
> +	struct net_device *dev;
> +	__u32 queue_index;
> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> +
> +struct xdp_buff {
> +	void *data;
> +	void *data_end;
> +	void *data_meta;
> +	void *data_hard_start;
> +	unsigned long handle;
> +	struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;
> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> +
> +__u64 test_result_fentry = 0;
> +BPF_TRACE_1("fentry/_xdp_tx_iptunnel", trace_on_entry,
> +	    struct xdp_buff *, xdp)
> +{
> +	test_result_fentry = xdp->rxq->dev->ifindex;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +__u64 test_result_fexit = 0;
> +BPF_TRACE_2("fexit/_xdp_tx_iptunnel", trace_on_exit,
> +	    struct xdp_buff*, xdp, int, ret)
> +{
> +	test_result_fexit = ret;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> 

[PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Add a test for attaching a bpf fentry/fexit trace to an XDP program

[Eelco Chaudron]

Add a test that will attach a FENTRY and FEXIT program to the XDP test
program. It will also verify data from the XDP context on FENTRY and
verifies the return code on exit.

Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>

---
v1 -> v2:
  - Changed code to use the BPF skeleton
  - Replace static volatile with global variable in eBPF code

 .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c |   44 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e6e849df2632
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <net/if.h>
+#include "test_xdp.skel.h"
+#include "test_xdp_bpf2bpf.skel.h"
+
+void test_xdp_bpf2bpf(void)
+{
+
+	struct test_xdp *pkt_skel = NULL;
+        struct test_xdp_bpf2bpf *ftrace_skel = NULL;
+	__u64 *ftrace_res;
+
+	struct vip key4 = {.protocol = 6, .family = AF_INET};
+	struct iptnl_info value4 = {.family = AF_INET};
+	char buf[128];
+	struct iphdr *iph = (void *)buf + sizeof(struct ethhdr);
+	__u32 duration = 0, retval, size;
+	int err, pkt_fd, map_fd;
+
+	/* Load XDP program to introspect */
+	pkt_skel = test_xdp__open_and_load();
+	if (CHECK(!pkt_skel, "pkt_skel_load", "test_xdp skeleton failed\n"))
+		return;
+
+	pkt_fd = bpf_program__fd(pkt_skel->progs._xdp_tx_iptunnel);
+
+	map_fd = bpf_map__fd(pkt_skel->maps.vip2tnl);
+	bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key4, &value4, 0);
+
+	DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts,
+			    .attach_prog_fd = pkt_fd,
+			   );
+
+	ftrace_skel = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__open_opts(&opts);
+	if (CHECK(!ftrace_skel, "__open", "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))
+	  goto out;
+
+	if (CHECK(test_xdp_bpf2bpf__load(ftrace_skel), "__load", "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))
+	  goto out;
+
+	err = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__attach(ftrace_skel);
+	if (CHECK(err, "ftrace_attach", "ftrace attach failed: %d\n", err))
+		goto out;
+
+        /* Run test program */
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run(pkt_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
+				buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
+
+	CHECK(err || retval != XDP_TX || size != 74 ||
+	      iph->protocol != IPPROTO_IPIP, "ipv4",
+	      "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d\n",
+	      err, errno, retval, size);
+
+	/* Verify test results */
+	ftrace_res = (__u64 *)ftrace_skel->bss;
+
+	if (CHECK(ftrace_res[0] != if_nametoindex("lo"), "result",
+		  "fentry failed err %llu\n", ftrace_res[0]))
+		goto out;
+
+	if (CHECK(ftrace_res[1] != XDP_TX, "result",
+		  "fexit failed err %llu\n", ftrace_res[1]))
+		goto out;
+
+out:
+	test_xdp__destroy(pkt_skel);
+	test_xdp_bpf2bpf__destroy(ftrace_skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..74c78b30ae07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include "bpf_helpers.h"
+#include "bpf_trace_helpers.h"
+
+struct net_device {
+	/* Structure does not need to contain all entries,
+	 * as "preserve_access_index" will use BTF to fix this...
+	 */
+	int ifindex;
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+struct xdp_rxq_info {
+	/* Structure does not need to contain all entries,
+	 * as "preserve_access_index" will use BTF to fix this...
+	 */
+	struct net_device *dev;
+	__u32 queue_index;
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+struct xdp_buff {
+	void *data;
+	void *data_end;
+	void *data_meta;
+	void *data_hard_start;
+	unsigned long handle;
+	struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;
+} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
+
+__u64 test_result_fentry = 0;
+BPF_TRACE_1("fentry/_xdp_tx_iptunnel", trace_on_entry,
+	    struct xdp_buff *, xdp)
+{
+	test_result_fentry = xdp->rxq->dev->ifindex;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+__u64 test_result_fexit = 0;
+BPF_TRACE_2("fexit/_xdp_tx_iptunnel", trace_on_exit,
+	    struct xdp_buff*, xdp, int, ret)
+{
+	test_result_fexit = ret;
+	return 0;
+}

