From: "Michal Koutný" <mkoutny@suse.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org,
yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org,
lizefan.x@bytedance.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
yosryahmed@google.com, sinquersw@gmail.com,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/9] cgroup: Eliminate the need for cgroup_mutex in proc_cgroup_show()
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2023 16:04:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ujaxujz3xczccobmiu2jxsstn3n7v4ly7vp72dqbgu5dyonrrw@nhzk7fhrpkkp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231017124546.24608-3-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1025 bytes --]
Hi.
I'd like this proc_cgroup_show de-contention.
(Provided the previous patch and this one can be worked out somehow.)
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:45:39PM +0000, Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
> They can ran successfully after implementing this change, with no RCU
> warnings in dmesg. It's worth noting that this change can also catch
> deleted cgroups, as demonstrated by running the following task at the
> same time:
Can those be other than v1 root cgroups? A suffix "(unmounted)" may be
more informative then.
(Non-zombie tasks prevent their cgroup removal, zombie tasks won't have
any non-trivial path rendered.)
> @@ -6256,7 +6256,7 @@ int proc_cgroup_show(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> if (!buf)
> goto out;
>
> - cgroup_lock();
> + rcu_read_lock();
What about the cgroup_path_ns_locked() that prints the path?
(I argue above that no non-trivial path is rendered but I'm not sure
whether rcu_read_lock() is sufficient sync wrt cgroup rmdir.)
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-17 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-17 12:45 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 0/9] bpf, cgroup: Add BPF support for cgroup1 hierarchy Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 1/9] cgroup: Make operations on the cgroup root_list RCU safe Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 13:20 ` Michal Koutný
2023-10-18 2:51 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-18 9:35 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-19 6:38 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-19 19:08 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-19 19:43 ` Waiman Long
2023-10-20 9:36 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-20 17:51 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-22 9:32 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-25 8:06 ` kernel test robot
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 2/9] cgroup: Eliminate the need for cgroup_mutex in proc_cgroup_show() Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 14:04 ` Michal Koutný [this message]
2023-10-18 3:12 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-18 9:38 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-19 6:39 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 3/9] cgroup: Add a new helper for cgroup1 hierarchy Yafang Shao
2023-10-18 9:44 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-19 6:41 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 4/9] bpf: Add a new kfunc " Yafang Shao
2023-10-18 9:40 ` Tejun Heo
2023-10-19 6:40 ` Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 5/9] selftests/bpf: Fix issues in setup_classid_environment() Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] selftests/bpf: Add parallel support for classid Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 7/9] selftests/bpf: Add a new cgroup helper get_classid_cgroup_id() Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 8/9] selftests/bpf: Add a new cgroup helper get_cgroup_hierarchy_id() Yafang Shao
2023-10-17 12:45 ` [RFC PATCH bpf-next v2 9/9] selftests/bpf: Add selftests for cgroup1 hierarchy Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ujaxujz3xczccobmiu2jxsstn3n7v4ly7vp72dqbgu5dyonrrw@nhzk7fhrpkkp \
--to=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=sinquersw@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
--cc=yosryahmed@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).