From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21AF5C433F5 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:02:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jabberwock.ucw.cz (jabberwock.ucw.cz [46.255.230.98]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web08.4629.1641891743336708989 for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 01:02:24 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=missing; spf=neutral (domain: denx.de, ip: 46.255.230.98, mailfrom: pavel@denx.de) Received: by jabberwock.ucw.cz (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 7BBF21C0B80; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:02:19 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:02:18 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Amy Fong Cc: Pavel Machek , cip-dev@lists.cip-project.org, nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp Subject: Re: [cip-dev] [PATCH 4.19.y-cip 1/6] Backport netfilter: nf_tables: autoload modules from the abort path Message-ID: <20220111090218.GA22781@amd> References: <16C8EE09FDEB733D.27414@lists.cip-project.org> <20220110175519.GA3396@duo.ucw.cz> <20220110180635.GB3396@duo.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wac7ysb48OaltWcw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) List-Id: X-Webhook-Received: from li982-79.members.linode.com [45.33.32.79] by aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org with HTTPS for ; Tue, 11 Jan 2022 09:02:25 -0000 X-Groupsio-URL: https://lists.cip-project.org/g/cip-dev/message/7442 --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > > Ok, let me take a look at the series. But... could you provide some > > > kind of explanation of what these are and why you want them in -cip? > > >=20 > > > These are not usual "hardware enablement" patches... > >=20 > > 0/6 email was not part of the thread, so I missed it in the first > > look. > >=20 > > I see it fixes sysbot report. > >=20 > > Do you have special loads where you are hitting these netfilter > > problems? Are similar fixes needed in 4.4 / 5.10? > > Would it make sense to get it fixed in -stable kernels? >=20 > We haven't been able to reproduce the issue but apparently it's being rep= roduced=20 > periodically. >=20 > The offending patch doesn't appear in linux-4.4.y-cip > linux-5.10.y-cip has the fix already. >=20 > Both patches were introduced in 5.5.0-rc5 Thank you for answers. Is there reason not to submit it to stable? You are describing it is as a bugfix, and Greg takes those. [Advantages are a) community review, b) less patches to maintain for us, c) bug fixed for everyone, not just us]. Best regards, Pavel --=20 DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany --wac7ysb48OaltWcw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAmHdR5oACgkQMOfwapXb+vJ14gCeNXvoGCUyW/m9XGTfXCXf9fob gNoAn0cJ2xdqVz0cR2PBpelfGrW3+4mU =fC/T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wac7ysb48OaltWcw--