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Add a test for attaching a bpf fentry/fexit trace to an XDP program

[Andrii Nakryiko]

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 7:58 AM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Add a test that will attach a FENTRY and FEXIT program to the XDP test
> program. It will also verify data from the XDP context on FENTRY and
> verifies the return code on exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> v1 -> v2:
>   - Changed code to use the BPF skeleton
>   - Replace static volatile with global variable in eBPF code
>
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c |   69 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c |   44 +++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..e6e849df2632
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <test_progs.h>
> +#include <net/if.h>
> +#include "test_xdp.skel.h"
> +#include "test_xdp_bpf2bpf.skel.h"
> +
> +void test_xdp_bpf2bpf(void)
> +{
> +

extra line

> +       struct test_xdp *pkt_skel = NULL;
> +        struct test_xdp_bpf2bpf *ftrace_skel = NULL;

something with indentation?

> +       __u64 *ftrace_res;
> +

variable declarations shouldn't be split, probably?

> +       struct vip key4 = {.protocol = 6, .family = AF_INET};
> +       struct iptnl_info value4 = {.family = AF_INET};
> +       char buf[128];
> +       struct iphdr *iph = (void *)buf + sizeof(struct ethhdr);
> +       __u32 duration = 0, retval, size;
> +       int err, pkt_fd, map_fd;
> +
> +       /* Load XDP program to introspect */
> +       pkt_skel = test_xdp__open_and_load();
> +       if (CHECK(!pkt_skel, "pkt_skel_load", "test_xdp skeleton failed\n"))
> +               return;
> +
> +       pkt_fd = bpf_program__fd(pkt_skel->progs._xdp_tx_iptunnel);
> +
> +       map_fd = bpf_map__fd(pkt_skel->maps.vip2tnl);
> +       bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key4, &value4, 0);
> +
> +       DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts,
> +                           .attach_prog_fd = pkt_fd,
> +                          );

DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS is a variable declaration, so should go together
with all other declarations. Compiler should complain about this, but
I guess selftests/bpf Makefile doesn't have necessary flags, that
other kernel code has. You can declare opts first and then initialize
some extra fields later:

DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);

... later in code ...

opts.attach_prog_fd = pkt_fd;


> +
> +       ftrace_skel = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__open_opts(&opts);
> +       if (CHECK(!ftrace_skel, "__open", "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))
> +         goto out;
> +
> +       if (CHECK(test_xdp_bpf2bpf__load(ftrace_skel), "__load", "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))
> +         goto out;

for consistency with attach check below and for readability, move out
load call into separate statement, it's easy to miss when it is inside
CHECK()

> +
> +       err = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__attach(ftrace_skel);
> +       if (CHECK(err, "ftrace_attach", "ftrace attach failed: %d\n", err))
> +               goto out;
> +
> +        /* Run test program */
> +       err = bpf_prog_test_run(pkt_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
> +                               buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
> +
> +       CHECK(err || retval != XDP_TX || size != 74 ||
> +             iph->protocol != IPPROTO_IPIP, "ipv4",
> +             "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d\n",
> +             err, errno, retval, size);

should it goto out here as well?

> +
> +       /* Verify test results */
> +       ftrace_res = (__u64 *)ftrace_skel->bss;
> +
> +       if (CHECK(ftrace_res[0] != if_nametoindex("lo"), "result",
> +                 "fentry failed err %llu\n", ftrace_res[0]))
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       if (CHECK(ftrace_res[1] != XDP_TX, "result",
> +                 "fexit failed err %llu\n", ftrace_res[1]))
> +               goto out;

why this casting? You can do access those variables much more
naturally with ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fentry and
ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fexit without making dangerous
assumptions about their offsets within data section.


