From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC90C433FF for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824E32063F for ; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 09:12:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QElReFqQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731007AbfHOJM2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 05:12:28 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-f193.google.com ([209.85.208.193]:39290 "EHLO mail-lj1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731003AbfHOJM2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Aug 2019 05:12:28 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-f193.google.com with SMTP id x4so1645470ljj.6; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:12:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/iZpzZ2apqtPNAYN3rBQkZr4GG5AMuxH/SW/Plc3ffA=; b=QElReFqQP1GK1jybq9AdaL5hGB8HmAAs0wfsjh6CmTuxeo6TEfpfCDoP/+HHCVw2A1 3i3+mnn+llz0xTIikJA14Xpr1gVhFAfaTwJmRt5SqcsiF1KeM0jPzS5lvDKb8OMOh+GY i1vgJaEZIKCh8lSCkUui0aAgkjIg4L206m/sGzk9t6O6QQvrLU8yWFknvH19qAjVW4Fd nF9QzblURTEbZ/R1/afeTL+rln+KXYM3Ne/zhEr90OEO3jzL4Ikq8WJTHukdGQn/wyhN adWSLc2bj5U6uGjvYIJzNFyX46OWUcpQmn4mMK+8HUZ346uWMznEAPX5nqG0MRJz032l rD3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/iZpzZ2apqtPNAYN3rBQkZr4GG5AMuxH/SW/Plc3ffA=; b=Kd+whwjLkcwJZCSnANBkFC9w2J9s2rLouK+R2KdlSsJyQWXOJYasCYcBLdY5chUqA2 TYvuxjfF+DlWnml03GpjlKmcqSjmalkREne4+n1CydD8g4HcMNsCfu7+EFDl/EJHzXOZ w/8GGri/fuVHlgQual3reAt6R031QguJDc8HPyoe8EpjZmc3MZOv10fCgm6cuEP71dSI jVMxH7Q4/P2NEJ10LAlTzMeRnlfOb6PyJKRlZbGAaFiIL94LVi2h+BH5WxB1U4hrS9cW FvO9ZdtEdT5IDsgvohb5jJyZas5lK3p3dFVthl+BgUUKDMIPOvfHvsLCe74DbAL36aI2 dU6w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWFjkRMngKj5LhO5LcIymFkJsGTLhD7gavEylZdg8bb8wCrwKkE awYANU2xpYdBMNerIM4r5MX9fhklScco9SsRk/U= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyGUoGw9duO+xloOL4EihgDXFOKCU7bXBE4DDDHi6q2U92avBXabuArt3Vzj00ddjUnjW901Y7mAjAa9KYeXcg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:ca:: with SMTP id 10mr2132619ljr.144.1565860346166; Thu, 15 Aug 2019 02:12:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190812215052.71840-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190812215052.71840-12-ndesaulniers@google.com> <20190813082744.xmzmm4j675rqiz47@willie-the-truck> <20190813170829.c3lryb6va3eopxd7@willie-the-truck> In-Reply-To: From: Miguel Ojeda Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 11:12:15 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/16] arm64: prefer __section from compiler_attributes.h To: Nick Desaulniers Cc: Will Deacon , Andrew Morton , Sedat Dilek , Josh Poimboeuf , Yonghong Song , clang-built-linux , Catalin Marinas , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Andrey Konovalov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Enrico Weigelt , Suzuki K Poulose , Thomas Gleixner , Masayoshi Mizuma , Shaokun Zhang , Alexios Zavras , Allison Randal , Linux ARM , linux-kernel , Network Development , bpf@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 11:08 AM Miguel Ojeda wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:20 AM Nick Desaulniers > wrote: > > > > This lone patch of the series is just cosmetic, but patch 14/16 fixes > > a real boot issue: > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/619 > > Miguel, I'd like to get that one landed ASAP; the rest are just for consistency. > > Ah, interesting. It would be best to have sent that one independently > to the others, plus adding a commit message mentioning this in > particular. Let's talk about that in the thread. Btw, I guess that is the Oops you were mentioning in the cover letter? Cheers, Miguel