From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
Kernel Team <Kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/12] libbpf: auto-detect btf_id of raw_tracepoint
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 04:53:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b16deef3-c736-1979-2ce8-6b03b426be67@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEf4BzZsz-6ftv628bk9LtEFr1qUoARL32x-kGagi7esOBURyA@mail.gmail.com>
On 10/11/19 9:38 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:29 PM Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/11/19 5:40 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>>>> But even if kernel supports attach_btf_id, I think users still need to
>>>> opt in into specifying attach_btf_id by libbpf. Think about existing
>>>> raw_tp programs that are using bpf_probe_read() because they were not
>>>> created with this kernel feature in mind. They will suddenly stop
>>>> working without any of user's fault.
>>>
>>> This one is excellent catch.
>>> loop1.c should have caught it, since it has
>>> SEC("raw_tracepoint/kfree_skb")
>>> {
>>> int nested_loops(volatile struct pt_regs* ctx)
>>> .. = PT_REGS_RC(ctx);
>>>
>>> and verifier would have rejected it.
>>> But the way the test is written it's not using libbpf's autodetect
>>> of program type, so everything is passing.
>>
>> With:
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c
>> b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c
>> index 1c01ee2600a9..e27156dce10d 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_verif_scale.c
>> @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ void test_bpf_verif_scale(void)
>> */
>> { "pyperf600_nounroll.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT },
>>
>> - { "loop1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT },
>> + { "loop1.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_UNSPEC},
>> { "loop2.o", BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT },
>>
>> libbpf prog auto-detection kicks in and ...
>> # ./test_progs -n 3/10
>> libbpf: load bpf program failed: Permission denied
>> libbpf: -- BEGIN DUMP LOG ---
>> libbpf:
>> raw_tp 'kfree_skb' doesn't have 10-th argument
>> invalid bpf_context access off=80 size=8
>>
>> Good :) The verifier is doing its job.
>
> oh, another super intuitive error from verifier ;) 10th argument, what?..
I know, but there is no env->linfo and no insn_idx to call
verbose_linfo() from there. That's even bigger refactoring
that I'd rather to later.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-12 4:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-10 4:14 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/12] bpf: revolutionize bpf tracing Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/12] bpf: add typecast to raw_tracepoints to help BTF generation Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/12] bpf: add typecast to bpf helpers " Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/12] bpf: process in-kernel BTF Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 17:56 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/12] bpf: add attach_btf_id attribute to program load Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 17:58 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/12] libbpf: auto-detect btf_id of raw_tracepoint Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 18:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-11 18:07 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-12 0:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-12 1:29 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-12 4:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-12 4:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2019-10-12 4:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/12] bpf: implement accurate raw_tp context access via BTF Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 18:31 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-11 23:13 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/12] bpf: attach raw_tp program with BTF via type name Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 18:44 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10 4:14 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/12] bpf: add support for BTF pointers to interpreter Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-10 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/12] bpf: add support for BTF pointers to x86 JIT Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 18:48 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/12] bpf: check types of arguments passed into helpers Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 19:02 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-12 1:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-12 4:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/12] bpf: disallow bpf_probe_read[_str] helpers Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 19:03 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2019-10-10 4:15 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 12/12] selftests/bpf: add kfree_skb raw_tp test Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-10 11:07 ` Ido Schimmel
2019-10-10 19:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-10-11 19:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b16deef3-c736-1979-2ce8-6b03b426be67@fb.com \
--to=ast@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).