c-std-porting.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Porting procmail to C99
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 22:18:49 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fse6ka12.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)

Is procmail still widely used?  It has its own non-autoconf build
configuration system, and it's not easily fixed because it assumes that
implicit function declarations are supported: sources with multiple
functions are compiled (but not linked), and those functions that
produce diagnostics are flagged as unsupported (or so I assume).

I'm inclined towards building procmail in C89 mode for Fedora.


             reply	other threads:[~2022-11-25 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-25 21:18 Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-11-25 22:14 ` Porting procmail to C99 Bruno Haible
2022-11-26  4:28   ` Fangrui Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fse6ka12.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=c-std-porting@lists.linux.dev \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).