From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA54C4338F for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 09:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D94560F8F for ; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 09:41:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234816AbhHCJlb (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2021 05:41:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:43256 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235204AbhHCJlW (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Aug 2021 05:41:22 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com (mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD4CCC0617BA; Tue, 3 Aug 2021 02:40:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qv1-xf2b.google.com with SMTP id db14so10282945qvb.10; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 02:40:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=eEM/WUlwtx4hf39m52l1JLiRl2wv7VkPd8bo9YRHmTw=; b=lotxXYGxZ2Eyv9JyDkqQpsec5Y9QMObShmBvwV4m3BXxqtxVIOzAA2dEs10C4UTCRc 3rEcFxJg6qt/Y6F94PWLZc5V0ql7rKcr6ZTh1s9CF7Z1EckGZYlI7V3u+ToVCdAponWT YuYnqFXT0xlXBRtuz4+koCBTCfo6zy8CTcYVObJLMKBRBU6PfHwmDhBxgKN8Xkxl+J3y vd2Tlj72nhmHcjdBSOisHJvIj6hP4JD9UPSAYFup1clcambsYVrpsgLM9a5f/qDWWCuH pfSLTLiI0Aro+U4RgPLVJJuVEmWvn2hM/BS1aqaqPKIHrfiNbBYMyJN7/9jmhQ+jUBUB M9hA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=eEM/WUlwtx4hf39m52l1JLiRl2wv7VkPd8bo9YRHmTw=; b=ges3W28YrmPPx8SxN5va1VeXsRh1BHBPSojYW82fOAipA8fN1oHPfoawZFEAmWrS/8 j8mvZM/ZIBqPxn+SfG37dkR7FPOIZl4ziXH/vEHMVdDxjrHbrwC0bZJuTysyZm36OMMF qUENfqioPwRAJltKUB0sba0uMU7lZx1mleneoozvlkfhAFJSyObOOUTgTpgcVuJXWn+J XkkadHft4RS14BY4kKOhSoMRSWxy1fGCHUkK3PYSLzrw9ghH7SjVkY1asWVPjPRZ593E DpnDubRjC/nVWz8uAXffSYK7KwPeXJjYVY57TQvtRb4t0KesTH+mg6jt7W8rmCWWmPS1 5BRg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530vU83wbYm7nPM/N7YYGvWnJEBAHmg7FrSqi4kCGx0n/0CqEFj0 yXXqhlypaOqG1sv8nNkQZkgHBLp0CRB+X3ieiA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4DPTwee4CM3c+Tm5owlyWgAPW1jiwL8X4xwkcuqyl1V5tPTwJEgY379JbJkAMxbG3omuDw5WxeoMyhjCHTR8= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:e8cc:: with SMTP id m12mr4709162qvo.7.1627983622698; Tue, 03 Aug 2021 02:40:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210609135537.1460244-1-joamaki@gmail.com> <20210728234350.28796-1-joamaki@gmail.com> <20210728234350.28796-7-joamaki@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jussi Maki Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2021 11:40:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v4 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add tests for XDP bonding To: Andrii Nakryiko Cc: bpf , Networking , Daniel Borkmann , j.vosburgh@gmail.com, Andy Gospodarek , vfalico@gmail.com, Andrii Nakryiko , Maciej Fijalkowski , Magnus Karlsson Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 2:19 AM Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 2, 2021 at 6:24 AM wrote: > > > > From: Jussi Maki > > > > Add a test suite to test XDP bonding implementation > > over a pair of veth devices. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jussi Maki > > --- > > Was there any reason not to use BPF skeleton in your new tests? And > also bpf_link-based XDP attachment instead of netlink-based? Not really. I used the existing xdp_redirect_multi test as basis and that used this approach. I'll give a go at changing this to use the BPF skeletons.