From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
Dongdong Wang <wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com>,
Jiang Wang <jiang.wang@bytedance.com>,
Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>,
Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch bpf-next v8 11/16] udp: implement ->read_sock() for sockmap
Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2021 22:08:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpVG3Sd=jA4jdt6HFRr8rKn7DRdWRyHBd9O3q0DuubMsRg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6065619aa26d1_938bb2085e@john-XPS-13-9370.notmuch>
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:01 PM John Fastabend
<john.fastabend@gmail.com> wrote:
> This 'else if' is always true if above is false right? Would be
> impler and clearer IMO as,
>
> if (used <= 0) {
> if (!copied)
> copied = used;
> break;
> }
> copied += used;
>
> I don't see anyway for used to be great than skb->len.
Yes, slightly better. Please feel free to submit a patch by yourself,
like always your patches are welcome.
Please also remember to submit a patch to address the name
TCP_ESTABLISHED, or literally any code you feel uncomfortable
with. I am actually comfortable with what they are, hence not
motivated to make a change.
BTW, please try to group your reviews in one round, it is
completely a waste of time to address your review one during
each update.
On my side, I need to adjust the cover letter, rebase the
whole patchset, and manually add your ACK's. On your side,
you have to read this again and again. On other people side,
they just see more than a dozen patches flooding in the mailing
list again and again. In the end, everyone's time is wasted, this
can be avoided if you just try to group as many reviews as possible
together. I certainly do not mind waiting for more time just to get
more reviews in one round.
And please do not give any ACK unless you are comfortable with
the whole patchset, because otherwise I have to add it manually.
It is not too late to give one single ACK to the whole patchset once
you are comfortable with everything. This would save some traffic
in the mailing list too.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-03 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-31 2:32 [Patch bpf-next v8 00/16] sockmap: introduce BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT and support UDP Cong Wang
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 01/16] skmsg: lock ingress_skb when purging Cong Wang
2021-03-31 22:00 ` John Fastabend
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 02/16] skmsg: introduce a spinlock to protect ingress_msg Cong Wang
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 03/16] net: introduce skb_send_sock() for sock_map Cong Wang
2021-04-01 8:10 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 04/16] skmsg: avoid lock_sock() in sk_psock_backlog() Cong Wang
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 05/16] skmsg: use rcu work for destroying psock Cong Wang
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 06/16] skmsg: use GFP_KERNEL in sk_psock_create_ingress_msg() Cong Wang
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 07/16] sock_map: simplify sock_map_link() a bit Cong Wang
2021-04-01 5:48 ` John Fastabend
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 08/16] sock_map: kill sock_map_link_no_progs() Cong Wang
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 09/16] sock_map: introduce BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT Cong Wang
2021-04-01 5:51 ` John Fastabend
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 10/16] sock: introduce sk->sk_prot->psock_update_sk_prot() Cong Wang
2021-04-02 10:16 ` Jakub Sitnicki
2021-04-03 5:13 ` Cong Wang
2021-04-05 8:25 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-06 18:12 ` John Fastabend
2021-04-06 18:30 ` Cong Wang
2021-04-06 21:07 ` John Fastabend
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 11/16] udp: implement ->read_sock() for sockmap Cong Wang
2021-04-01 6:00 ` John Fastabend
2021-04-03 5:08 ` Cong Wang [this message]
2021-04-03 6:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 12/16] skmsg: extract __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() and tcp_bpf_wait_data() Cong Wang
2021-04-01 16:36 ` John Fastabend
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 13/16] udp: implement udp_bpf_recvmsg() for sockmap Cong Wang
2021-04-01 16:24 ` John Fastabend
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 14/16] sock_map: update sock type checks for UDP Cong Wang
2021-04-01 6:02 ` John Fastabend
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 15/16] selftests/bpf: add a test case for udp sockmap Cong Wang
2021-03-31 2:32 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 16/16] selftests/bpf: add a test case for loading BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT Cong Wang
2021-04-01 16:51 ` [Patch bpf-next v8 00/16] sockmap: introduce BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT and support UDP John Fastabend
2021-04-01 18:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAM_iQpVG3Sd=jA4jdt6HFRr8rKn7DRdWRyHBd9O3q0DuubMsRg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=jakub@cloudflare.com \
--cc=jiang.wang@bytedance.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=lmb@cloudflare.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).