bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] bpf: enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_RECVMSG
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 02:08:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d421b6b5-f591-756f-2d73-0fab367a68f5@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKH8qBsU+8495AwcCtQ0fQ8B6mrRLULZ4k3A=XUX3BL0gha_cA@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/29/21 1:59 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 4:52 PM Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> wrote:
>> On 1/28/21 12:28 AM, Stanislav Fomichev wrote:
>>> Those hooks run as BPF_CGROUP_RUN_SA_PROG_LOCK and operate on
>>> a locked socket.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>
>>> ---
>>>    net/core/filter.c                                 | 4 ++++
>>>    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recvmsg4_prog.c | 5 +++++
>>>    tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/recvmsg6_prog.c | 5 +++++
>>>    3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
>>> index ba436b1d70c2..e15d4741719a 100644
>>> --- a/net/core/filter.c
>>> +++ b/net/core/filter.c
>>> @@ -7023,6 +7023,8 @@ sock_addr_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_INET6_BIND:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_INET4_CONNECT:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_INET6_CONNECT:
>>> +             case BPF_CGROUP_UDP4_RECVMSG:
>>> +             case BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_RECVMSG:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_UDP4_SENDMSG:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_INET4_GETPEERNAME:
>>> @@ -7039,6 +7041,8 @@ sock_addr_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_INET6_BIND:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_INET4_CONNECT:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_INET6_CONNECT:
>>> +             case BPF_CGROUP_UDP4_RECVMSG:
>>> +             case BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_RECVMSG:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_UDP4_SENDMSG:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_UDP6_SENDMSG:
>>>                case BPF_CGROUP_INET4_GETPEERNAME:
>>
>> Looks good overall, also thanks for adding the test cases! I was about to apply, but noticed one
>> small nit that would be good to get resolved before that. Above you now list all the attach hooks
>> for sock_addr ctx, so we should just remove the whole switch that tests on prog->expected_attach_type
>> altogether in this last commit.
> Sure, I can resend tomorrow.
> But do you think it's safe and there won't ever be another sock_addr
> hook that runs with an unlocked socket?

Ok, that rationale seems reasonable to keep the series as is. It probably makes sense to add a
small comment at least to the commit log to explain the reasoning, I can do so while applying.
So no need for v3, thanks!

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-29  1:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-27 23:28 [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf: expose bpf_{g,s}etsockopt to more bpf_sock_addr hooks Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-27 23:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/4] bpf: enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_SENDMSG Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-27 23:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/4] bpf: enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_INET{4,6}_GET{PEER,SOCK}NAME Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-27 23:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 3/4] selftests/bpf: rewrite recvmsg{4,6} asm progs to c in test_sock_addr Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-27 23:28 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] bpf: enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_RECVMSG Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-29  0:52   ` Daniel Borkmann
2021-01-29  0:59     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-29  1:08       ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2021-01-29  1:14         ` Stanislav Fomichev
2021-01-29  1:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] bpf: expose bpf_{g,s}etsockopt to more bpf_sock_addr hooks patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d421b6b5-f591-756f-2d73-0fab367a68f5@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/4] bpf: enable bpf_{g,s}etsockopt in BPF_CGROUP_UDP{4,6}_RECVMSG' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).