From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0869CC49361 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E671661209 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231491AbhFPIzS (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:55:18 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:51338 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231335AbhFPIzO (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 04:55:14 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (relay2.suse.de [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3785121A24; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:53:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1623833587; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oxGdDHsozXNdxVBcMTnfRLsug90r69T25ARBDtbntyA=; b=LsIoyQo3y3jZK6iYT6qpOHtEBnsukk3Vi+/RWO+92uZkR0q03c6TBQ0B5CU8KM+QrgFTs3 E8iil+lsQ0ADkqJyjlPsKpGDzT7V3B1ZwTbzwok6Utjw25vol8hEatNgGKqz0HDDDpVozi RBw73kTkulONM8nvb2UKyszzcHS4CwU= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1623833587; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=oxGdDHsozXNdxVBcMTnfRLsug90r69T25ARBDtbntyA=; b=Cd/rE56FeKGW7aufMXqVHJ9XF4xj24JOWYzVHMVZjsuoQRzk9nxMDxtS1jr5muCo1d29ir FblE0OV602i/3qDw== Received: from quack2.suse.cz (unknown [10.100.200.198]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687ABA3B9B; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 08:53:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D7E651F2C88; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:53:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 10:53:04 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Jan Kara , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Chinner , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Chao Yu , Damien Le Moal , "Darrick J. Wong" , Jaegeuk Kim , Jeff Layton , Johannes Thumshirn , linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Miklos Szeredi , Steve French , Ted Tso , Matthew Wilcox , Pavel Reichl , Dave Chinner , Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] xfs: Refactor xfs_isilocked() Message-ID: <20210616085304.GA28250@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20210615090844.6045-1-jack@suse.cz> <20210615091814.28626-7-jack@suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org On Wed 16-06-21 06:37:12, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 11:17:57AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > > From: Pavel Reichl > > > > Refactor xfs_isilocked() to use newly introduced __xfs_rwsem_islocked(). > > __xfs_rwsem_islocked() is a helper function which encapsulates checking > > state of rw_semaphores hold by inode. > > __xfs_rwsem_islocked doesn't seem to actually existing in any tree I > checked yet? __xfs_rwsem_islocked is introduced by this patch so I'm not sure what are you asking about... :) Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR