From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B466C433FF for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650F320C01 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:56:00 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 650F320C01 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [132.227.104.7]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6TItipN015687; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from systeme.lip6.fr (systeme.lip6.fr [127.0.0.1]) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F9DD7790; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:55:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from isis.lip6.fr (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by systeme.lip6.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1727776D for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0214.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.214]) by isis.lip6.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x6TIte12019939 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:55:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (10.5.19.251.rfc1918.com [10.5.19.251]) by smtpgrave06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B62C800BAB1 for ; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay06.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58A818224D97; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:28:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: stove18_681e57aab8a60 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2302 Received: from XPS-9350 (cpe-23-242-196-136.socal.res.rr.com [23.242.196.136]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf18.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 29 Jul 2019 16:28:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <0b6936cb34ca0dcd76b155b9b38366e82b1376f0.camel@perches.com> From: Joe Perches To: Julia Lawall , Linus Torvalds , Kees Cook Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 09:28:34 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <7ab8957eaf9b0931a59eff6e2bd8c5169f2f6c41.1563841972.git.joe@perches.com> <66fcdbf607d7d0bea41edb39e5579d63b62b7d84.camel@perches.com> <0f3ba090dfc956f5651e6c7c430abdba94ddcb8b.camel@perches.com> <563222fbfdbb44daa98078db9d404972@AcuMS.aculab.com> User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-0ubuntu0.18.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, Sender e-mail whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:55:44 +0200 (CEST) X-Greylist: Delayed for 02:09:58 by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (isis.lip6.fr [132.227.60.2]); Mon, 29 Jul 2019 20:55:41 +0200 (CEST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 132.227.60.2 Cc: David Laight , cocci , LKML Subject: Re: [Cocci] [Fwd: [PATCH 1/2] string: Add stracpy and stracpy_pad mechanisms] X-BeenThere: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr Errors-To: cocci-bounces@systeme.lip6.fr On Mon, 2019-07-29 at 10:07 -0400, Julia Lawall wrote: > I see that stracpy is now in linux-next. Would it be reasonable to send > patches adding uses now? My preference would be to have: o A provably correct script If a small subset of possible conversions are skipped, that's fine. o As piecemeal patches cause a lot of churn, work for individual maintainers, and also are not universally applied, have that script run kernel-wide after an rc1 and applied all-at-once. _______________________________________________ Cocci mailing list Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci