All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
To: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>,
	"mcgrof@kernel.org" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: "cl@linux.com" <cl@linux.com>,
	"pmladek@suse.com" <pmladek@suse.com>,
	"mbenes@suse.cz" <mbenes@suse.cz>,
	"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"jeyu@kernel.org" <jeyu@kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-modules@vger.kernel.org" <linux-modules@vger.kernel.org>,
	"live-patching@vger.kernel.org" <live-patching@vger.kernel.org>,
	"atomlin@atomlin.com" <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
	"ghalat@redhat.com" <ghalat@redhat.com>,
	"allen.lkml@gmail.com" <allen.lkml@gmail.com>,
	"void@manifault.com" <void@manifault.com>,
	"joe@perches.com" <joe@perches.com>,
	"msuchanek@suse.de" <msuchanek@suse.de>,
	"oleksandr@natalenko.name" <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:44:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8f97323-fcaa-5316-df79-60fd91c837aa@csgroup.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220209170358.3266629-5-atomlin@redhat.com>



Le 09/02/2022 à 18:03, Aaron Tomlin a écrit :
> No functional change.
> 
> This patch migrates livepatch support (i.e. used during module
> add/or load and remove/or deletion) from core module code into
> kernel/module/livepatch.c. At the moment it contains code to
> persist Elf information about a given livepatch module, only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
> ---
>   include/linux/module.h    |   5 +-
>   kernel/module/Makefile    |   3 ++
>   kernel/module/internal.h  |  18 +++++++
>   kernel/module/livepatch.c |  80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   kernel/module/main.c      | 102 ++++----------------------------------
>   5 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 96 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 kernel/module/livepatch.c
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> index 1e135fd5c076..680b31ff57fa 100644
> --- a/include/linux/module.h
> +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> @@ -664,10 +664,7 @@ static inline bool module_requested_async_probing(struct module *module)
>   }
>   
>   #ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> -static inline bool is_livepatch_module(struct module *mod)
> -{
> -	return mod->klp;
> -}
> +bool is_livepatch_module(struct module *mod);

This change is wrong, build fails with it because is_livepatch_module() 
is nowhere defined.

You could move is_livepatch_module() to include/linux/livepatch.h but as 
a separate patch.

>   #else /* !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
>   static inline bool is_livepatch_module(struct module *mod)
>   {
> diff --git a/kernel/module/Makefile b/kernel/module/Makefile
> index 2902fc7d0ef1..ee20d864ad19 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/module/Makefile
> @@ -7,3 +7,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MODULES) += main.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_MODULE_DECOMPRESS) += decompress.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG) += signing.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORMAT) += signature.o
> +ifdef CONFIG_MODULES

CONFIG_LIVEPATCH depends on CONFIG_MODULES so this ifdef is not needed 
(See kernel/livepatch/Kconfig)

> +obj-$(CONFIG_LIVEPATCH) += livepatch.o
> +endif
> diff --git a/kernel/module/internal.h b/kernel/module/internal.h
> index 1cf5d6dabc97..d252e0af1c54 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/module/internal.h
> @@ -58,6 +58,24 @@ struct load_info {
>   
>   int mod_verify_sig(const void *mod, struct load_info *info);
>   
> +#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
> +int copy_module_elf(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info);
> +void free_module_elf(struct module *mod);
> +bool set_livepatch_module(struct module *mod);
> +#else /* !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> +static inline int copy_module_elf(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
> +{
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool set_livepatch_module(struct module *mod)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void free_module_elf(struct module *mod) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> +
>   #ifdef CONFIG_MODULE_DECOMPRESS
>   int module_decompress(struct load_info *info, const void *buf, size_t size);
>   void module_decompress_cleanup(struct load_info *info);
> diff --git a/kernel/module/livepatch.c b/kernel/module/livepatch.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7e9cf530c3f0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/kernel/module/livepatch.c

Checkpatch reports the following:

WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#80:
new file mode 100644

CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!mod->klp_info"
#109: FILE: kernel/module/livepatch.c:25:
+	if (mod->klp_info == NULL)

CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!mod->klp_info->sechdrs"
#119: FILE: kernel/module/livepatch.c:35:
+	if (mod->klp_info->sechdrs == NULL) {

CHECK: Comparison to NULL could be written "!mod->klp_info->secstrings"
#127: FILE: kernel/module/livepatch.c:43:
+	if (mod->klp_info->secstrings == NULL) {

CHECK: No space is necessary after a cast
#142: FILE: kernel/module/livepatch.c:58:
+	mod->klp_info->sechdrs[symndx].sh_addr = (unsigned long) 
mod->core_kallsyms.symtab;


> +inline bool set_livepatch_module(struct module *mod)

'inline' keyword is pointless here, as far as this function is in a .c 
and is not static, it won't be inlined.

Given how simple this function is, it should be a 'static inline' in 
internal.c

> +{
> +	mod->klp = true;
> +	return true;
> +}



> diff --git a/kernel/module/main.c b/kernel/module/main.c
> index 750e3ad28679..5f5bd7152b55 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/main.c
> +++ b/kernel/module/main.c

> @@ -3091,30 +3016,23 @@ static int copy_chunked_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *usrc, unsigned l
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> -#ifdef CONFIG_LIVEPATCH
>   static int check_modinfo_livepatch(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
>   {
> -	if (get_modinfo(info, "livepatch")) {
> -		mod->klp = true;
> +	if (!get_modinfo(info, "livepatch"))
> +		/* Nothing more to do */
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (set_livepatch_module(mod)) {
>   		add_taint_module(mod, TAINT_LIVEPATCH, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
>   		pr_notice_once("%s: tainting kernel with TAINT_LIVEPATCH\n",
> -			       mod->name);
> -	}
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -#else /* !CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
> -static int check_modinfo_livepatch(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
> -{
> -	if (get_modinfo(info, "livepatch")) {
> -		pr_err("%s: module is marked as livepatch module, but livepatch support is disabled",
> -		       mod->name);
> -		return -ENOEXEC;
> +				mod->name);

This change seems wrong, mod->name must remain aligned to open parenthesis.


> +		return 0;
>   	}
>   
> -	return 0;
> +	pr_err("%s: module is marked as livepatch module, but livepatch support is disabled",
> +		mod->name);

CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#285: FILE: kernel/module/main.c:3033:
+	pr_err("%s: module is marked as livepatch module, but livepatch 
support is disabled",
+		mod->name);

> +	return -ENOEXEC;
>   }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_LIVEPATCH */
>   
>   static void check_modinfo_retpoline(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info)
>   {

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-10 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-09 17:03 [PATCH v5 00/13] module: core code clean up Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] module: Move all into module/ Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 11:11   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-10 14:45     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 17:02       ` Joe Perches
2022-02-10 17:22         ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 18:50         ` Luis Chamberlain
2022-02-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] module: Simple refactor in preparation for split Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 11:18   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-10 16:26     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] module: Make internal.h more compliant Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 11:20   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] module: Move livepatch support to a separate file Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-09 18:51   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-10 11:44   ` Christophe Leroy [this message]
2022-02-10 17:20     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] module: Move latched RB-tree " Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 12:03   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-10 22:41     ` Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-09 17:03 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] module: Move strict rwx " Aaron Tomlin
2022-02-10 12:21   ` Christophe Leroy
2022-02-11 11:09     ` Aaron Tomlin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c8f97323-fcaa-5316-df79-60fd91c837aa@csgroup.eu \
    --to=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=allen.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=atomlin@atomlin.com \
    --cc=atomlin@redhat.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=ghalat@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-modules@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=void@manifault.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.