bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ast@fb.com
Cc: andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com, kernel-team@fb.com,
	Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: split BTF presence checks into libbpf- and kernel-specific parts
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 00:16:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f031cc95-de56-4701-7eb9-b3128b4722e5@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200312185033.736911-1-andriin@fb.com>

On 3/12/20 7:50 PM, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> Needs for application BTF being present differs between user-space libbpf needs and kernel
> needs. Currently, BTF is mandatory only in kernel only when BPF application is
> using STRUCT_OPS. While libbpf itself relies more heavily on presense of BTF:
>    - for BTF-defined maps;
>    - for Kconfig externs;
>    - for STRUCT_OPS as well.
> 
> Thus, checks for presence and validness of bpf_object's BPF needs to be
> performed separately, which is patch does.
> 
> Fixes: 5327644614a1 ("libbpf: Relax check whether BTF is mandatory")
> Reported-by: Michal Rostecki <mrostecki@opensuse.org>
> Cc: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>

Applied, thanks!

      parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-12 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-12 18:50 [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: split BTF presence checks into libbpf- and kernel-specific parts Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-12 19:58 ` [Potential Spoof] " Martin KaFai Lau
2020-03-12 23:16 ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f031cc95-de56-4701-7eb9-b3128b4722e5@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).