From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A891EC31E40 for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF282133F for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:08:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="XlyDTQw/" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730939AbfHOJIu (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 05:08:50 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f196.google.com ([209.85.208.196]:33666 "EHLO mail-lj1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730212AbfHOJIu (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 05:08:50 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f196.google.com with SMTP id z17so1669523ljz.0; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:08:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=0UE6srbxTSzeQEGUqQmtIA5ElC0/7wYx3fPkt29gctA=; b=XlyDTQw/LApnV+/jl3INSQ0k5kkAC/D/oC26vZ9uWE9MEg3xW3781+knczAv4Aaf2a dDTP8F6TCi/OyI8bPVdVCN57ntl7atgf2pmtMC4foq3XyLYv54jwaSDTyigDmaFJTuLN HTYTpKOlcK2VdKCMk8hfpSwDNOy1+V/tesvKx3CEkop4q6eSIwmZjdmvxmfgW0VLzJpo VpiFsTYq9biPd7m6Uq3jDpyl2233BEL5+bvbFpJGe+zqxEAugwnqxL34d4WJhoZJQ/2G QKS1ERct7SoOBMBQ65iClNzCB5N9LYZ54uUvZj8xrYylAk3KOoTygKBs5tRFQQ6eXQyL LmQQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0UE6srbxTSzeQEGUqQmtIA5ElC0/7wYx3fPkt29gctA=; b=a+voiIiLIwi5NsBzcfZcSslBsoILh0dphdCbQOOf5lK8bBWSYkdpfKPvs6ztlhxx2e 2Mxr5KeTgPvNCha+zpoECKnaV90VC+pSX5TDA08D/dpaaWJH3VpOjzLgJnA5wwhyVvTs TbzIpwJ+3lRb6kSzCZPekrVt34cT1Jcqic3k5ItprtlauVuSuVy57hxDnZ15wYGQpH9j kNuSKcgdXEvPw8kYxVHwVfUMvTc1eDzwDZEN6zVsxlKS4H4gzYHHp8MlgZx+UWjDrc+M E6kjtfOqhUs1uvd8YQDCngTslf4aJyK5Y/NYKEPxINf/1hKAfvQTwsJQhK2LFhUXVez4 bP2w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUuxxQqzmMhUYuqLaesWinnzDaUr2XuaD8PMc+k2cqAGUZEon9j gRsOKlRi8nuiuIWwe+sULCBIjh9cv2nHbVeBoa0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMEUAJffcAHkjsEhd8NMusg/7M2UPC/oaiZA76NFZ6YUgtOx0nJ3OvlVQjfSslMzS/Nsbw4g+olqzqauqWEC8= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9252:: with SMTP id v18mr1033100ljg.93.1565860127855; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:08:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190812215052.71840-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190812215052.71840-12-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190813082744.xmzmm4j675rqiz47@willie-the-truck> <20190813170829.c3lryb6va3eopxd7@willie-the-truck> In-Reply-To: From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:08:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] arm64: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , Sedat Dilek , Josh Poimboeuf , Yonghong Song , clang-built-linux , Catalin Marinas , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Andrey Konovalov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Enrico Weigelt , Suzuki K Poulose , Thomas Gleixner , Masayoshi Mizuma , Shaokun Zhang , Alexios Zavras , Allison Randal , Linux ARM , linux-kernel , Network Development , bpf@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:20 AM Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > This lone patch of the series is just cosmetic, but patch 14/16 fixes > a real boot issue: > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/619 > Miguel, I'd like to get that one landed ASAP; the rest are just for consistency. Ah, interesting. It would be best to have sent that one independently to the others, plus adding a commit message mentioning this in particular. Let's talk about that in the thread. > Miguel, how do you want to take the rest of these patches? Will picked > up the arm64 one, I think the SuperH one got picked up. There was > feedback to add more info to individual commits' commit messages. Yes, I told Will I would pick up whatever is not already picked up by individual maintainers. > I kept these tree wide changes separate to improve the likelihood that > they'd backport to stable cleanly, but could always squash if you'd > prefer to have 1 patch instead of a series. Just let me know. Since you already did the splitting work, let's take advantage of it. I prefer them to be split anyway, since that gives maintainers a chance to pick them up individually if they prefer to do so. Cheers, Miguel