From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20AD8EE4993 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:06:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B29E8606FF; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:06:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org B29E8606FF X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTOd3vOsF6cW; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ash.osuosl.org (ash.osuosl.org [140.211.166.34]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCA0611C9; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:06:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 7BCA0611C9 Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by ash.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879F11BF2BD for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0C1611C9 for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:06:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 5D0C1611C9 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eTCGspkERqbV for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net (relay1-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.193]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 202CB606FF for ; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:06:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 202CB606FF Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0340240003; Tue, 22 Aug 2023 18:05:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 20:05:55 +0200 To: Andreas Dannenberg Message-ID: <20230822200555.1f725af7@windsurf> In-Reply-To: <20230822121407.414eb140@windsurf> References: <20230622160212.2063472-1-dannenberg@ti.com> <20230822121407.414eb140@windsurf> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-GND-Sasl: thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com X-Mailman-Original-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1692727558; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=eMmTiKmzzOcpgqAoUNhjtUz4Z64WqSscVHVXAfa+YEk=; b=XjZWZz9GxpaIp7+jFExV1MGUNjQNTtLblQ4GClJqDZVgkQM05tPsczJkFDD2IPf297SmgG AVqyKR3UTe7BctvBJox0iRPYXFa1X+fxHqSoGm7f2VJD6eoma8MSMs+3Pm4nEiV+ZVOHal YDgBzlrx4jFjoenGTxQXcVFlqvXmF0/rmYIYJgl+bzRrw4+c0T8yyi3akFPgpFrUMcsY0T xabS2z/WNvMKgnNZkYymfEVyYezw643X8c2Dr1+MVwm3zUsawg0UFBqYzgqCD98t1tk31w U1EgfmpNHoKbo4jlf593vdF2gdlT0oDN2sZgaBkZvpXWzevQUHPYqE450IG2rg== X-Mailman-Original-Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=gm1 header.b=XjZWZz9G Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v9 00/11] add support for TI's AM64x and AM62x boards X-BeenThere: buildroot@buildroot.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion and development of buildroot List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , From: Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Reply-To: Thomas Petazzoni Cc: Thomas Petazzoni , Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: buildroot-bounces@buildroot.org Sender: "buildroot" Hello Andreas, On Tue, 22 Aug 2023 12:14:07 +0200 Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot wrote: > So, I have just merged the first 5 patches of this series... but > actually in its v8 iteration because the v8 is the one that was still > pending in patchwork, and I realize only now that there was a v9. How > well, too late, I already pushed to our next branch, so any additional > change will have to be done on top of what's in the next branch. > > I'll therefore reply to the v8 patches that I have merged and explain > the numerous changes I did. Now that I have merged the first chunk of your v8. Could you rebase the remaining commits of your v9 on top of the latest next branch, take into account the comments received, and submit an updated v10, so that we can move forward with AM62/AM64 support? Thanks a lot! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, co-owner and CEO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering and training https://bootlin.com _______________________________________________ buildroot mailing list buildroot@buildroot.org https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot