From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-qk1-f178.google.com (mail-qk1-f178.google.com [209.85.222.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9620C52F92 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 19:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.178 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710532506; cv=none; b=k0lUKmLuriKFrVkv2C/CayvHWSv7O2lNAlcoUQSJYBQb4ztmf/UA+K5B8dRkhyv5tuY1EcQ08i9m3cJTyq+G5f/G9sFkubaoJcV3xMq/HQVmYNX9OGW3egQivz1sZWxmgiJKDa5wMim32FQZZw4JIFt49PdfEPEK4tSIWhIji+k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710532506; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CZwUyc/DMM0Uny3U5TTGXkC9yXTk8fyaov4ApURGlJU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=DiFxOD7COUbZF50wqIBOi02QLnC3sGOyC/7PaKMRqJf2qVaFCsnuYA2Ha+10sygqEDNJEIsFazFRa7cHKZuP+xYP2GfQF1Khx+e7Juak1vC1AXo3dsKn84bLZNW7mWQM+vY2V0PrpcRSzgx3++p35SAB+CyYWAtortROicS4FHU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=cloudflare.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cloudflare.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com header.i=@cloudflare.com header.b=ZRc8at8i; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.222.178 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=cloudflare.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cloudflare.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cloudflare.com header.i=@cloudflare.com header.b="ZRc8at8i" Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-789e6ceaff1so78147485a.0 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:55:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cloudflare.com; s=google09082023; t=1710532503; x=1711137303; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hFCxDEQwJlvWrjzvbkqgNENtA83xO4o1dn3KyfRTRKA=; b=ZRc8at8iONxvknmBCFFyHlu9gFSFLwBb453B9kYYGuRULPGhJLb37TucWku2c10dKs hYOcYEnMKNGmKutNCt3x2hGlVlLo+cF/Ub+77ZN61SK1EsVO8qySOu5uFv1RwrqMAmi6 Di+lcr7tZdfpwR9qxa+bznu3bm4sRwLEJoVj1ARHfsZXbpHw9qDp8vopNJy7iAQeXn2t OZq5n9oNy05qJz5prXOz+5b4gxmrwnLatar7jkcJ8l3KsgwurtQ8vWhDT2B8AWbbCbdw sgS0M5tXyGkpxcTk4y2KUfEK2duQNKKaZpah0wD/nOFtU9acliHcH+SmbszcNxtbf/Gl AB0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710532503; x=1711137303; h=content-disposition:mime-version:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=hFCxDEQwJlvWrjzvbkqgNENtA83xO4o1dn3KyfRTRKA=; b=URKkkM17uy38lzQ1l/G7sRkYerFZ1y7U5ygoYSTfxHd2pA7L/uYzjL0YKZS4KIgqX0 f0pYt1onnuxohUhaS3u/MVBW1TkjJubufI9fFDEu6n/lfm/AbZOq5ONF1k3LczM6CrJ8 x0RcL3IHEBh+7Tvf1Jt0mlGIn4Y344wFOvr7kJSJG2Yn0+Vku9pZAYYuxUTSB/lZ3279 aQ/oJaaydwr7Ges1O17iPnbU1y+viGfdLyk7T6dFMf5BAt3WUggt0p03zO8s1oyPaegX Hqm0Fztgde7e7kD7pFpNg0mDaWHj10NdND+nMXb3rjZUqUtF+VBV4kXygQ02uvXUPDe2 QUuQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVXPoH9Zdqg0Sohs0H10gEYZtghbMRjdkf1eTC8nUqC0ghSvy+GXPiWCecU+cJXnoL5QrULl9zMTKUpSC75d5gBjIMy X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxxtZu8I/8pFmdOo/Y9aDbqdfYAjOJsrgiYaQHl1E3C7avcUt+z DkDUrzEzY85+1mppSuiyXSauWpiBRmnsCw4Rn73KkI2usztGKAVgpbC/M1EU+J8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFjd6KHONFC5gxvbd85NmSgiMqQ0lkwBquMR6XDCX/5Tlz40CkSaVE6adtcrZ4M3JLDNtVK/g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:158f:b0:788:49fd:a3de with SMTP id d15-20020a05620a158f00b0078849fda3demr8820691qkk.16.1710532503509; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debian.debian ([2a09:bac5:7a49:1046::19f:c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7-20020a05620a136700b0078863e0f829sm1405472qkl.12.2024.03.15.12.55.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:55:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 12:55:00 -0700 From: Yan Zhai To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Jiri Pirko , Simon Horman , Daniel Borkmann , Lorenzo Bianconi , Coco Li , Wei Wang , Alexander Duyck , Hannes Frederic Sowa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Joel Fernandes , "Paul E. McKenney" , Toke =?utf-8?Q?H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen?= , Alexei Starovoitov , Steven Rostedt , mark.rutland@arm.com, Jesper Dangaard Brouer Subject: [PATCH v4 net 0/3] Report RCU QS for busy network kthreads Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline This changeset fixes a common problem for busy networking kthreads. These threads, e.g. NAPI threads, typically will do: * polling a batch of packets * if there are more work, call cond_resched to allow scheduling * continue to poll more packets when rx queue is not empty We observed this being a problem in production, since it can block RCU tasks from making progress under heavy load. Investigation indicates that just calling cond_resched is insufficient for RCU tasks to reach quiescent states. This at least affects NAPI threads, napi_busy_loop, and also cpumap kthread for now. By reporting RCU QSes in these kthreads periodically before cond_resched, the blocked RCU waiters can correctly progress. Instead of just reporting QS for RCU tasks, these code share the same concern as noted in the commit d28139c4e967 ("rcu: Apply RCU-bh QSes to RCU-sched and RCU-preempt when safe"). So report a consolidated QS for safety. It is worth noting that, although this problem is reproducible in napi_busy_loop, it only shows up when setting the polling interval to as high as 2ms, which is far larger than recommended 50us-100us in the documentation. So napi_busy_loop is left untouched. V3: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240314145459.7b3aedf1@kernel.org/t/ V2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/ZeFPz4D121TgvCje@debian.debian/ V1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Zd4DXTyCf17lcTfq@debian.debian/#t changes since v3: * fixed kernel-doc errors changes since v2: * created a helper in rcu header to abstract the behavior * fixed cpumap kthread in addition changes since v1: * disable preemption first as Paul McKenney suggested Yan Zhai (3): rcu: add a helper to report consolidated flavor QS net: report RCU QS on threaded NAPI repolling bpf: report RCU QS in cpumap kthread include/linux/rcupdate.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/bpf/cpumap.c | 3 +++ net/core/dev.c | 3 +++ 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+) -- 2.30.2