bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>,
	maximmi@mellanox.com, bjorn.topel@intel.com, ast@kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jonathan.lemon@gmail.com
Cc: rgoodfel@isi.edu, bpf@vger.kernel.org, maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] xsk: publish global consumer pointers when NAPI is finished
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 15:52:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e4702dd2-3968-4740-aa50-9f7cda3bb13e@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1581348432-6747-1-git-send-email-magnus.karlsson@intel.com>

On 2/10/20 4:27 PM, Magnus Karlsson wrote:
> The commit 4b638f13bab4 ("xsk: Eliminate the RX batch size")
> introduced a much more lazy way of updating the global consumer
> pointers from the kernel side, by only doing so when running out of
> entries in the fill or Tx rings (the rings consumed by the
> kernel). This can result in a deadlock with the user application if
> the kernel requires more than one entry to proceed and the application
> cannot put these entries in the fill ring because the kernel has not
> updated the global consumer pointer since the ring is not empty.
> 
> Fix this by publishing the local kernel side consumer pointer whenever
> we have completed Rx or Tx processing in the kernel. This way, user
> space will have an up-to-date view of the consumer pointers whenever it
> gets to execute in the one core case (application and driver on the
> same core), or after a certain number of packets have been processed
> in the two core case (application and driver on different cores).
> 
> A side effect of this patch is that the one core case gets better
> performance, but the two core case gets worse. The reason that the one
> core case improves is that updating the global consumer pointer is
> relatively cheap since the application by definition is not running
> when the kernel is (they are on the same core) and it is beneficial
> for the application, once it gets to run, to have pointers that are
> as up to date as possible since it then can operate on more packets
> and buffers. In the two core case, the most important performance
> aspect is to minimize the number of accesses to the global pointers
> since they are shared between two cores and bounces between the caches
> of those cores. This patch results in more updates to global state,
> which means lower performance in the two core case.
> 
> Fixes: 4b638f13bab4 ("xsk: Eliminate the RX batch size")
> Reported-by: Ryan Goodfellow <rgoodfel@isi.edu>
> Reported-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@mellanox.com>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>

Applied, thanks!

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-11 14:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-10 15:27 [PATCH bpf] xsk: publish global consumer pointers when NAPI is finished Magnus Karlsson
2020-02-10 16:01 ` Jonathan Lemon
2020-02-11  9:53 ` Maxim Mikityanskiy
2020-02-11 14:52 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e4702dd2-3968-4740-aa50-9f7cda3bb13e@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.topel@intel.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=maciejromanfijalkowski@gmail.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=maximmi@mellanox.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgoodfel@isi.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).