bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 bpf-next RESEND 1/2] bpf: Add bpf_read_branch_records() helper
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 11:23:02 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4Bzam8ikJO7atrSS8s-rLJ0jHKNjahcuVEWFh7AAbGTaoGw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200210200737.13866-2-dxu@dxuuu.xyz>

On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 12:09 PM Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz> wrote:
>
> Branch records are a CPU feature that can be configured to record
> certain branches that are taken during code execution. This data is
> particularly interesting for profile guided optimizations. perf has had
> branch record support for a while but the data collection can be a bit
> coarse grained.
>
> We (Facebook) have seen in experiments that associating metadata with
> branch records can improve results (after postprocessing). We generally
> use bpf_probe_read_*() to get metadata out of userspace. That's why bpf
> support for branch records is useful.
>
> Aside from this particular use case, having branch data available to bpf
> progs can be useful to get stack traces out of userspace applications
> that omit frame pointers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Xu <dxu@dxuuu.xyz>
> ---

LGTM, one typo in description of the helper. bpf-next is still closed,
btw, but should hopefully open soon.

Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>

>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index f1d74a2bd234..3004470b7269 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -2892,6 +2892,25 @@ union bpf_attr {
>   *             Obtain the 64bit jiffies
>   *     Return
>   *             The 64 bit jiffies
> + *
> + * int bpf_read_branch_records(struct bpf_perf_event_data *ctx, void *buf, u32 size, u64 flags)
> + *     Description
> + *             For an eBPF program attached to a perf event, retrieve the
> + *             branch records (struct perf_branch_entry) associated to *ctx*
> + *             and store it in the buffer pointed by *buf* up to size
> + *             *buf_size* bytes.
> + *     Return
> + *             On success, number of bytes written to *buf*. On error, a
> + *             negative value.
> + *
> + *             The *flags* can be set to **BPF_F_GET_BRANCH_RECORDS_SIZE** to
> + *             instead return the number of bytes required to store all the
> + *             branch entries. If this flag is set, *buf* may be NULL.
> + *
> + *             **-EINVAL** if arguments invalid or **buf_size** not a multiple

buf_size -> size

> + *             of sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry).
> + *
> + *             **-ENOENT** if architecture does not support branch records.
>   */

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-11 19:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 20:07 [PATCH v7 bpf-next RESEND 0/2] Add bpf_read_branch_records() helper Daniel Xu
2020-02-10 20:07 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next RESEND 1/2] bpf: " Daniel Xu
2020-02-11 19:23   ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2020-02-14  6:34     ` Daniel Xu
2020-02-10 20:07 ` [PATCH v7 bpf-next RESEND 2/2] selftests/bpf: add bpf_read_branch_records() selftest Daniel Xu
2020-02-11 19:30   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-02-14  7:05     ` Daniel Xu
2020-02-14 17:47       ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEf4Bzam8ikJO7atrSS8s-rLJ0jHKNjahcuVEWFh7AAbGTaoGw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dxu@dxuuu.xyz \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).