bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf/benchs: Add benchmark test for bloom filter maps
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2021 20:35:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzbMAogriaief+EOhVXXbon2y=KmN_JaYcMk_LVj3tCk1w@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210831225005.2762202-5-joannekoong@fb.com>

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 3:52 PM Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com> wrote:
>
> This patch adds benchmark tests for the throughput and false positive
> rate of bloom filter map lookups for a given number of entries and a
> given number of hash functions.
>
> These benchmarks show that as the number of hash functions increases,
> the throughput and the false positive rate of the bloom filter map
> decreases. From the benchmark data, the approximate average
> false-positive rates are roughly as follows:
>
> 1 hash function = ~30%
> 2 hash functions = ~15%
> 3 hash functions = ~5%
> 4 hash functions = ~2.5%
> 5 hash functions = ~1%
> 6 hash functions = 0.5%
> 7 hash functions  = ~0.35%
> 8 hash functions = ~0.15%
> 9 hash functions = ~0.1%
> 10 hash functions = ~0%
>
> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannekoong@fb.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |   4 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.c           |  35 ++
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bench.h           |   3 +
>  .../bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c       | 344 ++++++++++++++++++
>  .../bpf/benchs/run_bench_bloom_filter_map.sh  |  28 ++
>  .../bpf/benchs/run_bench_ringbufs.sh          |  30 +-
>  .../selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh        |  48 +++
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/bloom_filter_map.c    |  74 ++++
>  8 files changed, 537 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/bench_bloom_filter_map.c
>  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_bench_bloom_filter_map.sh
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/benchs/run_common.sh
>

[...]

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bloom_filter_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bloom_filter_map.c
> index 2d9c43a30246..1b139689219e 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bloom_filter_map.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bloom_filter_map.c
> @@ -1,7 +1,9 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-3.0
>  /* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
>
> +#include <errno.h>
>  #include <linux/bpf.h>
> +#include <stdbool.h>
>  #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>
>  char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
> @@ -23,8 +25,38 @@ struct {
>         __uint(nr_hashes, 2);
>  } map_bloom_filter SEC(".maps");
>
> +/* Tracks the number of hits, drops, and false hits */
> +struct {
> +       __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY);
> +       __uint(max_entries, 3);
> +       __type(key, __u32);
> +       __type(value, __u64);
> +} percpu_array SEC(".maps");
> +
> +struct {
> +       __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH);
> +       __uint(max_entries, 1000);
> +       __type(key, __u64);
> +       __type(value, __u64);
> +} hashmap SEC(".maps");
> +
> +const __u32 hit_key  = 0;
> +const __u32 drop_key  = 1;
> +const __u32 false_hit_key = 2;
> +
> +bool hashmap_use_bloom_filter = true;
> +
>  int error = 0;
>
> +static __always_inline void log_result(__u32 key)
> +{
> +       __u64 *count;
> +
> +       count = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&percpu_array, &key);
> +       if (count)
> +               *count += 1;

it will be actually more performant to have a global array with some
fixed number of elements (e.g., 256, to support up to 256 CPUs), one
for each CPU, instead of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_ARRAY. Don't know how
much impact that has on benchmark, but doing one extra per-cpu map
lookup for each Bloom filter lookup might be a significant portion of
spent CPU.

> +}
> +
>  static __u64
>  check_elem(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val,
>            void *data)
> @@ -37,6 +69,8 @@ check_elem(struct bpf_map *map, __u32 *key, __u64 *val,
>                 return 1; /* stop the iteration */
>         }
>
> +       log_result(hit_key);
> +
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> @@ -47,3 +81,43 @@ int prog_bloom_filter(void *ctx)
>
>         return 0;
>  }
> +
> +SEC("fentry/__x64_sys_getpgid")
> +int prog_bloom_filter_hashmap_lookup(void *ctx)
> +{
> +       __u64 *result;
> +       int i, err;
> +
> +       union {
> +               __u64 data64;
> +               __u32 data32[2];
> +       } val;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < 512; i++) {
> +               val.data32[0] = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> +               val.data32[1] = bpf_get_prandom_u32();
> +
> +               if (hashmap_use_bloom_filter) {
> +                       err = bpf_map_peek_elem(&map_bloom_filter, &val);
> +                       if (err) {
> +                               if (err != -ENOENT) {
> +                                       error |= 2;
> +                                       return 0;
> +                               }
> +                               log_result(drop_key);
> +                               continue;
> +                       }
> +               }
> +
> +               result = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hashmap, &val);
> +               if (result) {
> +                       log_result(hit_key);
> +               } else {
> +                       if (hashmap_use_bloom_filter)
> +                               log_result(false_hit_key);
> +                       log_result(drop_key);
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> --
> 2.30.2
>

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-02  3:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-31 22:50 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] Implement bloom filter map Joanne Koong
2021-08-31 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] bpf: Add bloom filter map implementation Joanne Koong
2021-09-01  2:55   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-02 19:11     ` Joanne Koong
2021-09-02  1:44   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-02  5:11     ` John Fastabend
2021-09-02  6:16       ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-09-02 22:07       ` Joanne Koong
2021-09-03  0:56         ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-09-03  7:13           ` Joanne Koong
2021-09-03 17:19             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-03 17:22         ` John Fastabend
2021-09-08 19:10           ` Joanne Koong
2021-09-02  3:16   ` John Fastabend
2021-09-02  3:28     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-09-02  4:40       ` John Fastabend
2021-08-31 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] libbpf: Allow the number of hashes in bloom filter maps to be configurable Joanne Koong
2021-09-02  3:30   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-08-31 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] selftests/bpf: Add bloom filter map test cases Joanne Koong
2021-09-01  2:55   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-08-31 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf/benchs: Add benchmark test for bloom filter maps Joanne Koong
2021-09-02  3:35   ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2021-08-31 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] bpf/benchs: Add benchmarks for comparing hashmap lookups with vs. without bloom filter Joanne Koong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAEf4BzbMAogriaief+EOhVXXbon2y=KmN_JaYcMk_LVj3tCk1w@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=joannekoong@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).