From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27EDC28D18 for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2AC2206DF for ; Wed, 5 Jun 2019 11:51:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=6wind.com header.i=@6wind.com header.b="iJiHvCrA" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726119AbfFELvo (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 07:51:44 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f68.google.com ([209.85.221.68]:40236 "EHLO mail-wr1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727320AbfFELvn (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jun 2019 07:51:43 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f68.google.com with SMTP id p11so14312704wre.7 for ; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 04:51:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; h=reply-to:subject:to:references:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KJ3vSGgyORrvU6rv7Vd/aRyYxs/h9/TJdjXOUcZUHdg=; b=iJiHvCrASg90jqAAcFWfGNGsju46omR2yCfQINcDkRHNjx56o3zWqXT7uvAb/Li9vQ zEGeji+4nSWvp/Utep7wMso1P3EFCVga/j/ZZOnpO7VvgNOyFbrCT1pP3PaPOgDNcPmw JAYzCria9T77Q9XY2FpmNQRRXymO3ROzGV6T5OWr3D+YB29a6emG58FSVyyNHXJBzXdI kTVX4RbLl9mW1GU4O8frTq4hXsh9LQOwKQNYgcW/zJHTpQ+t1FTxQ5Xi5x2e3/qrC4zv 8qqxBUXRn+Gmjs585F/jeotvYZO6QI4pj1FtHuEzQ84i2w5MecBXFEWFJfKeqY9gC3u2 TcSQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:subject:to:references:from:organization :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KJ3vSGgyORrvU6rv7Vd/aRyYxs/h9/TJdjXOUcZUHdg=; b=kyXmKBjYwFgK0E2w9G1oxXgLajs3KsxtloYkKiikcvwkPZ+1dVwhYo2wNBN3TI9R6I xA8WzYfN037HodYJEEcvpLNJkRdbIPKXuRREzPuY4u/YNKrmlybQcH/jJX8FAMpID1bO wQrelhu8xmnWJS8sf3PCm/WYErd+3BcU1aAAUt3uUvjoyfMKvFsLaIN25yJOxZIeO9fa rM74Ve7cJ9fFNCoQaBF9SaqfmzwQwXM8HymPU0/F6AiGDTXCKJULsN4K8oNZbGc4EOHe Ka2apEibWGL0nsfvuIJvay9mYL5H7IS65ZPDu47CjORnJuoiURYYimG/de5fKbWAWvAC 2LVA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWvWZ2XWQnAEyaMHBuGFDiE/LKNzMNwvicgYKfqBONBTiSfA6k7 LtYcH86SxS0tBRLt4Tp46vTqAgxagnE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxmmwsxsPhKKvybZ7OoTCjJJefPEKhz5dNVQ551z/CnXZdi3hRDobh8ThZMftMCWsgitRK38w== X-Received: by 2002:adf:ba47:: with SMTP id t7mr24177086wrg.175.1559735501458; Wed, 05 Jun 2019 04:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a01:e35:8b63:dc30:c5ec:3696:b85c:3139? ([2a01:e35:8b63:dc30:c5ec:3696:b85c:3139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r131sm9514282wmf.4.2019.06.05.04.51.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Jun 2019 04:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH kernel_bpf] honor CAP_NET_ADMIN for BPF_PROG_LOAD To: Andreas Steinmetz , netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org References: <56c1f2f89428b49dad615fc13cc8c120d4ca4abf.camel@domdv.de> <1188fe85-d627-89d1-d56b-91011166f9c7@6wind.com> From: Nicolas Dichtel Organization: 6WIND Message-ID: Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 13:51:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: bpf-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org Le 05/06/2019 à 12:59, Andreas Steinmetz a écrit : [snip] > If there is a change for this to get accepted, sure, I'm willing to > submit this formally (need some advice, though). At least, you need to submit it without the RFC tag. RFC patches are not aimed to be merged. Regards, Nicolas