From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 098D1C3A59F for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4A720850 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="gK38A443" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728808AbfHZREG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:04:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f196.google.com ([209.85.214.196]:35491 "EHLO mail-pl1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727205AbfHZREG (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 13:04:06 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f196.google.com with SMTP id gn20so10324249plb.2 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:04:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FQr2+CCalKgDrA12cz6kTPFlEgpE4NTSJBHk84k9KlA=; b=gK38A443J07JEv1eh/lZRr+OP0alDEoLrPFRvrv0zx5PtWmDjpTo4wBqkXvanXqjRb womdthz/nhAEw63Hr7UOKqCsf5KERELbxa/Zr5s1O5Mzy8LBJsr8yN34FuO60Jm1IiuT UXgjQtyVt5Gwo0tmxjHxcSj1RAoSitwBdXQW+n+vaJbaaYkMDPtVzPJwmd0tSg3sXNDU lXcphOgTaWgiVrnkBPDWoXbkjGp9PS3O27W1GwLxqG5n+xVP2vtsFBG1IBPoNTpGRS7K eRy5w6Wx8de29tC7h1k4Md4ZVCe4WSHKOUNT+qXUDzCB4ozgZaUlDffa25kNVr4n4ayr MYlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FQr2+CCalKgDrA12cz6kTPFlEgpE4NTSJBHk84k9KlA=; b=rJklV6NIt3PPQdIaiwJCkD/204hCDID+80KNCN3jHaf+hbDSd/WJgTn94FoDlIPmjy oLv1htDjo0W4lzu7YrlAEXE6xXtI1am8BdN2WJSKon/WdBken9CXlY/+mt+KZLN7Wid/ ZwDU8vkOioVi5bYaHaCloPldHHEeN8lhWtMtsZJz2E6kF/yRSVgY0K7wSxyxP4S5KOED Lcg2Fuas0NOwn2f8k2PoNc2sCLG27g0bBAfxPKnvXyJDhdBdcuyKrhhPg6Tvo56Gs4E1 F1GVlu0B7zrfLc8UKZPZnXlHzITwyBtprnCCwA9ZtUKaQLd51CUNf/rKfiLCuM0SPOxy kGtw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXSYPvIAODQEDbH4z73rEnorq+SCF89T7w6HE178UBVCRgmZS6m QntNaUZDMwhTWdmRRD+x7jiPGknzqq/GyOiQ8Zo2Nw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxjWDEwbkiE2ZsJXoDXKy8bI8tnus4ZqI8PGuQRfd0/qEvKV0AcHKVrO9J3tvHAbI2QR49LL7GHmT1tgXzHaKI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8484:: with SMTP id c4mr19844087plo.223.1566839045123; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:04:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190812215052.71840-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190812215052.71840-12-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190813082744.xmzmm4j675rqiz47@willie-the-truck> <20190813170829.c3lryb6va3eopxd7@willie-the-truck> <20190824112542.7guulvdenm35ihs7@willie-the-truck> In-Reply-To: From: Nick Desaulniers Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 10:03:53 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] arm64: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h To: Miguel Ojeda Cc: Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , Sedat Dilek , Josh Poimboeuf , Yonghong Song , clang-built-linux , Catalin Marinas , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Andrey Konovalov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Enrico Weigelt , Suzuki K Poulose , Thomas Gleixner , Masayoshi Mizuma , Shaokun Zhang , Alexios Zavras , Allison Randal , Linux ARM , linux-kernel , Network Development , bpf@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 5:48 AM Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 1:25 PM Will Deacon wrote: > > > > Which bit are you pinging about? This patch (12/16) has been in -next for a > > while and is queued in the arm64 tree for 5.4. The Oops/boot issue is > > addressed in patch 14 which probably needs to be sent as a separate patch > > (with a commit message) if it's targetting 5.3 and, I assume, routed via > > somebody like akpm. > > I was pinging about the bit I was quoting, i.e. whether the Oops in > the cover letter was #14 indeed. Also, since Nick said he wanted to > get this ASAP through compiler-attributes, I assumed he wanted it to > be in 5.3, but I have not seen the independent patch. > > Since he seems busy, I will write a better commit message myself and > send it to Linus next week. Sorry, very hectic week here last week. I'll try to get the import bit split off, collect the acks/reviewed-by tags, and resend a v2 of the series this week. -- Thanks, ~Nick Desaulniers