From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F508C433E0 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 18:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2500E206A1 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 18:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="gNDFwlsX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2405744AbgE1S37 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 14:29:59 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:25686 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405803AbgE1S36 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 May 2020 14:29:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1590690597; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=i0Vd3Rmv/FJ0VzEZAhAOa4CEuK81Nugu5T6/vtWTnzw=; b=gNDFwlsXKhpl3BXE047+U2KY8pzlZEvZAc323yIVSxAfN3lXJXFTIJWQzNTugAp3KLIGhA J+YlyLSDO17xXM4mMvP93YeTPJe5WZGRNuOdrge+2byMhMkTMVcf8+mHYiRE7b8UtI5dp3 sxcYG0ALJ9EnJavO4SQBK4hZgd0nX8c= Received: from mail-ot1-f70.google.com (mail-ot1-f70.google.com [209.85.210.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-29-DbLcpSezPiyk9Yj7jI0yAQ-1; Thu, 28 May 2020 14:29:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: DbLcpSezPiyk9Yj7jI0yAQ-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f70.google.com with SMTP id v6so1766664ots.12 for ; Thu, 28 May 2020 11:29:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i0Vd3Rmv/FJ0VzEZAhAOa4CEuK81Nugu5T6/vtWTnzw=; b=OntYvPYRwrHXRymu4zxgn2pykw7sILJkKUcXsQqu7OQzqwNVT6whc4TtPr4ZXqOv0G UPjT5YXs1+p3JXQmlica0/DzslzQB/UPlui3LtG7qoWasje1+gy3uCc6puArMJbURZaU FSJ+dbo3+XWgD+yZ+pb8d+yhCXs9h1HAGkWSGuvHrTAcoYHhm1BmDKVOXJGyACxRpJXy FmSfRx2ZfkhgCma/2772L5tHuQikO2MfJdfB6Aa9J0Bv9+cp733Orjr5JrNNY5lkA3pq aiwQ54W30iBhIjZ1dVP7j+E0zyu7+zSJSQheASNzbopR+CB68mUWYYWb/a5uO7aNS+UY KAPw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532d7yakliBLfdQZxEcM1ap6g31BhS0xrdktutac0Pqn+q5OZttR AszaJeFvKDDjSe6ciTlYrhiZZaWr/aLfFtZqNcL+xX0EKBSg3J9U3Zf+KjOL0r4L/oGH7Zid/9h VCQg28IbH/Z6/idHQ+kbXW+htuLt3 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2155:: with SMTP id r21mr3468291otd.187.1590690592714; Thu, 28 May 2020 11:29:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzg4T0ToaCnYPW94GkNCgylY/4Ew6dw2U7zjptPDZEbgJaQv0LDiIcZmgltwjOWCVFVaLpICn3DsZX1DQVw7yo= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:2155:: with SMTP id r21mr3468272otd.187.1590690592491; Thu, 28 May 2020 11:29:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200528100557.20489f04@redhat.com> <20200528105631.GE3115014@kroah.com> <20200528161437.x3e2ddxmj6nlhvv7@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> <20200528181546.eqzcc5kq5y6hnbcu@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> In-Reply-To: <20200528181546.eqzcc5kq5y6hnbcu@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> From: Yauheni Kaliuta Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 21:29:36 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: split -extras target to -static and -gen To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Shuah Khan , Greg KH , Jiri Benc , shuah , Andrii Nakryiko , bpf , Jiri Olsa , Andrii Nakryiko , Daniel Borkmann , "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Hi! On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 9:16 PM Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 11:07:09AM -0600, Shuah Khan wrote: [...] > > > > Here is what CI users are requesting: > > > > - ability to install bpf test with other selftests using kselftest > > install. The common framework is in place and with minor changes > > to bpf test Makefile, we can make this happen. Others and myself > > are willing to work on this, so we can get bpf test coverage in > > test rings. > > so you're saying that bpf maintainers and all bpf developers now > would need to incorporate new 'make install' step to their workflow > because some unknown CI system that is not even functional decided > to do 'make install' ? > That's exactly my point about selfish CI developers who put their > needs in front of bpf community of developers. May be, it can work both ways to make everybody happy :) (I haven't seen yet fundamental problems why not).