> +
> +out:
> +       test_xdp__destroy(pkt_skel);
> +       test_xdp_bpf2bpf__destroy(ftrace_skel);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..74c78b30ae07
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include "bpf_helpers.h"
> +#include "bpf_trace_helpers.h"
> +
> +struct net_device {
> +       /* Structure does not need to contain all entries,
> +        * as "preserve_access_index" will use BTF to fix this...
> +        */
> +       int ifindex;
> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> +
> +struct xdp_rxq_info {
> +       /* Structure does not need to contain all entries,
> +        * as "preserve_access_index" will use BTF to fix this...
> +        */
> +       struct net_device *dev;
> +       __u32 queue_index;
> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> +
> +struct xdp_buff {
> +       void *data;
> +       void *data_end;
> +       void *data_meta;
> +       void *data_hard_start;
> +       unsigned long handle;
> +       struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;
> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
> +
> +__u64 test_result_fentry = 0;
> +BPF_TRACE_1("fentry/_xdp_tx_iptunnel", trace_on_entry,
> +           struct xdp_buff *, xdp)

BPF_TRACE_x is no more, see BPF_PROG and how it's used for fentry/fexit tests:

SEC("fentry/_xdp_tx_iptunnel")
int BPF_PROG(trace_on_entry, struct xdp_buff *xdp)

> +{
> +       test_result_fentry = xdp->rxq->dev->ifindex;
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +__u64 test_result_fexit = 0;
> +BPF_TRACE_2("fexit/_xdp_tx_iptunnel", trace_on_exit,
> +           struct xdp_buff*, xdp, int, ret)
> +{
> +       test_result_fexit = ret;
> +       return 0;
> +}
>

Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2] selftests/bpf: Add a test for attaching a bpf fentry/fexit trace to an XDP program

[Eelco Chaudron]

Andrii and Maciej thanks for your reviews, I’ve addressed all your 
comments, and will send out a v3 soon…

