> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 11:03:58 +0200 Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Can you please check if the code above is aligned to current requirements or if
> > it is missing something?
> > If this code it is fine, I guess we have two option here:
> > - integrate the commits above in xdp multi-buff series (posting v15) and work on
> >   the verfier code in parallel (if xdp_mb_pointer helper is not required from day0)
> > - integrate verfier changes in xdp multi-buff series, drop bpf_xdp_load_bytes
> >   helper (probably we will still need bpf_xdp_store_bytes) and introduce
> >   bpf_xdp_pointer as new ebpf helper.
> 
> It wasn't clear to me that we wanted bpf_xdp_load_bytes() to exist.
> But FWIW no preference here.
> 

ack, same here. Any other opinion about it?

Regards,
Lorenzo