bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "Yunsheng Lin" <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	"David Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Vladimir Oltean" <olteanv@gmail.com>,
	"Alexei Starovoitov" <ast@kernel.org>,
	"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andriin@fb.com>,
	"Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Wei Wang" <weiwan@google.com>,
	"Cong Wang ." <cong.wang@bytedance.com>,
	"Taehee Yoo" <ap420073@gmail.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Network Developers" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linuxarm@openeuler.org, "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, "Jamal Hadi Salim" <jhs@mojatatu.com>,
	"Jiri Pirko" <jiri@resnulli.us>,
	"Andrii Nakryiko" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	"Martin KaFai Lau" <kafai@fb.com>,
	"Song Liu" <songliubraving@fb.com>, "Yonghong Song" <yhs@fb.com>,
	"John Fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
	kpsingh@kernel.org, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Jonas Bonn" <jonas.bonn@netrounds.com>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Michael Zhivich" <mzhivich@akamai.com>,
	"Josh Hunt" <johunt@akamai.com>, "Jike Song" <albcamus@gmail.com>,
	"Kehuan Feng" <kehuan.feng@gmail.com>,
	"Ahmad Fatoum" <a.fatoum@pengutronix.de>,
	atenart@kernel.org, "Alexander Duyck" <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>,
	"Hillf Danton" <hdanton@sina.com>,
	jgross@suse.com, JKosina@suse.com,
	"Michal Kubecek" <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
	"Björn Töpel" <bjorn@kernel.org>,
	"Alexander Lobakin" <alobakin@pm.me>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v8 1/3] net: sched: fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:57:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM_iQpXZNASp7+kA=OoCVbXuReAtOzHnqMn8kFUVfi9_qWe_kw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210514163923.53f39888@kicinski-fedora-PC1C0HJN>

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 4:39 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 16:36:16 -0700 Cong Wang wrote:
> > > @@ -176,8 +202,15 @@ static inline bool qdisc_run_begin(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
> > >  static inline void qdisc_run_end(struct Qdisc *qdisc)
> > >  {
> > >         write_seqcount_end(&qdisc->running);
> > > -       if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK)
> > > +       if (qdisc->flags & TCQ_F_NOLOCK) {
> > >                 spin_unlock(&qdisc->seqlock);
> > > +
> > > +               if (unlikely(test_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED,
> > > +                                     &qdisc->state))) {
> > > +                       clear_bit(__QDISC_STATE_MISSED, &qdisc->state);
> >
> > We have test_and_clear_bit() which is atomic, test_bit()+clear_bit()
> > is not.
>
> It doesn't have to be atomic, right? I asked to split the test because
> test_and_clear is a locked op on x86, test by itself is not.

It depends on whether you expect the code under the true condition
to run once or multiple times, something like:

if (test_bit()) {
  clear_bit();
  // this code may run multiple times
}

With the atomic test_and_clear_bit(), it only runs once:

if (test_and_clear_bit()) {
  // this code runs once
}

This is why __netif_schedule() uses test_and_set_bit() instead of
test_bit()+set_bit().

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-14 23:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-14  2:26 [PATCH net v8 0/3] fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-14  2:26 ` [PATCH net v8 1/3] net: sched: " Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-14 23:36   ` Cong Wang
2021-05-14 23:39     ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-05-14 23:57       ` Cong Wang [this message]
2021-05-15  0:17         ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-05-15  2:25           ` Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-18  0:49             ` Cong Wang
2021-05-14  2:26 ` [PATCH net v8 2/3] net: sched: fix tx action rescheduling issue during deactivation Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-14  2:26 ` [PATCH net v8 3/3] net: sched: fix tx action reschedule issue with stopped queue Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-14  2:56 ` [PATCH net v8 0/3] fix packet stuck problem for lockless qdisc Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-14  3:16 Yunsheng Lin
2021-05-14  3:16 ` [PATCH net v8 1/3] net: sched: " Yunsheng Lin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM_iQpXZNASp7+kA=OoCVbXuReAtOzHnqMn8kFUVfi9_qWe_kw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com \
    --cc=JKosina@suse.com \
    --cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=albcamus@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
    --cc=alobakin@pm.me \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=atenart@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cong.wang@bytedance.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=hdanton@sina.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jhs@mojatatu.com \
    --cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=johunt@akamai.com \
    --cc=jonas.bonn@netrounds.com \
    --cc=kafai@fb.com \
    --cc=kehuan.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@openeuler.org \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
    --cc=mzhivich@akamai.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=weiwan@google.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).