//Eelco

On 14 Jan 2020, at 19:49, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 7:58 AM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com> 
> wrote:
>>
>> Add a test that will attach a FENTRY and FEXIT program to the XDP 
>> test
>> program. It will also verify data from the XDP context on FENTRY and
>> verifies the return code on exit.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
>>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2:
>>   - Changed code to use the BPF skeleton
>>   - Replace static volatile with global variable in eBPF code
>>
>>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c |   69 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c |   44 
>> +++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>>  create mode 100644 
>> tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..e6e849df2632
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +#include <test_progs.h>
>> +#include <net/if.h>
>> +#include "test_xdp.skel.h"
>> +#include "test_xdp_bpf2bpf.skel.h"
>> +
>> +void test_xdp_bpf2bpf(void)
>> +{
>> +
>
> extra line
>
>> +       struct test_xdp *pkt_skel = NULL;
>> +        struct test_xdp_bpf2bpf *ftrace_skel = NULL;
>
> something with indentation?
>
>> +       __u64 *ftrace_res;
>> +
>
> variable declarations shouldn't be split, probably?
>
>> +       struct vip key4 = {.protocol = 6, .family = AF_INET};
>> +       struct iptnl_info value4 = {.family = AF_INET};
>> +       char buf[128];
>> +       struct iphdr *iph = (void *)buf + sizeof(struct ethhdr);
>> +       __u32 duration = 0, retval, size;
>> +       int err, pkt_fd, map_fd;
>> +
>> +       /* Load XDP program to introspect */
>> +       pkt_skel = test_xdp__open_and_load();
>> +       if (CHECK(!pkt_skel, "pkt_skel_load", "test_xdp skeleton 
>> failed\n"))
>> +               return;
>> +
>> +       pkt_fd = bpf_program__fd(pkt_skel->progs._xdp_tx_iptunnel);
>> +
>> +       map_fd = bpf_map__fd(pkt_skel->maps.vip2tnl);
>> +       bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &key4, &value4, 0);
>> +
>> +       DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts,
>> +                           .attach_prog_fd = pkt_fd,
>> +                          );
>
> DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS is a variable declaration, so should go together
> with all other declarations. Compiler should complain about this, but
> I guess selftests/bpf Makefile doesn't have necessary flags, that
> other kernel code has. You can declare opts first and then initialize
> some extra fields later:
>
> DECLARE_LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_object_open_opts, opts);
>
> ... later in code ...
>
> opts.attach_prog_fd = pkt_fd;
>
>
>> +
>> +       ftrace_skel = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__open_opts(&opts);
>> +       if (CHECK(!ftrace_skel, "__open", "ftrace skeleton 
>> failed\n"))
>> +         goto out;
>> +
>> +       if (CHECK(test_xdp_bpf2bpf__load(ftrace_skel), "__load", 
>> "ftrace skeleton failed\n"))
>> +         goto out;
>
> for consistency with attach check below and for readability, move out
> load call into separate statement, it's easy to miss when it is inside
> CHECK()
>
>> +
>> +       err = test_xdp_bpf2bpf__attach(ftrace_skel);
>> +       if (CHECK(err, "ftrace_attach", "ftrace attach failed: %d\n", 
>> err))
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +        /* Run test program */
>> +       err = bpf_prog_test_run(pkt_fd, 1, &pkt_v4, sizeof(pkt_v4),
>> +                               buf, &size, &retval, &duration);
>> +
>> +       CHECK(err || retval != XDP_TX || size != 74 ||
>> +             iph->protocol != IPPROTO_IPIP, "ipv4",
>> +             "err %d errno %d retval %d size %d\n",
>> +             err, errno, retval, size);
>
> should it goto out here as well?
>
>> +
>> +       /* Verify test results */
>> +       ftrace_res = (__u64 *)ftrace_skel->bss;
>> +
>> +       if (CHECK(ftrace_res[0] != if_nametoindex("lo"), "result",
>> +                 "fentry failed err %llu\n", ftrace_res[0]))
>> +               goto out;
>> +
>> +       if (CHECK(ftrace_res[1] != XDP_TX, "result",
>> +                 "fexit failed err %llu\n", ftrace_res[1]))
>> +               goto out;
>
> why this casting? You can do access those variables much more
> naturally with ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fentry and
> ftrace_skel->bss->test_result_fexit without making dangerous
> assumptions about their offsets within data section.
>
>
>> +
>> +out:
>> +       test_xdp__destroy(pkt_skel);
>> +       test_xdp_bpf2bpf__destroy(ftrace_skel);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c 
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..74c78b30ae07
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_xdp_bpf2bpf.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +#include <linux/bpf.h>
>> +#include "bpf_helpers.h"
>> +#include "bpf_trace_helpers.h"
>> +
>> +struct net_device {
>> +       /* Structure does not need to contain all entries,
>> +        * as "preserve_access_index" will use BTF to fix this...
>> +        */
>> +       int ifindex;
>> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>> +
>> +struct xdp_rxq_info {
>> +       /* Structure does not need to contain all entries,
>> +        * as "preserve_access_index" will use BTF to fix this...
>> +        */
>> +       struct net_device *dev;
>> +       __u32 queue_index;
>> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>> +
>> +struct xdp_buff {
>> +       void *data;
>> +       void *data_end;
>> +       void *data_meta;
>> +       void *data_hard_start;
>> +       unsigned long handle;
>> +       struct xdp_rxq_info *rxq;
>> +} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
>> +
>> +__u64 test_result_fentry = 0;
>> +BPF_TRACE_1("fentry/_xdp_tx_iptunnel", trace_on_entry,
>> +           struct xdp_buff *, xdp)
>
> BPF_TRACE_x is no more, see BPF_PROG and how it's used for 
> fentry/fexit tests:
>
> SEC("fentry/_xdp_tx_iptunnel")
> int BPF_PROG(trace_on_entry, struct xdp_buff *xdp)
>
>> +{
>> +       test_result_fentry = xdp->rxq->dev->ifindex;
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +__u64 test_result_fexit = 0;
>> +BPF_TRACE_2("fexit/_xdp_tx_iptunnel", trace_on_exit,
>> +           struct xdp_buff*, xdp, int, ret)
>> +{
>> +       test_result_fexit = ret;
>> +       return 0;
>> +}
>>