bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>,
	Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@kernel.org>,
	Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Saeed Mahameed <saeed@kernel.org>,
	"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Tirthendu <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: Crash for i40e on net-next (was: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support)
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2021 11:45:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ8uoz2_nvDd+n_YfZZyd1m6xByQ6wo_D2HKSPRVi061+2M1RQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKgT0UceK7D1R7c_Y=ze4_6pupCfLpfr5QOj-GCeJeMSD=P48g@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 6:43 PM Alexander Duyck
<alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 10:28 PM Magnus Karlsson
> <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 5:05 PM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> > <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:42:23 +0200
> > > Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 12:24:32 +0200
> > > > Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:39 PM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> > > > > <brouer@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:12:32 +0200
> > > > > > Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > > > > > more than I get.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I clearly have a bug in the i40e driver.  As I wrote later, I don't see
> > > > > > any packets transmitted for XDP_TX.  Hmm, I using Mel Gorman's tree,
> > > > > > which contains the i40e/ice/ixgbe bug we fixed earlier.
> > > >
> > > > Something is wrong with i40e, I changed git-tree to net-next (at
> > > > commit 5d869070569a) and XDP seems to have stopped working on i40e :-(
> >
> > Found this out too when switching to the net tree yesterday to work on
> > proper packet drop tracing as you spotted/requested yesterday. The
> > commit below completely broke XDP support on i40e (if you do not run
> > with a zero-copy AF_XDP socket because that path still works). I am
> > working on a fix that does not just revert the patch, but fixes the
> > original problem without breaking XDP. Will post it and the tracing
> > fixes as soon as I can.
> >
> > commit 12738ac4754ec92a6a45bf3677d8da780a1412b3
> > Author: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
> > Date:   Fri Mar 26 19:43:40 2021 +0100
> >
> >     i40e: Fix sparse errors in i40e_txrx.c
> >
> >     Remove error handling through pointers. Instead use plain int
> >     to return value from i40e_run_xdp(...).
> >
> >     Previously:
> >     - sparse errors were produced during compilation:
> >     i40e_txrx.c:2338 i40e_run_xdp() error: (-2147483647) too low for ERR_PTR
> >     i40e_txrx.c:2558 i40e_clean_rx_irq() error: 'skb' dereferencing
> > possible ERR_PTR()
> >
> >     - sk_buff* was used to return value, but it has never had valid
> >     pointer to sk_buff. Returned value was always int handled as
> >     a pointer.
> >
> >     Fixes: 0c8493d90b6b ("i40e: add XDP support for pass and drop actions")
> >     Fixes: 2e6893123830 ("i40e: split XDP_TX tail and XDP_REDIRECT map
> > flushing")
> >     Signed-off-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
> >     Tested-by: Dave Switzer <david.switzer@intel.com>
> >     Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
>
> Yeah, this patch would horribly break things, especially in the
> multi-buffer case. The idea behind using the skb pointer to indicate
> the error is that it is persistent until we hit the EOP descriptor.
> With that removed you end up mangling the entire list of frames since
> it will start trying to process the next frame in the middle of a
> packet.
>
> >
> > > Renamed subj as this is without this patchset applied.
> > >
> > > > $ uname -a
> > > > Linux broadwell 5.12.0-rc7-net-next+ #600 SMP PREEMPT Thu Apr 22 15:13:15 CEST 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > > >
> > > > When I load any XDP prog almost no packets are let through:
> > > >
> > > >  [kernel-bpf-samples]$ sudo ./xdp1 i40e2
> > > >  libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(16) .eh_frame
> > > >  libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(17) .rel.eh_frame for section(16) .eh_frame
> > > >  proto 17:          1 pkt/s
> > > >  proto 0:          0 pkt/s
> > > >  proto 17:          0 pkt/s
> > > >  proto 0:          0 pkt/s
> > > >  proto 17:          1 pkt/s
> > >
> > > Trying out xdp_redirect:
> > >
> > >  [kernel-bpf-samples]$ sudo ./xdp_redirect i40e2 i40e2
> > >  input: 7 output: 7
> > >  libbpf: elf: skipping unrecognized data section(20) .eh_frame
> > >  libbpf: elf: skipping relo section(21) .rel.eh_frame for section(20) .eh_frame
> > >  libbpf: Kernel error message: XDP program already attached
> > >  WARN: link set xdp fd failed on 7
> > >  ifindex 7:       7357 pkt/s
> > >  ifindex 7:       7909 pkt/s
> > >  ifindex 7:       7909 pkt/s
> > >  ifindex 7:       7909 pkt/s
> > >  ifindex 7:       7909 pkt/s
> > >  ifindex 7:       7909 pkt/s
> > >  ifindex 7:       6357 pkt/s
> > >
> > > And then it crash (see below) at page_frag_free+0x31 which calls
> > > virt_to_head_page() with a wrong addr (I guess).  This is called by
> > > i40e_clean_tx_irq+0xc9.
> >
> > Did not see a crash myself, just 4 Kpps. But the rings and DMA
> > mappings got completely mangled by the patch above, so could be the
> > same cause.
>
> Are you running with jumbo frames enabled? I would think this change
> would really blow things up in the jumbo enabled case.

I did not. Just using XDP_DROP or XDP_TX would crash the system just fine.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-25  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-08 12:50 [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 01/14] xdp: introduce mb in xdp_buff/xdp_frame Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:17   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 16:03     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-29 13:36   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-29 13:54     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 02/14] xdp: add xdp_shared_info data structure Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 13:39   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-08 14:26     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:06   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 03/14] net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:19   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 16:24     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 04/14] xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame} Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:30   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 16:28     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 05/14] net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 18:40   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 16:36     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 06/14] net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:50 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 07/14] net: xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_build_skb_from_fram Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 08/14] bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 19:15   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-08 20:54     ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 18:13       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 09/14] bpd: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 20:57   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-09 18:19     ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 21:04   ` Vladimir Oltean
2021-04-14  8:08     ` Eelco Chaudron
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 10/14] bpf: add new frame_length field to the XDP ctx Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 11/14] bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 12/14] bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 13/14] bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish signature Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-08 12:51 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 14/14] bpf: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include multi-buffer Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-09  0:56 ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support John Fastabend
2021-04-09 20:16   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-13 15:16   ` Eelco Chaudron
2021-04-16 14:27 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-16 21:29   ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-16 23:00     ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-04-18 16:18   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-19  6:20     ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-19  6:55       ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-20 13:49         ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-21 12:47           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-21 14:12             ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-21 15:39               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-22 10:24                 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-22 14:42                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-22 15:05                     ` Crash for i40e on net-next (was: [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support) Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-04-23  5:28                       ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-23 16:43                         ` Alexander Duyck
2021-04-25  9:45                           ` Magnus Karlsson [this message]
2021-04-27 18:28   ` [PATCH v8 bpf-next 00/14] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-04-28  7:41     ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-04-29 12:49       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJ8uoz2_nvDd+n_YfZZyd1m6xByQ6wo_D2HKSPRVi061+2M1RQ@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
    --cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeed@kernel.org \
    --cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).