From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: "Magnus Karlsson" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
"Björn Töpel" <bjorn.topel@intel.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jonathan Lemon" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix crash in poll when device does not support ndo_xsk_wakeup
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:06:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ8uoz2kfVSWnOkNzbL+D7tcOaoGxE3WnemY=QrbXyiDiO-bBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191001221948.GA10044@pc-63.home>
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 7:57 AM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 03:30:12PM +0200, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> > Fixes a crash in poll() when an AF_XDP socket is opened in copy mode
> > with the XDP_USE_NEED_WAKEUP flag set and the bound device does not
> > have ndo_xsk_wakeup defined. Avoid trying to call the non-existing ndo
> > and instead call the internal xsk sendmsg functionality to send
> > packets in the same way (from the application's point of view) as
> > calling sendmsg() in any mode or poll() in zero-copy mode would have
> > done. The application should behave in the same way independent on if
> > zero-copy mode or copy-mode is used.
> >
> > Fixes: 77cd0d7b3f25 ("xsk: add support for need_wakeup flag in AF_XDP rings")
> > Reported-by: syzbot+a5765ed8cdb1cca4d249@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
>
> Overall looks good, two very small nits:
>
> > ---
> > net/xdp/xsk.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> > index c2f1af3..a478d8ec 100644
> > --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c
> > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c
> > @@ -327,8 +327,7 @@ static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb)
> > sock_wfree(skb);
> > }
> >
> > -static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *m,
> > - size_t total_len)
> > +static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk)
> > {
> > u32 max_batch = TX_BATCH_SIZE;
> > struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk);
> > @@ -394,22 +393,31 @@ static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *m,
> > return err;
> > }
> >
> > -static int xsk_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len)
> > +static int __xsk_sendmsg(struct socket *sock)
> > {
> > - bool need_wait = !(m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> > struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> > struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk);
>
> Can't we just only pass xs as an argument to __xsk_sendmsg()? From
> below xsk_sendmsg() we eventually fetch xs anyway same as for the
> xsk_poll(), yet in __xsk_sendmsg() we pass sock (which is otherwise
> unused) and then we need to refetch sk and xs once again.
xs is enough for the zerocopy path, but I need sk for the generic skb
path. In any way, sock can be exterminated and the code simplified, as
you suggest. Will fix.
> > - if (unlikely(!xsk_is_bound(xs)))
> > - return -ENXIO;
> > if (unlikely(!(xs->dev->flags & IFF_UP)))
> > return -ENETDOWN;
> > if (unlikely(!xs->tx))
> > return -ENOBUFS;
> > +
> > + return xs->zc ? xsk_zc_xmit(sk) : xsk_generic_xmit(sk);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int xsk_sendmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *m, size_t total_len)
> > +{
> > + bool need_wait = !(m->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
> > + struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
> > + struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk);
> > +
> > + if (unlikely(!xsk_is_bound(xs)))
> > + return -ENXIO;
> > if (need_wait)
>
> Not directly related but since you touch this code, need_wait should
> be marked unlikely() as well.
Will fix.
Thanks: Magnus
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> >
> > - return (xs->zc) ? xsk_zc_xmit(sk) : xsk_generic_xmit(sk, m, total_len);
> > + return __xsk_sendmsg(sock);
> > }
> >
> > static unsigned int xsk_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
> > @@ -426,9 +434,14 @@ static unsigned int xsk_poll(struct file *file, struct socket *sock,
> > dev = xs->dev;
> > umem = xs->umem;
> >
> > - if (umem->need_wakeup)
> > - dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_wakeup(dev, xs->queue_id,
> > - umem->need_wakeup);
> > + if (umem->need_wakeup) {
> > + if (dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_wakeup)
> > + dev->netdev_ops->ndo_xsk_wakeup(dev, xs->queue_id,
> > + umem->need_wakeup);
> > + else
> > + /* Poll needs to drive Tx also in copy mode */
> > + __xsk_sendmsg(sock);
> > + }
> >
> > if (xs->rx && !xskq_empty_desc(xs->rx))
> > mask |= POLLIN | POLLRDNORM;
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-02 6:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-30 13:30 [PATCH bpf] xsk: fix crash in poll when device does not support ndo_xsk_wakeup Magnus Karlsson
2019-09-30 15:22 ` Jonathan Lemon
2019-10-01 22:19 ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-10-02 6:06 ` Magnus Karlsson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJ8uoz2kfVSWnOkNzbL+D7tcOaoGxE3WnemY=QrbXyiDiO-bBg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).