From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/18] ceph: set S_ENCRYPTED bit if new inode has encryption.ctx xattr
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 21:57:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908045737.GK68127@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200904160537.76663-13-jlayton@kernel.org>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:05:31PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> This hack fixes a chicken-and-egg problem when fetching inodes from the
> server. Once we move to a dedicated field in the inode, then this should
> be able to go away.
To clarify: while this *could* be the permanent solution, you're planning to
make ceph support storing an "is inode encrypted?" flag on the server, similar
to what the local filesystems do with i_flags (since searching the xattrs for
every inode is much more expensive than a simple flag check)?
> +#define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(fsc) ((fsc)->dummy_enc_ctx.ctx != NULL)
> +
As I mentioned on an earlier patch, please put the support for the
"test_dummy_encryption" mount option in a separate patch. It's best thought of
separately from the basic fscrypt support.
> int ceph_fscrypt_set_ops(struct super_block *sb);
> int ceph_fscrypt_prepare_context(struct inode *dir, struct inode *inode,
> struct ceph_acl_sec_ctx *as);
>
> #else /* CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION */
>
> +#define DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(fsc) (0)
> +
> static inline int ceph_fscrypt_set_ops(struct super_block *sb)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/inode.c b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> index 651148194316..c1c1fe2547f9 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/inode.c
> @@ -964,6 +964,10 @@ int ceph_fill_inode(struct inode *inode, struct page *locked_page,
> ceph_forget_all_cached_acls(inode);
> ceph_security_invalidate_secctx(inode);
> xattr_blob = NULL;
> + if ((inode->i_state & I_NEW) &&
> + (DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED(mdsc->fsc) ||
> + ceph_inode_has_xattr(ci, CEPH_XATTR_NAME_ENCRYPTION_CONTEXT)))
> + inode_set_flags(inode, S_ENCRYPTED, S_ENCRYPTED);
The check for DUMMY_ENCRYPTION_ENABLED() here is wrong and should be removed.
When the filesystem is mounted with test_dummy_encryption, there may be
unencrypted inodes already on-disk. Those shouldn't get S_ENCRYPTED set.
test_dummy_encryption does add some special handling for unencrypted
directories, but that doesn't require S_ENCRYPTED to be set on them.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-08 4:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-04 16:05 [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/18] vfs: export new_inode_pseudo Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:38 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 11:27 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 22:31 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 10:47 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 16:12 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 16:51 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 18:49 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 19:24 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/18] fscrypt: drop unused inode argument from fscrypt_fname_alloc_buffer Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/18] fscrypt: export fscrypt_d_revalidate Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/18] fscrypt: add fscrypt_new_context_from_inode Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:48 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 11:29 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 12:29 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 22:34 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/18] fscrypt: don't balk when inode is already marked encrypted Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:52 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 12:54 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 23:08 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/18] fscrypt: move nokey_name conversion to separate function and export it Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:55 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 12:50 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 22:53 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 16:02 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/18] lib: lift fscrypt base64 conversion into lib/ Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 3:59 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 12:51 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/18] ceph: add fscrypt ioctls Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/18] ceph: crypto context handling for ceph Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 4:29 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 16:14 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/18] ceph: preallocate inode for ops that may create one Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/18] ceph: add routine to create context prior to RPC Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 4:43 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/18] ceph: set S_ENCRYPTED bit if new inode has encryption.ctx xattr Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 4:57 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2020-09-09 12:20 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 15:53 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 16:33 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 17:19 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/18] ceph: make ceph_msdc_build_path use ref-walk Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/18] ceph: add encrypted fname handling to ceph_mdsc_build_path Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 5:06 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 12:24 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/18] ceph: make d_revalidate call fscrypt revalidator for encrypted dentries Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 5:12 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 12:26 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-09 16:18 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/18] ceph: add support to readdir for encrypted filenames Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 5:34 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-09 13:02 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/18] ceph: add fscrypt support to ceph_fill_trace Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:05 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/18] ceph: create symlinks with encrypted and base64-encoded targets Jeff Layton
2020-09-04 16:11 ` Jeff Layton
2020-09-08 5:43 ` Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Eric Biggers
2020-09-08 12:09 ` Jeff Layton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200908045737.GK68127@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).