bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
	Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@chromium.org>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add a series of tests for bpf_snprintf
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2021 09:19:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzZnkYDAm2R+5R9u4YEdZLj=C8XQmpT=iS6Qv0Ne7cRBGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABRcYm+=XSt_U-19eYXU8+XwDUXoBGQMROMbm6xk9P9OHnUW_A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 3:10 AM Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 12:38 AM Andrii Nakryiko
> <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:52 AM Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > The "positive" part tests all format specifiers when things go well.
> > >
> > > The "negative" part makes sure that incorrect format strings fail at
> > > load time.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
> > > ---
> > >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/snprintf.c       | 125 ++++++++++++++++++
> > >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_snprintf.c       |  73 ++++++++++
> > >  .../bpf/progs/test_snprintf_single.c          |  20 +++
> > >  3 files changed, 218 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/snprintf.c
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_snprintf.c
> > >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_snprintf_single.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/snprintf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/snprintf.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..a958c22aec75
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/snprintf.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/* Copyright (c) 2021 Google LLC. */
> > > +
> > > +#include <test_progs.h>
> > > +#include "test_snprintf.skel.h"
> > > +#include "test_snprintf_single.skel.h"
> > > +
> > > +#define EXP_NUM_OUT  "-8 9 96 -424242 1337 DABBAD00"
> > > +#define EXP_NUM_RET  sizeof(EXP_NUM_OUT)
> > > +
> > > +#define EXP_IP_OUT   "127.000.000.001 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001"
> > > +#define EXP_IP_RET   sizeof(EXP_IP_OUT)
> > > +
> > > +/* The third specifier, %pB, depends on compiler inlining so don't check it */
> > > +#define EXP_SYM_OUT  "schedule schedule+0x0/"
> > > +#define MIN_SYM_RET  sizeof(EXP_SYM_OUT)
> > > +
> > > +/* The third specifier, %p, is a hashed pointer which changes on every reboot */
> > > +#define EXP_ADDR_OUT "0000000000000000 ffff00000add4e55 "
> > > +#define EXP_ADDR_RET sizeof(EXP_ADDR_OUT "unknownhashedptr")
> > > +
> > > +#define EXP_STR_OUT  "str1 longstr"
> > > +#define EXP_STR_RET  sizeof(EXP_STR_OUT)
> > > +
> > > +#define EXP_OVER_OUT "%over"
> > > +#define EXP_OVER_RET 10
> > > +
> > > +#define EXP_PAD_OUT "    4 000"
> >
> > Roughly 50% of the time I get failure for this test case:
> >
> > test_snprintf_positive:FAIL:pad_out unexpected pad_out: actual '    4
> > 0000' != expected '    4 000'
> >
> > Re-running this test case immediately passes. Running again most
> > probably fails. Please take a look.
>
> Do you have more information on how to reproduce this ?
> I spinned up a VM at 87bd9e602 with ./vmtest -s and then run this script:
>
> #!/bin/sh
> for i in `seq 1000`
> do
>   ./test_progs -t snprintf
>   if [ $? -ne 0 ];
>   then
>     echo FAILURE
>     exit 1
>   fi
> done
>
> The thousand executions passed.
>
> This is a bit concerning because your unexpected_pad_out seems to have
> an extra '0' so it ends up with strlen(pad_out)=11 but
> sizeof(pad_out)=10. The actual string writing is not really done by
> our helper code but by the snprintf implementation (str and str_size
> are only given to snprintf()) so I'd expect the truncation to work
> well there. I'm a bit puzzled

I'm puzzled too, have no idea. I also can't repro this with vmtest.sh.
But I can quite reliably reproduce with my local ArchLinux-based qemu
image with different config (see [0] for config itself). So please try
with my config and see if that helps to repro. If not, I'll have to
debug it on my own later.

  [0] https://gist.github.com/anakryiko/4b6ae21680842bdeacca8fa99d378048

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-26 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-19 15:52 [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] Add a snprintf eBPF helper Florent Revest
2021-04-19 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 1/6] bpf: Factorize bpf_trace_printk and bpf_seq_printf Florent Revest
2021-04-19 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 2/6] bpf: Add a ARG_PTR_TO_CONST_STR argument type Florent Revest
2021-04-19 22:54   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-20 12:35     ` Florent Revest
2021-04-20 15:23       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-22  8:41         ` Florent Revest
2021-04-19 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/6] bpf: Add a bpf_snprintf helper Florent Revest
2021-04-19 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 4/6] libbpf: Initialize the bpf_seq_printf parameters array field by field Florent Revest
2021-04-19 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 5/6] libbpf: Introduce a BPF_SNPRINTF helper macro Florent Revest
2021-04-19 15:52 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add a series of tests for bpf_snprintf Florent Revest
2021-04-23 22:38   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-26 10:10     ` Florent Revest
2021-04-26 16:19       ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2021-04-26 21:08         ` Florent Revest
2021-04-27  6:35           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-04-27  9:50             ` Florent Revest
2021-04-27 18:03               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-28 14:59                 ` Florent Revest
2021-05-05  6:55                   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-05-05 14:25                     ` Florent Revest
2021-04-19 19:33 ` [PATCH bpf-next v5 0/6] Add a snprintf eBPF helper Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-20 12:02   ` Florent Revest

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEf4BzZnkYDAm2R+5R9u4YEdZLj=C8XQmpT=iS6Qv0Ne7cRBGw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jackmanb@chromium.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=revest@chromium.org \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add a series of tests for bpf_snprintf' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).