From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
dccp@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 14/17] libbpf: Add support for SK_LOOKUP program type
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 10:41:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzaE=+0ZkwqetjDHg4MnE1WDQDKFHqEkM825h6YMCZAdNA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200506125514.1020829-15-jakub@cloudflare.com>
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:58 AM Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> wrote:
>
> Make libbpf aware of the newly added program type, and assign it a
> section name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 3 +++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 2 ++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 2 ++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 977add1b73e2..74f4a15dc19e 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -6524,6 +6524,7 @@ BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(perf_event, BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(tracing, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(struct_ops, BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(extension, BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT);
> +BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(sk_lookup, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP);
>
> enum bpf_attach_type
> bpf_program__get_expected_attach_type(struct bpf_program *prog)
> @@ -6684,6 +6685,8 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
> BPF_EAPROG_SEC("cgroup/setsockopt", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCKOPT,
> BPF_CGROUP_SETSOCKOPT),
> BPF_PROG_SEC("struct_ops", BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS),
> + BPF_EAPROG_SEC("sk_lookup", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP,
> + BPF_SK_LOOKUP),
> };
>
> #undef BPF_PROG_SEC_IMPL
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index f1dacecb1619..8373fbacbba3 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -337,6 +337,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_perf_event(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_tracing(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_struct_ops(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_extension(struct bpf_program *prog);
> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_sk_lookup(struct bpf_program *prog);
>
> LIBBPF_API enum bpf_prog_type bpf_program__get_type(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__set_type(struct bpf_program *prog,
> @@ -364,6 +365,7 @@ LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_perf_event(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_tracing(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_struct_ops(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_extension(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> +LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_sk_lookup(const struct bpf_program *prog);
cc Yonghong, bpf_iter programs should probably have similar
is_xxx/set_xxx functions?..
>
> /*
> * No need for __attribute__((packed)), all members of 'bpf_map_def'
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> index e03bd4db827e..113ac0a669c2 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> @@ -253,6 +253,8 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.8 {
> bpf_program__set_attach_target;
> bpf_program__set_lsm;
> bpf_set_link_xdp_fd_opts;
> + bpf_program__is_sk_lookup;
> + bpf_program__set_sk_lookup;
> } LIBBPF_0.0.7;
>
0.0.8 is sealed, please add them into 0.0.9 map below
> LIBBPF_0.0.9 {
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
> index 2c92059c0c90..5c6d3e49f254 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_probes.c
> @@ -109,6 +109,7 @@ probe_load(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type, const struct bpf_insn *insns,
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT:
> case BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM:
> + case BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_LOOKUP:
> default:
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.25.3
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-08 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-06 12:54 [PATCH bpf-next 00/17] Run a BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/17] flow_dissector: Extract attach/detach/query helpers Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/17] bpf: Introduce SK_LOOKUP program type with a dedicated attach point Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 13:16 ` Lorenz Bauer
2020-05-06 13:53 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-07 20:55 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-05-08 8:54 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-08 7:06 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-05-08 10:45 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-08 18:39 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-05-11 9:08 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-11 18:59 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-05-11 19:26 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-11 20:54 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2020-05-12 14:16 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:54 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/17] inet: Store layer 4 protocol in inet_hashinfo Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/17] inet: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/17] inet: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/17] inet6: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/17] inet6: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/17] udp: Store layer 4 protocol in udp_table Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/17] udp: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/17] udp: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/17] udp6: Extract helper for selecting socket from reuseport group Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/17] udp6: Run SK_LOOKUP BPF program on socket lookup Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/17] bpf: Sync linux/bpf.h to tools/ Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/17] libbpf: Add support for SK_LOOKUP program type Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-08 17:41 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2020-05-08 17:52 ` Yonghong Song
2020-05-08 17:59 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-05-11 8:12 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/17] selftests/bpf: Add verifier tests for bpf_sk_lookup context access Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/17] selftests/bpf: Rename test_sk_lookup_kern.c to test_ref_track_kern.c Jakub Sitnicki
2020-05-06 12:55 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/17] selftests/bpf: Tests for BPF_SK_LOOKUP attach point Jakub Sitnicki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEf4BzaE=+0ZkwqetjDHg4MnE1WDQDKFHqEkM825h6YMCZAdNA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kernel-team@cloudflare.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).