bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	"rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
	Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	"andrii@kernel.org" <andrii@kernel.org>,
	Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de" <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 0/4] introduce HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG for bpf_prog_pack
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 00:07:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkvqtvNFtzDNkEhy@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6AA91984-7DF3-4820-91DF-DD6CA251B638@fb.com>

On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 10:22:00PM +0000, Song Liu wrote:
> >> Please fix the underlying issues instead of papering over them and
> >> creating a huge maintainance burden for others.
> 
> After reading the code a little more, I wonder what would be best strategy. 
> IIUC, most of the kernel is not ready for huge page backed vmalloc memory.
> For example, all the module_alloc cannot work with huge pages at the moment.
> And the error Paul Menzel reported in drm_fb_helper.c will probably hit 
> powerpc with 5.17 kernel as-is? (trace attached below) 
> 
> Right now, we have VM_NO_HUGE_VMAP to let a user to opt out of huge pages. 
> However, given there are so many users of vmalloc, vzalloc, etc., we 
> probably do need a flag for the user to opt-in? 
> 
> Does this make sense? Any recommendations are really appreciated. 

I think there is multiple aspects here:

 - if we think that the kernel is not ready for hugepage backed vmalloc
   in general we need to disable it in powerpc for now.
 - if we think even in the longer run only some users can cope with
   hugepage backed vmalloc we need to turn it into an opt-in in
   general and not just for x86
 - there still to appear various unresolved underlying x86 specific
   issues that need to be fixed either way

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-05  7:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20220330225642.1163897-1-song@kernel.org>
     [not found] ` <20220330225642.1163897-3-song@kernel.org>
2022-03-30 23:40   ` [PATCH bpf 2/4] vmalloc: introduce HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-03-31  0:26     ` Song Liu
     [not found] ` <20220330225642.1163897-2-song@kernel.org>
2022-03-30 23:47   ` [PATCH bpf 1/4] x86: disable HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC Thomas Gleixner
     [not found] ` <20220330225642.1163897-4-song@kernel.org>
2022-03-30 23:54   ` [PATCH bpf 3/4] x86: select HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG for X86_64 Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-31  0:30     ` Song Liu
     [not found] ` <20220330225642.1163897-5-song@kernel.org>
2022-03-31  0:00   ` [PATCH bpf 4/4] bpf: use __vmalloc_node_range() with VM_TRY_HUGE_VMAP for bpf_prog_pack Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-31  0:31     ` Song Liu
2022-03-31  0:04 ` [PATCH bpf 0/4] introduce HAVE_ARCH_HUGE_VMALLOC_FLAG " Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-03-31  0:46   ` Song Liu
2022-03-31 16:19     ` Edgecombe, Rick P
2022-03-31  5:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-31 23:59   ` Song Liu
2022-04-01 22:22     ` Song Liu
2022-04-05  7:07       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2022-04-05 23:54         ` Song Liu
2022-04-07 19:57           ` Song Liu
2022-04-08 10:08             ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-04-08 21:22               ` Song Liu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YkvqtvNFtzDNkEhy@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
    --cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).