From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
djwong@kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, cluster-devel@redhat.com,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, logfs@logfs.org,
linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org,
linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-afs@lists.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] lockdep: teach lockdep about memalloc_noio_save
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:14:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170306131408.9828-2-mhocko@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170306131408.9828-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
From: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Commit 21caf2fc1931 ("mm: teach mm by current context info to not do I/O
during memory allocation") added the memalloc_noio_(save|restore) functions
to enable people to modify the MM behavior by disabling I/O during memory
allocation. This was further extended in Fixes: 934f3072c17c ("mm: clear
__GFP_FS when PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO is set"). memalloc_noio_* functions prevent
allocation paths recursing back into the filesystem without explicitly
changing the flags for every allocation site. However, lockdep hasn't been
keeping up with the changes and it entirely misses handling the memalloc_noio
adjustments. Instead, it is left to the callers of __lockdep_trace_alloc to
call the function after they have shaven the respective GFP flags which
can lead to false positives:
[ 644.173373] =================================
[ 644.174012] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[ 644.174012] 4.10.0-nbor #134 Not tainted
[ 644.174012] ---------------------------------
[ 644.174012] inconsistent {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} -> {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} usage.
[ 644.174012] fsstress/3365 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[ 644.174012] (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++?.}, at: [<ffffffff8136f231>] xfs_ilock+0x141/0x230
[ 644.174012] {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} state was registered at:
[ 644.174012] __lock_acquire+0x62a/0x17c0
[ 644.174012] lock_acquire+0xc5/0x220
[ 644.174012] down_write_nested+0x4f/0x90
[ 644.174012] xfs_ilock+0x141/0x230
[ 644.174012] xfs_reclaim_inode+0x12a/0x320
[ 644.174012] xfs_reclaim_inodes_ag+0x2c8/0x4e0
[ 644.174012] xfs_reclaim_inodes_nr+0x33/0x40
[ 644.174012] xfs_fs_free_cached_objects+0x19/0x20
[ 644.174012] super_cache_scan+0x191/0x1a0
[ 644.174012] shrink_slab+0x26f/0x5f0
[ 644.174012] shrink_node+0xf9/0x2f0
[ 644.174012] kswapd+0x356/0x920
[ 644.174012] kthread+0x10c/0x140
[ 644.174012] ret_from_fork+0x31/0x40
[ 644.174012] irq event stamp: 173777
[ 644.174012] hardirqs last enabled at (173777): [<ffffffff8105b440>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x70/0xc0
[ 644.174012] hardirqs last disabled at (173775): [<ffffffff8105b407>] __local_bh_enable_ip+0x37/0xc0
[ 644.174012] softirqs last enabled at (173776): [<ffffffff81357e2a>] _xfs_buf_find+0x67a/0xb70
[ 644.174012] softirqs last disabled at (173774): [<ffffffff81357d8b>] _xfs_buf_find+0x5db/0xb70
[ 644.174012]
[ 644.174012] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 644.174012] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 644.174012]
[ 644.174012] CPU0
[ 644.174012] ----
[ 644.174012] lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
[ 644.174012] <Interrupt>
[ 644.174012] lock(&xfs_nondir_ilock_class);
[ 644.174012]
[ 644.174012] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ 644.174012]
[ 644.174012] 4 locks held by fsstress/3365:
[ 644.174012] #0: (sb_writers#10){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff81208d04>] mnt_want_write+0x24/0x50
[ 644.174012] #1: (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8120ea2f>] vfs_setxattr+0x6f/0xb0
[ 644.174012] #2: (sb_internal#2){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff8138185c>] xfs_trans_alloc+0xfc/0x140
[ 644.174012] #3: (&xfs_nondir_ilock_class){++++?.}, at: [<ffffffff8136f231>] xfs_ilock+0x141/0x230
[ 644.174012]
[ 644.174012] stack backtrace:
[ 644.174012] CPU: 0 PID: 3365 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 4.10.0-nbor #134
