[Cocci] [PATCH v5] coccicheck: Support search for SmPL scripts within selected directory hierarchy

[Cocci] [PATCH v5] coccicheck: Support search for SmPL scripts within selected directory hierarchy

[zhongshiqi]

*Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory to search
SmPL scripts.

*Start a corresponding file determination if it contains an acceptable
path.

Signed-off-by: zhongshiqi <zhong.shiqi@zte.com.cn>
---
Changes in v5:
	1:rewrite change description as an enumeration

Changes in v4:
	1:rewrite change description in another wording

Changes in v3:
	1:rewrite change description
	2:fix patch subject
	3:modify commit log

Changes in v2:
	1.fix patch subject according to the reply by Markus
	<Markus.Elfring@web.de>
	2.change description in “imperative mood”
 
 scripts/coccicheck | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/coccicheck b/scripts/coccicheck
index e04d328..a1c4197 100755
--- a/scripts/coccicheck
+++ b/scripts/coccicheck
@@ -257,6 +257,10 @@ if [ "$COCCI" = "" ] ; then
     for f in `find $srctree/scripts/coccinelle/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do
 	coccinelle $f
     done
+elif [ -d "$COCCI" ] ; then
+    for f in `find $COCCI/ -name '*.cocci' -type f | sort`; do
+	coccinelle $f
+    done
 else
     coccinelle $COCCI
 fi
-- 
2.9.5

_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v5] coccicheck: Support search for SmPL scripts within selected directory hierarchy

[Markus Elfring]

I got the impression that you are struggling with difficulties (for unknown reasons)
around adding space characters at some places.
How would you like to improve this situation?


> *Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory to search
> SmPL scripts.
>
> *Start a corresponding file determination if it contains an acceptable
> path.

* Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory
  to search SmPL scripts.

* Start a corresponding file determination if it contains
  an acceptable path.


Would you like to update the provided software documentation together with
the small extension of this bash script?

Update candidates:
* https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?id=23fdb198ae81f47a574296dab5167c5e136a02ba#n189

* https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck#controlling_which_files_are_processed_by_coccinelle


> ---

‣ Would you find the patch change log sufficient without the information
  “Changes in”?

‣ I find the specification “1:” unnecessary before a single description item.

Regards,
Markus
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci

Re: [Cocci] [PATCH v5] coccicheck: Support search for SmPL scripts withinselected directory hierarchy

[zhong.shiqi]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1376 bytes --]

> I got the impression that you are struggling with difficulties (for unknown reasons)
> around adding space characters at some places.
> How would you like to improve this situation?

Thanks for your concern,but i haven't struggled with anything.I think i'm used to
adding space characters.


> > *Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory to search
> > SmPL scripts.
> > 
> > *Start a corresponding file determination if it contains an acceptable
> > path.
> 
> * Allow defining the environment variable “COCCI” as a directory
>   to search SmPL scripts.
> 
> * Start a corresponding file determination if it contains
>   an acceptable path.
> 
> 
> Would you like to update the provided software documentation together with
> the small extension of this bash script?
> 
> Update candidates:
> * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/dev-tools/coccinelle.rst?id=23fdb198ae81f47a574296dab5167c5e136a02ba#n189
> 
> * https://bottest.wiki.kernel.org/coccicheck#controlling_which_files_are_processed_by_coccinelle
> 
> 
> > ---
> 
> ‣ Would you find the patch change log sufficient without the information
>   “Changes in”?
> 
> ‣ I find the specification “1:” unnecessary before a single description item.
> 
> Regards,
> Markus

OK,i am understand. You are rigorous.

thanks,
Zhong.shiqi

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 136 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci