From: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
To: jlayton@redhat.com, pdonnell@redhat.com, xiubli@redhat.com
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/4] ceph: track average/stdev r/w/m latency
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 18:37:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210921130750.31820-3-vshankar@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210921130750.31820-1-vshankar@redhat.com>
Update the math involved to closely mimic how its done in
user land. This does not make a lot of difference to the
execution speed.
Signed-off-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
---
fs/ceph/metric.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
fs/ceph/metric.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ceph/metric.c b/fs/ceph/metric.c
index 226dc38e2909..ca758bff69ca 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/metric.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/metric.c
@@ -245,6 +245,7 @@ int ceph_metric_init(struct ceph_client_metric *m)
spin_lock_init(&m->read_metric_lock);
m->read_latency_sq_sum = 0;
+ m->avg_read_latency = 0;
m->read_latency_min = KTIME_MAX;
m->read_latency_max = 0;
m->total_reads = 0;
@@ -255,6 +256,7 @@ int ceph_metric_init(struct ceph_client_metric *m)
spin_lock_init(&m->write_metric_lock);
m->write_latency_sq_sum = 0;
+ m->avg_write_latency = 0;
m->write_latency_min = KTIME_MAX;
m->write_latency_max = 0;
m->total_writes = 0;
@@ -265,6 +267,7 @@ int ceph_metric_init(struct ceph_client_metric *m)
spin_lock_init(&m->metadata_metric_lock);
m->metadata_latency_sq_sum = 0;
+ m->avg_metadata_latency = 0;
m->metadata_latency_min = KTIME_MAX;
m->metadata_latency_max = 0;
m->total_metadatas = 0;
@@ -322,20 +325,25 @@ void ceph_metric_destroy(struct ceph_client_metric *m)
max = new; \
}
-static inline void __update_stdev(ktime_t total, ktime_t lsum,
- ktime_t *sq_sump, ktime_t lat)
+static inline void __update_latency(ktime_t *ctotal, ktime_t *lsum,
+ ktime_t *lavg, ktime_t *min, ktime_t *max,
+ ktime_t *sum_sq, ktime_t lat)
{
- ktime_t avg, sq;
+ ktime_t total, avg;
- if (unlikely(total == 1))
- return;
+ total = ++(*ctotal);
+ *lsum += lat;
+
+ METRIC_UPDATE_MIN_MAX(*min, *max, lat);
- /* the sq is (lat - old_avg) * (lat - new_avg) */
- avg = DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST((lsum - lat), (total - 1));
- sq = lat - avg;
- avg = DIV64_U64_ROUND_CLOSEST(lsum, total);
- sq = sq * (lat - avg);
- *sq_sump += sq;
+ if (unlikely(total == 1)) {
+ *lavg = lat;
+ *sum_sq = 0;
+ } else {
+ avg = *lavg + div64_s64(lat - *lavg, total);
+ *sum_sq += (lat - *lavg)*(lat - avg);
+ *lavg = avg;
+ }
}
void ceph_update_read_metrics(struct ceph_client_metric *m,
@@ -343,23 +351,18 @@ void ceph_update_read_metrics(struct ceph_client_metric *m,
unsigned int size, int rc)
{
ktime_t lat = ktime_sub(r_end, r_start);
- ktime_t total;
if (unlikely(rc < 0 && rc != -ENOENT && rc != -ETIMEDOUT))
return;
spin_lock(&m->read_metric_lock);
- total = ++m->total_reads;
m->read_size_sum += size;
- m->read_latency_sum += lat;
METRIC_UPDATE_MIN_MAX(m->read_size_min,
m->read_size_max,
size);
- METRIC_UPDATE_MIN_MAX(m->read_latency_min,
- m->read_latency_max,
- lat);
- __update_stdev(total, m->read_latency_sum,
- &m->read_latency_sq_sum, lat);
+ __update_latency(&m->total_reads, &m->read_latency_sum,
+ &m->avg_read_latency, &m->read_latency_min,
+ &m->read_latency_max, &m->read_latency_sq_sum, lat);
spin_unlock(&m->read_metric_lock);
}
@@ -368,23 +371,18 @@ void ceph_update_write_metrics(struct ceph_client_metric *m,