[ 644.174012] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Ubuntu-1.8.2-1ubuntu1 04/01/2014
[ 644.174012] Call Trace:
[ 644.174012] dump_stack+0x85/0xc9
[ 644.174012] print_usage_bug.part.37+0x284/0x293
[ 644.174012] ? print_shortest_lock_dependencies+0x1b0/0x1b0
[ 644.174012] mark_lock+0x27e/0x660
[ 644.174012] mark_held_locks+0x66/0x90
[ 644.174012] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x6f/0xd0
[ 644.174012] kmem_cache_alloc_node_trace+0x3a/0x2c0
[ 644.174012] ? vm_map_ram+0x2a1/0x510
[ 644.174012] vm_map_ram+0x2a1/0x510
[ 644.174012] ? vm_map_ram+0x46/0x510
[ 644.174012] _xfs_buf_map_pages+0x77/0x140
[ 644.174012] xfs_buf_get_map+0x185/0x2a0
[ 644.174012] xfs_attr_rmtval_set+0x233/0x430
[ 644.174012] xfs_attr_leaf_addname+0x2d2/0x500
[ 644.174012] xfs_attr_set+0x214/0x420
[ 644.174012] xfs_xattr_set+0x59/0xb0
[ 644.174012] __vfs_setxattr+0x76/0xa0
[ 644.174012] __vfs_setxattr_noperm+0x5e/0xf0
[ 644.174012] vfs_setxattr+0xae/0xb0
[ 644.174012] ? __might_fault+0x43/0xa0
[ 644.174012] setxattr+0x15e/0x1a0
[ 644.174012] ? __lock_is_held+0x53/0x90
[ 644.174012] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x93/0xa0
[ 644.174012] ? rcu_sync_lockdep_assert+0x2f/0x60
[ 644.174012] ? __sb_start_write+0x130/0x1d0
[ 644.174012] ? mnt_want_write+0x24/0x50
[ 644.174012] path_setxattr+0x8f/0xc0
[ 644.174012] SyS_lsetxattr+0x11/0x20
[ 644.174012] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0xc6
Let's fix this by making lockdep explicitly do the shaving of respective
GFP flags.
Fixes: 934f3072c17c ("mm: clear __GFP_FS when PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO is set")
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 12e38c213b70..25c33dcd86d7 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h>
#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
#include <linux/sched/task.h>
+#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
@@ -2863,6 +2864,8 @@ static void __lockdep_trace_alloc(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned long flags)
if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
return;
+ gfp_mask = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask);
+
/* no reclaim without waiting on it */
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM))
return;
@@ -3854,7 +3857,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lock_unpin_lock);
void lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_t gfp_mask)
{
- current->lockdep_reclaim_gfp = gfp_mask;
+ current->lockdep_reclaim_gfp = memalloc_noio_flags(gfp_mask);
}
void lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state(void)
--
2.11.0
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-06 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-06 13:14 [PATCH 0/7 v5] scope GFP_NOFS api Michal Hocko
2017-03-06 13:14 ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2017-03-06 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] lockdep: allow to disable reclaim lockup detection Michal Hocko
2017-03-06 13:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] xfs: abstract PF_FSTRANS to PF_MEMALLOC_NOFS Michal Hocko
2017-03-06 13:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: introduce memalloc_nofs_{save, restore} API Michal Hocko
2017-03-06 21:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] mm: introduce memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} API Andrew Morton
2017-03-07 15:09 ` Michal Hocko
2017-03-09 11:42 ` David Sterba
2017-03-06 13:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] xfs: use memalloc_nofs_{save,restore} instead of memalloc_noio* Michal Hocko
2017-03-06 13:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] jbd2: mark the transaction context with the scope GFP_NOFS context Michal Hocko
2017-03-06 13:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] jbd2: make the whole kjournald2 kthread NOFS safe Michal Hocko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170306131408.9828-2-mhocko@kernel.org \
--to=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-afs@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logfs@logfs.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
--cc=nborisov@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).