From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5A9C433E9 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C8864F04 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 12:54:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231331AbhCRMyI (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:54:08 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33898 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231279AbhCRMxn (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Mar 2021 08:53:43 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 980F9C06174A for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id g1so1258549plg.7 for ; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:53:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LERvXmZUMS1jrO2Qxw6NXr2FBx2xXa4mrMXNs8tOvNM=; b=amgzqYQnz2KlUEv02C5G22uLiYwr/i30+Q2VjcXVjF93iVSgALySZZtgCq2ZBGWwVE jhWyNZ6/oEvWnYVBpCG4ptOB2b+3GeV7PyKhHoEKXDvJO1zu2aJx3f1zSMKnOcRR+qbU 4TNpnYt1ADeFs1ACNpJ1o51iPMjPJZlgMjKED6JerYUZdrBT+GNrlA8aRDlIDsaLTkNt ukN0dEomPWfXMCSphGqaKwEWMvoUXmKZzACRl4T2ZwJxQz+X4Wj6i2GbUrCdVilNQVcq 39RHfMSRmy4x1ju+ko5/B/iEQHiLzVga6pDXcnQlziUb9QoNhpdxwHqcZ82tMtChzMdM loZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LERvXmZUMS1jrO2Qxw6NXr2FBx2xXa4mrMXNs8tOvNM=; b=b5tOHnGWW/SrghK1m9NpxzyAmoV3KDBwk5KivWTYvsEwReyRoyhZKMOe9GLLPFMhy0 E4Wd3aIAod676F4csYqf4k5rdzdfmyyA3hB6WfSdiKpoLc0SqX4vr321uH9uYDapF++q zlX5Lnr8G55U1jEtRlJhKKmAqr44Jz1g+1pxNobwnbS5bIWRRM2m583AlI4WewhnOvQH Q6+H9j1XNNX4nJZdJdhrJKrI/dYstO42yZ5JSWpLX4qwCglCi6tKNiAuFTOfc8at4Rsj Zh59//9FKykANg48GumuZj/aSYfXdOpSA4los0dye/6Fb79C/IZqs5lXEVkEIsZvy0Nh UI4A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mj2NwSYK9OaAMK8CAF9xvxn7ReOWkecQDRWn3tE/AEePpVInn GmXa6vB/3U4gYF8dhKItFtzzfJu283WQCaOHnBsrXcMclJQ5FQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxuduDiJaBtEUmkalbmX3VilAoKq/TNfDtyj7Jv18NTUZL1RC0K/6CJ38xvzLp+WUZtvtEooXxXjNsTRaGwa9w= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:f005:: with SMTP id bt5mr4335829pjb.127.1616072021997; Thu, 18 Mar 2021 05:53:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: WeiGuo Ren Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:53:28 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: rgw: Is rgw_sync_lease_period=120s set small? To: Ceph Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org radosgw-admin sync error list [ { "shard_id": 0, "entries": [ { "id": "1_1614333890.956965_8080774.1", "section": "data", "name": "user21-bucket23:multi_master-anna.1827103.323:54", "timestamp": "2021-02-26 10:04:50.956965Z", "info": { "source_zone": "multi_master-anna", "error_code": 125, "message": "failed to sync bucket instance: (125) Operation canceled" } } ] } ] I think this command should be used to determine its parameters, and keep increasing, as long as -ECANCLE=EF=BC=88125=EF=BC=89 does not appear, = it is appropriate. WeiGuo Ren =E4=BA=8E2021=E5=B9=B43=E6=9C=8818=E6= =97=A5=E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=887:37=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > > I have an osd ceph cluster, rgw instance often appears to be renewed > and not locked > > WeiGuo Ren =E4=BA=8E2021=E5=B9=B43=E6=9C=8818= =E6=97=A5=E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=887:35=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC= =9A > > > > In an rgw multi-site production environment, how many rgw instances > > will be started in a single zone? According to my test, multiple rgw > > instances will compete for the datalog leaselock, and it is very > > likely that the leaselock will not be renewed. Is the default > > rgw_sync_lease_period=3D120s a bit small?