unsigned int size, int rc)
{
ktime_t lat = ktime_sub(r_end, r_start);
- ktime_t total;
if (unlikely(rc && rc != -ETIMEDOUT))
return;
spin_lock(&m->write_metric_lock);
- total = ++m->total_writes;
m->write_size_sum += size;
- m->write_latency_sum += lat;
METRIC_UPDATE_MIN_MAX(m->write_size_min,
m->write_size_max,
size);
- METRIC_UPDATE_MIN_MAX(m->write_latency_min,
- m->write_latency_max,
- lat);
- __update_stdev(total, m->write_latency_sum,
- &m->write_latency_sq_sum, lat);
+ __update_latency(&m->total_writes, &m->write_latency_sum,
+ &m->avg_write_latency, &m->write_latency_min,
+ &m->write_latency_max, &m->write_latency_sq_sum, lat);
spin_unlock(&m->write_metric_lock);
}
@@ -393,18 +391,13 @@ void ceph_update_metadata_metrics(struct ceph_client_metric *m,
int rc)
{
ktime_t lat = ktime_sub(r_end, r_start);
- ktime_t total;
if (unlikely(rc && rc != -ENOENT))
return;
spin_lock(&m->metadata_metric_lock);
- total = ++m->total_metadatas;
- m->metadata_latency_sum += lat;
- METRIC_UPDATE_MIN_MAX(m->metadata_latency_min,
- m->metadata_latency_max,
- lat);
- __update_stdev(total, m->metadata_latency_sum,
- &m->metadata_latency_sq_sum, lat);
+ __update_latency(&m->total_metadatas, &m->metadata_latency_sum,
+ &m->avg_metadata_latency, &m->metadata_latency_min,
+ &m->metadata_latency_max, &m->metadata_latency_sq_sum, lat);
spin_unlock(&m->metadata_metric_lock);
}
diff --git a/fs/ceph/metric.h b/fs/ceph/metric.h
index 103ed736f9d2..0af02e212033 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/metric.h
+++ b/fs/ceph/metric.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct ceph_client_metric {
u64 read_size_min;
u64 read_size_max;
ktime_t read_latency_sum;
+ ktime_t avg_read_latency;
ktime_t read_latency_sq_sum;
ktime_t read_latency_min;
ktime_t read_latency_max;
@@ -148,6 +149,7 @@ struct ceph_client_metric {
u64 write_size_min;
u64 write_size_max;
ktime_t write_latency_sum;
+ ktime_t avg_write_latency;
ktime_t write_latency_sq_sum;
ktime_t write_latency_min;
ktime_t write_latency_max;
@@ -155,6 +157,7 @@ struct ceph_client_metric {
spinlock_t metadata_metric_lock;
u64 total_metadatas;
ktime_t metadata_latency_sum;
+ ktime_t avg_metadata_latency;
ktime_t metadata_latency_sq_sum;
ktime_t metadata_latency_min;
ktime_t metadata_latency_max;
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-21 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-21 13:07 [PATCH v3 0/4] ceph: forward average read/write/metadata latency Venky Shankar
2021-09-21 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] ceph: use "struct ceph_timespec" for r/w/m latencies Venky Shankar
2021-09-21 13:07 ` Venky Shankar [this message]
2021-09-22 12:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ceph: track average/stdev r/w/m latency Jeff Layton
2021-09-22 12:33 ` Venky Shankar
2021-09-22 13:44 ` Venky Shankar
2021-09-22 14:34 ` Xiubo Li
2021-09-22 14:37 ` Xiubo Li
2021-09-22 17:10 ` Venky Shankar
2021-09-22 13:45 ` Xiubo Li
2021-09-21 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ceph: include average/stddev r/w/m latency in mds metrics Venky Shankar
2021-09-21 13:07 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ceph: use tracked average r/w/m latencies to display metrics in debugfs Venky Shankar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210921130750.31820-3-vshankar@redhat.com \
--to=vshankar@redhat.com \
--cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=pdonnell@redhat.com \
--cc=xiubli@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).