bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Stellard <tstellar@redhat.com>
To: sedat.dilek@gmail.com
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	dwarves@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btf_encoder: Add extra checks for symbol names
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 06:33:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dae1ec1e-7d19-e4c6-891b-ab774486dbee@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+icZUV9rdRuswqDa9u=VFcqgHp1x+jmz565QCFi=yC0D7hhVQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/13/21 11:50 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 1:28 AM Tom Stellard <tstellar@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 1/12/21 10:40 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>>> When processing kernel image build by clang we can
>>> find some functions without the name, which causes
>>> pahole to segfault.
>>>
>>> Adding extra checks to make sure we always have
>>> function's name defined before using it.
>>>
>>
>> I backported this patch to pahole 1.19, and I can confirm it fixes the
>> segfault for me.
>>
> 
> Thanks for testing.
> 
> Can you give me Git commit-id of LLVM-12 you tried?
> 

I was building with LLVM 11.0.1

-Tom

> - Sedat -
> 
>> -Tom
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>    btf_encoder.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>    1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/btf_encoder.c b/btf_encoder.c
>>> index 333973054b61..17f7a14f2ef0 100644
>>> --- a/btf_encoder.c
>>> +++ b/btf_encoder.c
>>> @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ static int collect_function(struct btf_elf *btfe, GElf_Sym *sym)
>>>
>>>        if (elf_sym__type(sym) != STT_FUNC)
>>>                return 0;
>>> +     if (!elf_sym__name(sym, btfe->symtab))
>>> +             return 0;
>>>
>>>        if (functions_cnt == functions_alloc) {
>>>                functions_alloc = max(1000, functions_alloc * 3 / 2);
>>> @@ -730,9 +732,11 @@ int cu__encode_btf(struct cu *cu, int verbose, bool force,
>>>                if (!has_arg_names(cu, &fn->proto))
>>>                        continue;
>>>                if (functions_cnt) {
>>> -                     struct elf_function *func;
>>> +                     const char *name = function__name(fn, cu);
>>> +                     struct elf_function *func = NULL;
>>>
>>> -                     func = find_function(btfe, function__name(fn, cu));
>>> +                     if (name)
>>> +                             func = find_function(btfe, name);
>>>                        if (!func || func->generated)
>>>                                continue;
>>>                        func->generated = true;
>>>
>>
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-14 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-12 18:40 [PATCH] btf_encoder: Add extra checks for symbol names Jiri Olsa
2021-01-12 19:20 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-01-12 19:47   ` Jiri Olsa
2021-01-12 20:17     ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-13  0:27 ` Tom Stellard
2021-01-14  7:50   ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-14 14:33     ` Tom Stellard [this message]
2021-01-14 14:39       ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-21 13:38   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-21 16:06     ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-21 19:37       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-21 20:53       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-01-22  2:07         ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-22  4:11           ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-01-28 20:00             ` [RFT] pahole 1.20 RC was " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-28 20:57               ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-28 21:11                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-01-28 22:28                   ` Sedat Dilek
2021-02-02  7:48               ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-03  9:03                 ` Sedat Dilek
2021-02-03 10:23                   ` Mark Wielaard
2021-02-03 21:48                     ` Sedat Dilek
2021-02-03 23:21                       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-02-04  1:06                         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-02-04  6:40                         ` Sedat Dilek
2021-01-21 17:37     ` Tom Stellard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=dae1ec1e-7d19-e4c6-891b-ab774486dbee@redhat.com \
    --to=tstellar@redhat.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=sedat.dilek@gmail.com \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).