ceph-devel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.de>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 20/19] ceph: make ceph_get_name decrypt filenames
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2021 12:14:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YGWrKxYOdWgrhOPp@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210331203520.65916-1-jlayton@kernel.org>

On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 04:35:20PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> When we do a lookupino to the MDS, we get a filename in the trace.
> ceph_get_name uses that name directly, so we must properly decrypt
> it before copying it to the name buffer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/ceph/export.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> This patch is what's needed to fix the "busy inodes after umount"
> issue I was seeing with xfstest generic/477, and also makes that
> test pass reliably with mounts using -o test_dummy_encryption.

You mentioned this issue the other day on IRC but I couldn't reproduce.

On the other hand, I'm seeing another issue.  Here's a way to reproduce:

- create an encrypted dir 'd' and create a file 'f'
- umount and mount the filesystem
- unlock dir 'd'
- cat d/f
  cat: d/2: No such file or directory

It happens _almost_ every time I do the umount+mount+unlock+cat.  Looks
like ceph_atomic_open() fails to see that directory as encrypted.  I don't
think the problem is on this open itself, but in the unlock because a
simple 'ls' also fails to show the decrypted names.  (On the other end, if
you do an 'ls' _before_ the unlock, everything seems to work fine.)

I didn't had time to dig deeper into this yet, but I don't remember seeing
this behaviour in previous versions of the patchset.

Cheers,
--
Luís

> 
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/export.c b/fs/ceph/export.c
> index 17d8c8f4ec89..f4e3a17ffc01 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/export.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/export.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
>  
>  #include "super.h"
>  #include "mds_client.h"
> +#include "crypto.h"
>  
>  /*
>   * Basic fh
> @@ -516,7 +517,9 @@ static int ceph_get_name(struct dentry *parent, char *name,
>  {
>  	struct ceph_mds_client *mdsc;
>  	struct ceph_mds_request *req;
> +	struct inode *dir = d_inode(parent);
>  	struct inode *inode = d_inode(child);
> +	struct ceph_mds_reply_info_parsed *rinfo;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	if (ceph_snap(inode) != CEPH_NOSNAP)
> @@ -528,29 +531,46 @@ static int ceph_get_name(struct dentry *parent, char *name,
>  	if (IS_ERR(req))
>  		return PTR_ERR(req);
>  
> -	inode_lock(d_inode(parent));
> -
> +	inode_lock(dir);
>  	req->r_inode = inode;
>  	ihold(inode);
>  	req->r_ino2 = ceph_vino(d_inode(parent));
> -	req->r_parent = d_inode(parent);
> +	req->r_parent = dir;
>  	set_bit(CEPH_MDS_R_PARENT_LOCKED, &req->r_req_flags);
>  	req->r_num_caps = 2;
>  	err = ceph_mdsc_do_request(mdsc, NULL, req);
> +	inode_unlock(dir);
>  
> -	inode_unlock(d_inode(parent));
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out;
>  
> -	if (!err) {
> -		struct ceph_mds_reply_info_parsed *rinfo = &req->r_reply_info;
> +	rinfo = &req->r_reply_info;
> +	if (!IS_ENCRYPTED(dir)) {
>  		memcpy(name, rinfo->dname, rinfo->dname_len);
>  		name[rinfo->dname_len] = 0;
> -		dout("get_name %p ino %llx.%llx name %s\n",
> -		     child, ceph_vinop(inode), name);
>  	} else {
> -		dout("get_name %p ino %llx.%llx err %d\n",
> -		     child, ceph_vinop(inode), err);
> -	}
> +		struct fscrypt_str oname = FSTR_INIT(NULL, 0);
> +		struct ceph_fname fname = { .dir	= dir,
> +					    .name	= rinfo->dname,
> +					    .ctext	= rinfo->altname,
> +					    .name_len	= rinfo->dname_len,
> +					    .ctext_len	= rinfo->altname_len };
> +
> +		err = ceph_fname_alloc_buffer(dir, &oname);
> +		if (err < 0)
> +			goto out;
>  
> +		err = ceph_fname_to_usr(&fname, NULL, &oname, NULL);
> +		if (!err) {
> +			memcpy(name, oname.name, oname.len);
> +			name[oname.len] = 0;
> +		}
> +		ceph_fname_free_buffer(dir, &oname);
> +	}
> +out:
> +	dout("get_name %p ino %llx.%llx err %d %s%s\n",
> +		     child, ceph_vinop(inode), err,
> +		     err ? "" : "name ", err ? "" : name);
>  	ceph_mdsc_put_request(req);
>  	return err;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-01 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26 17:32 [RFC PATCH v5 00/19] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 01/19] vfs: export new_inode_pseudo Jeff Layton
2021-04-08  1:08   ` Eric Biggers
2021-04-08 16:18     ` Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 02/19] fscrypt: export fscrypt_base64_encode and fscrypt_base64_decode Jeff Layton
2021-04-08  1:06   ` Eric Biggers
2021-04-08 16:22     ` Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 03/19] fscrypt: export fscrypt_fname_encrypt and fscrypt_fname_encrypted_size Jeff Layton
2021-04-08  1:19   ` Eric Biggers
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 04/19] fscrypt: add fscrypt_context_for_new_inode Jeff Layton
2021-04-08  1:21   ` Eric Biggers
2021-04-08 16:27     ` Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 05/19] ceph: crypto context handling for ceph Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 06/19] ceph: implement -o test_dummy_encryption mount option Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 07/19] ceph: preallocate inode for ops that may create one Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 08/19] ceph: add routine to create fscrypt context prior to RPC Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 09/19] ceph: make ceph_msdc_build_path use ref-walk Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 10/19] ceph: add encrypted fname handling to ceph_mdsc_build_path Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 11/19] ceph: decode alternate_name in lease info Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 12/19] ceph: send altname in MClientRequest Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 13/19] ceph: properly set DCACHE_NOKEY_NAME flag in lookup Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 14/19] ceph: make d_revalidate call fscrypt revalidator for encrypted dentries Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 15/19] ceph: add helpers for converting names for userland presentation Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 16/19] ceph: add fscrypt support to ceph_fill_trace Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 17/19] ceph: add support to readdir for encrypted filenames Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 18/19] ceph: create symlinks with encrypted and base64-encoded targets Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 17:32 ` [RFC PATCH v5 19/19] ceph: add fscrypt ioctls Jeff Layton
2021-04-06 15:38   ` Luis Henriques
2021-04-06 16:03     ` Jeff Layton
2021-04-06 16:24       ` Luis Henriques
2021-04-06 17:27         ` Jeff Layton
2021-04-06 18:04           ` Luis Henriques
2021-04-07 12:47             ` Jeff Layton
2021-03-26 18:38 ` [RFC PATCH v5 00/19] ceph+fscrypt: context, filename and symlink support Jeff Layton
2021-03-31 20:35 ` [RFC PATCH v5 20/19] ceph: make ceph_get_name decrypt filenames Jeff Layton
2021-04-01 11:14   ` Luis Henriques [this message]
2021-04-01 12:15     ` Jeff Layton
2021-04-01 13:05       ` Luis Henriques
2021-04-01 13:12         ` Jeff Layton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YGWrKxYOdWgrhOPp@suse.de \
    --to=lhenriques@suse.de \
    --cc=ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).