From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B971C3F2CD for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD2A620848 for ; Tue, 3 Mar 2020 04:59:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="YloKxOZq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726970AbgCCE7h (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:59:37 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f195.google.com ([209.85.160.195]:36761 "EHLO mail-qt1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726928AbgCCE7h (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 23:59:37 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f195.google.com with SMTP id t13so1922951qto.3; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 20:59:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3ejAnt+uAyqn1WHZqMXh9jskwSigm+jlynlcBsOlBXc=; b=YloKxOZqHVIxy6syxSZwM+lbqjeDFy6KxpkO/6K3bbZn0uIAyJfqlb6ZSDB/9h2MK3 AO1ZwJuB4L62GJKcL/dRd2prxX5rhm/YxWlPLjwp7R/31Xx8R8AxdZTJxgD/bIVt10ZW 9TeZWwpOYw6eepWIdN8DU9MRGXbUvVx/lAWllcmd0JbpBQbY0iwqBIH8iusvG8p45WkM QQRXc9o7rwHFZN99Z7B19IS28qIe0RPILCTXhnySGgK9GjTsvdbd1W+fotEdsoeDkPPw NFFJf7QSzu1TKb6atRM8ee4Hk5ZhAbucgGYojnz2SVK2tJYQEYogxnXLrj5KQv3JJjLx pGnA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3ejAnt+uAyqn1WHZqMXh9jskwSigm+jlynlcBsOlBXc=; b=hABQVHfpCSJ6SuKi9bea/eHvjfwLwkNYnWjtguTJm/yX9grbfTZc04wr0XOx/Aoud5 cFHtrDMsxIOdrIpbM+3BjRpwjsLuJNryIF40mCyotqhxspzv55WWUadiL6efubF0H2kY SjR38+cSoyXFGl61t3gE/bbSZvpId15XYApATEDaTSAOublmNXdfDVDNDPybz7j+6whT Vv6CVFZHqyDJvTJMN18ydYl0+0Mj9DVwhB/WBNiuEHX5eAtVThAeVjCWT0PTq9Ak7g8z J45lqPX7aqhBziNOsieLdSdL7lF3o+szQ8ZxJxtzGmR2ez2qlD1DbiWOlwOQpRErCCS9 ye4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0zuMsjFmkRveA1DJO3yjjk66auJ9aGm+algwnUdWAPbJL3l+ek IIoq2tGpS7bEfrNkO7sP4O2cViF8zmztT7ue2IQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtqmDbp5mzDx5UV/rhQYMaaTOfgvfK+dBtgdJSBs0z+K22Ip5cO/Nr/k0tbIYrU8l5YAbN7VUNq7mVp5IqFfHA= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4d4b:: with SMTP id x11mr2787467qtv.171.1583211575848; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 20:59:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200301081045.3491005-1-andriin@fb.com> <20200303005951.72szj5sb5rveh4xp@ast-mbp> In-Reply-To: From: Andrii Nakryiko Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 20:59:24 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Improve raw tracepoint BTF types preservation To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Andrii Nakryiko , bpf , Networking , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Wenbo Zhang , Kernel Team Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 8:10 PM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 4:59 PM Alexei Starovoitov > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Mar 01, 2020 at 12:10:42AM -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > > Fix issue with not preserving btf_trace_##call structs when compiled under > > > Clang. Additionally, capture raw tracepoint arguments in raw_tp_##call > > > structs, directly usable from BPF programs. Convert runqslower to use those > > > for proof of concept and to simplify code further. > > > > Not only folks compile kernel with clang they use the latest BPF/BTF features > > with it. This is very nice to see! > > I've applied 1st patch to make clang compiled kernel emit proper BTF. > > > > As far as patch 2 I'm not sure about 'raw_tp_' prefix. tp_btf type of progs can > > use the same structs. So I think there could be a better name. Also bpftool can > > generate them as well while emitting vmlinux.h. I think that will avoid adding > > few kilobytes to vmlinux BTF that kernel isn't going to use atm. > > Fair enough, I'll follow up with bpftool changes to generate such > structs. I'm thinking to use tp_args_xxx name pattern, unless someone > has a better idea :) Bad news. BTF_KIND_FUNC_PROTOs don't capture argument names and having something like: struct tp_args_sched_switch { bool arg1; struct task_struct *arg2; struct task_struct *arg3; }; doesn't seem like a good solution...