From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
Peter Oskolkov <posk@google.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf] selftests: bpf: test_lwt_ip_encap: really disable rp_filter
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 10:40:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1cdd9d469f09ea6e01e9c89a6071c79b7380f89.1632386362.git.jbenc@redhat.com> (raw)
It's not enough to set net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0, that does not override
a greater rp_filter value on the individual interfaces. We also need to set
net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter=0 before creating the interfaces. That way,
they'll also get their own rp_filter value of zero.
Fixes: 0fde56e4385b0 ("selftests: bpf: add test_lwt_ip_encap selftest")
Signed-off-by: Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh
index 59ea56945e6c..b497bb85b667 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lwt_ip_encap.sh
@@ -112,6 +112,14 @@ setup()
ip netns add "${NS2}"
ip netns add "${NS3}"
+ # rp_filter gets confused by what these tests are doing, so disable it
+ ip netns exec ${NS1} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0
+ ip netns exec ${NS2} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0
+ ip netns exec ${NS3} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0
+ ip netns exec ${NS1} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter=0
+ ip netns exec ${NS2} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter=0
+ ip netns exec ${NS3} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.default.rp_filter=0
+
ip link add veth1 type veth peer name veth2
ip link add veth3 type veth peer name veth4
ip link add veth5 type veth peer name veth6
@@ -236,11 +244,6 @@ setup()
ip -netns ${NS1} -6 route add ${IPv6_GRE}/128 dev veth5 via ${IPv6_6} ${VRF}
ip -netns ${NS2} -6 route add ${IPv6_GRE}/128 dev veth7 via ${IPv6_8} ${VRF}
- # rp_filter gets confused by what these tests are doing, so disable it
- ip netns exec ${NS1} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0
- ip netns exec ${NS2} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0
- ip netns exec ${NS3} sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter=0
-
TMPFILE=$(mktemp /tmp/test_lwt_ip_encap.XXXXXX)
sleep 1 # reduce flakiness
--
2.18.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-09-23 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-23 8:40 Jiri Benc [this message]
2021-09-28 7:40 ` [PATCH bpf] selftests: bpf: test_lwt_ip_encap: really disable rp_filter patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1cdd9d469f09ea6e01e9c89a6071c79b7380f89.1632386362.git.jbenc@redhat.com \
--to=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=posk@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).