All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	<linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"Hannes Reinecke" <hare@suse.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2019 14:54:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2c83d98-2012-13af-ab46-5a28303c0f87@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190712024726.1227-1-ming.lei@redhat.com>

在 12/07/2019 10:47, Ming Lei 写道:
> Hi,
> 
> Thomas mentioned:
>      "
>       That was the constraint of managed interrupts from the very beginning:
>      
>        The driver/subsystem has to quiesce the interrupt line and the associated
>        queue _before_ it gets shutdown in CPU unplug and not fiddle with it
>        until it's restarted by the core when the CPU is plugged in again.
>      "
> 
> But no drivers or blk-mq do that before one hctx becomes dead(all
> CPUs for one hctx are offline), and even it is worse, blk-mq stills tries
> to run hw queue after hctx is dead, see blk_mq_hctx_notify_dead().
> 
> This patchset tries to address the issue by two stages:
> 
> 1) add one new cpuhp state of CPUHP_AP_BLK_MQ_ONLINE
> 
> - mark the hctx as internal stopped, and drain all in-flight requests
> if the hctx is going to be dead.
> 
> 2) re-submit IO in the state of CPUHP_BLK_MQ_DEAD after the hctx becomes dead
> 
> - steal bios from the request, and resubmit them via generic_make_request(),
> then these IO will be mapped to other live hctx for dispatch
> 
> Please comment & review, thanks!
> 

Hi Ming,

FWIW, to me this series looks reasonable.

So you have plans to post an updated "[PATCH 0/9] blk-mq/scsi: convert 
private reply queue into blk_mq hw queue" then?

All the best,
John

> 
> Ming Lei (7):
>    blk-mq: add new state of BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED
>    blk-mq: add blk-mq flag of BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ
>    blk-mq: stop to handle IO before hctx's all CPUs become offline
>    blk-mq: add callback of .free_request
>    SCSI: implement .free_request callback
>    blk-mq: re-submit IO in case that hctx is dead
>    blk-mq: handle requests dispatched from IO scheduler in case that hctx
>      is dead
> 
>   block/blk-mq-debugfs.c     |   2 +
>   block/blk-mq-tag.c         |   2 +-
>   block/blk-mq-tag.h         |   2 +
>   block/blk-mq.c             | 147 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   block/blk-mq.h             |   3 +-
>   drivers/block/loop.c       |   2 +-
>   drivers/md/dm-rq.c         |   2 +-
>   drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c    |  13 ++++
>   include/linux/blk-mq.h     |  12 +++
>   include/linux/cpuhotplug.h |   1 +
>   10 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
> 
> 



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-16  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-12  2:47 [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug Ming Lei
2019-07-12  2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 1/7] blk-mq: add new state of BLK_MQ_S_INTERNAL_STOPPED Ming Lei
2019-07-12  2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 2/7] blk-mq: add blk-mq flag of BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ Ming Lei
2019-07-16  2:53   ` John Garry
2019-07-16  6:08     ` Ming Lei
2019-07-12  2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 3/7] blk-mq: stop to handle IO before hctx's all CPUs become offline Ming Lei
2019-07-12  9:03   ` Minwoo Im
2019-07-16  3:03   ` John Garry
2019-07-16  6:12     ` Ming Lei
2019-07-12  2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 4/7] blk-mq: add callback of .free_request Ming Lei
2019-07-12  2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 5/7] SCSI: implement .free_request callback Ming Lei
2019-07-12  2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 6/7] blk-mq: re-submit IO in case that hctx is dead Ming Lei
2019-07-12  2:47 ` [RFC PATCH 7/7] blk-mq: handle requests dispatched from IO scheduler " Ming Lei
2019-07-16  6:54 ` John Garry [this message]
2019-07-16  7:18   ` [RFC PATCH 0/7] blk-mq: improvement on handling IO during CPU hotplug Ming Lei
2019-07-16  8:13     ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c2c83d98-2012-13af-ab46-5a28303c0f87@huawei.com \
    --to=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.