From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
To: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo@kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
"Network Development" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Lorenzo Bianconi" <lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
shayagr@amazon.com, "David Ahern" <dsahern@kernel.org>,
"Jesper Dangaard Brouer" <brouer@redhat.com>,
"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"Alexander Duyck" <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
"Saeed Mahameed" <saeed@kernel.org>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
"Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
Tirthendu <tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 bpf-next 00/18] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:48:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ8uoz3Dfz=RGoF2zqhVBXYA+AfPYvVu_SqcrEnKZY1QHxNdJQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2C4CB8CA-1234-4761-8F74-49A198F94880@redhat.com>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2021 at 12:04 PM Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 21 Sep 2021, at 0:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>
> > Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> writes:
> >
> >> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 23:01:48 +0200 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >>>> In fact I don't think there is anything infra can do better for
> >>>> flushing than the prog itself:
> >>>>
> >>>> bool mod = false;
> >>>>
> >>>> ptr = bpf_header_pointer(...);
> >>>> ...
> >>>> if (some_cond(...)) {
> >>>> change_packet(...);
> >>>> mod = true;
> >>>> }
> >>>> ...
> >>>> if (mod)
> >>>
> >>> to have an additional check like:
> >>>
> >>> if (mod && ptr == stack)
> >>>
> >>> (or something to that effect). No?
> >>
> >> Good point. Do you think we should have the kernel add/inline this
> >> optimization or have the user do it explicitly.
> >
> > Hmm, good question. On the one hand it seems like an easy optimisation
> > to add, but on the other hand maybe the caller has other logic that can
> > better know how/when to omit the check.
> >
> > Hmm, but the helper needs to check it anyway, doesn't it? At least it
> > can't just blindly memcpy() if the source and destination would be the
> > same...
> >
> >> The draft API was:
> >>
> >> void *xdp_mb_pointer_flush(struct xdp_buff *xdp_md, u32 flags,
> >> u32 offset, u32 len, void *stack_buf)
> >>
> >> Which does not take the ptr returned by header_pointer(), but that's
> >> easy to add (well, easy other than the fact it'd be the 6th arg).
> >
> > I guess we could play some trickery with stuffing offset/len/flags into
> > one or two u64s to save an argument or two?
> >
> >> BTW I drafted the API this way to cater to the case where flush()
> >> is called without a prior call to header_pointer(). For when packet
> >> trailer or header is populated directly from a map value. Dunno if
> >> that's actually useful, either.
> >
> > Ah, didn't think of that; so then it really becomes a generic
> > xdp_store_bytes()-type helper? Might be useful, I suppose. Adding
> > headers is certainly a fairly common occurrence, but dunno to what
> > extent they'd be copied wholesale from a map (hadn't thought about doing
> > that before either).
>
>
> Sorry for commenting late but I was busy and had to catch up on emails...
>
> I like the idea, as these APIs are exactly what I proposed in April, https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/FD3E6E08-DE78-4FBA-96F6-646C93E88631@redhat.com/
>
> I did not call it flush, as it can be used as a general function to copy data to a specific location.
Here is some performance data (throughput) for this patch set on i40e
(40 Gbit/s NIC). All using the xdp_rxq_info sample and NO multi-buffer
packets.
With v14 only:
XDP_DROP: +4%
XDP_TX: +1%
XDP_PASS: -1%
With v14 plus multi-buffer support implemented in i40e courtesy of Tirtha:
XDP_DROP: +3%
XDP_TX: -1%
XDP_PASS: -2%
/Magnus
>
> //Eelco
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-28 11:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 16:14 [PATCH v14 bpf-next 00/18] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 01/18] net: skbuff: add size metadata to skb_shared_info for xdp Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:18 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 02/18] xdp: introduce flags field in xdp_buff/xdp_frame Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:19 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 03/18] net: mvneta: update mb bit before passing the xdp buffer to eBPF layer Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-20 8:25 ` Shay Agroskin
2021-09-20 8:37 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-20 8:45 ` Shay Agroskin
2021-09-20 9:00 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 04/18] net: mvneta: simplify mvneta_swbm_add_rx_fragment management Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 05/18] net: xdp: add xdp_update_skb_shared_info utility routine Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 06/18] net: marvell: rely on " Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 07/18] xdp: add multi-buff support to xdp_return_{buff/frame} Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 08/18] net: mvneta: add multi buffer support to XDP_TX Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 09/18] net: mvneta: enable jumbo frames for XDP Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 10/18] bpf: add multi-buff support to the bpf_xdp_adjust_tail() API Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-16 16:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-17 10:02 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-17 13:03 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 11/18] bpf: introduce bpf_xdp_get_buff_len helper Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 12/18] bpf: add multi-buffer support to xdp copy helpers Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 13/18] bpf: move user_size out of bpf_test_init Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 14/18] bpf: introduce multibuff support to bpf_prog_test_run_xdp() Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 15/18] bpf: test_run: add xdp_shared_info pointer in bpf_test_finish signature Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 16/18] bpf: update xdp_adjust_tail selftest to include multi-buffer Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 17/18] net: xdp: introduce bpf_xdp_adjust_data helper Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-10 16:14 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 18/18] bpf: add bpf_xdp_adjust_data selftest Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-16 16:55 ` [PATCH v14 bpf-next 00/18] mvneta: introduce XDP multi-buffer support Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-17 14:51 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-09-17 18:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-17 18:43 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-17 19:00 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-17 19:10 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-17 22:07 ` John Fastabend
2021-09-18 11:53 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-20 18:02 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-20 21:01 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-20 21:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-20 22:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-21 10:03 ` Eelco Chaudron
2021-09-28 11:48 ` Magnus Karlsson [this message]
2021-09-29 10:36 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-09-29 12:25 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-29 12:32 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-09-29 17:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 17:46 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 10:41 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-09-29 12:10 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-09-29 12:38 ` Lorenz Bauer
2021-09-29 18:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-09-29 19:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-09-29 20:39 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-10-01 9:03 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-10-01 18:35 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-10-06 9:32 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2021-10-06 10:08 ` Eelco Chaudron
2021-10-06 12:15 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJ8uoz3Dfz=RGoF2zqhVBXYA+AfPYvVu_SqcrEnKZY1QHxNdJQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=brouer@redhat.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=echaudro@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.bianconi@redhat.com \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=saeed@kernel.org \
--cc=shayagr@amazon.com \
--cc=tirthendu.sarkar@intel.com \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).