From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395A3C43461 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 05:54:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B982137B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 05:54:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599544490; bh=VvQRUqCEumUrjB1eL6fGK/9AS3T4qWtdbK1Y+v5BDek=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=1O19ht43v4SMk4TJ9agPv6GGBqeRM7HM+cYZVBV9WIATAOvGJ9faQxN40LoG2Fi0B KiPBUB39K0I9/iMx1sRhq7OpMms6frGKx+gIWid0lByYZxqmwPK9MuOmw0yP6dbzVk z71aEdmgXUjekq8pGF7vYB8QiJqaP/RN5N1kKyi8= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728852AbgIHFyt (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 01:54:49 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:47306 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728531AbgIHFys (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2020 01:54:48 -0400 Received: from sol.localdomain (172-10-235-113.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [172.10.235.113]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 40B482137B; Tue, 8 Sep 2020 05:54:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1599544488; bh=VvQRUqCEumUrjB1eL6fGK/9AS3T4qWtdbK1Y+v5BDek=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Y48O9cyOyoz3Qp3v+QBDf8anbyuYYQUtBXPfl5qboMnFu/9pTDu0XOr1Pu6vr7JGT G4vXb/UQVcCAN8JHgyNZU+Isxl6uLMPJIbYfNpnna/+cTk/jb/Bvj7dcMRvS0xfOpm fFN8ex7NYa0CEeZTJgucmPv7RAnGxNgcDwbt/gZ0= Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2020 22:54:46 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Jeff Layton Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/18] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Message-ID: <20200908055446.GP68127@sol.localdomain> References: <20200904160537.76663-1-jlayton@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200904160537.76663-1-jlayton@kernel.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 12:05:19PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > This is a second posting of the ceph+fscrypt integration work that I've > been experimenting with. The main change with this patch is that I've > based this on top of Eric's fscrypt-pending set. That necessitated a > change to allocate inodes much earlier than we have traditionally, prior > to sending an RPC instead of waiting on the reply. FWIW, if possible you should create a git tag or branch for your patchset. While just the mailed patches work fine for *me* for this particular patchset, other people may not be able to figure out what the patchset applies to. (In particular, it depends on another patchset: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200824061712.195654-1-ebiggers@kernel.org) > Note that this just covers the crypto contexts and filenames. I've also > added a patch to encrypt symlink contents as well, but it doesn't seem to > be working correctly. What about symlink encryption isn't working correctly? - Eric