From: <wen.yang99@zte.com.cn>
To: <Markus.Elfring@web.de>
Cc: wang.yi59@zte.com.cn, michal.lkml@markovi.net,
nicolas.palix@imag.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [4/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Extend when constraints for twoSmPL ellipses
Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 17:18:58 +0800 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201905141718583344787@zte.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b13fa7ea-5721-0c67-d7d6-9e245c0ea007@web.de>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1586 bytes --]
> Subject: Re: [4/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Extend when constraints for twoSmPL ellipses
> >> Can you agree to any information which I presented in the commit message?
>
> Do you find this description inappropriate?
>
>
> >>> You don't need so many type metavariables.
> >>
> >> It seems that the Coccinelle software can cope also with my SmPL code addition.
> >> You might feel uncomfortable with the suggested changes for a while.
> >
> > It's ugly. Much more ugly than msg =
>
> The clarification of this change reluctance might become more interesting.
> I got convinced that there is a need for further software updates.
>
>
> >> * Can it become required to identify involved source code placeholders
> >> by extra metavariables?
> >
> > I don't understand the question.
>
> Wen Yang was planning a corresponding modification since 2019-02-19.
> https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/201902191014156680299@zte.com.cn/
> https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-February/005620.html
>
Hi Markus,
I did another experiment at that time and found that this modification will
reduce the false positive rate, but it may also reduce the recall rate.
Could we use it to find out as many bugs as possible in the current kernel
and then modify it?
https://systeme.lip6.fr/pipermail/cocci/2019-February/005626.html
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Wen
>
> I got into the development mood to contribute another concrete update suggestion
> for an open issue in affected scripts for the semantic patch language.
> Do you recognise the need for the extension of exclusion specifications here?
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 136 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-14 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-23 6:14 [Cocci] [PATCH] coccinelle: put_device: reduce false positives Wen Yang
2019-03-23 13:41 ` Julia Lawall
2019-03-23 19:44 ` Markus Elfring
2019-03-23 20:06 ` Julia Lawall
2019-03-26 8:45 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-03-26 9:38 ` Julia Lawall
2019-03-26 10:11 ` Dan Carpenter
2019-03-26 10:15 ` Julia Lawall
2019-03-28 13:08 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-03-28 14:19 ` Julia Lawall
2019-04-01 6:44 ` [Cocci] Coccinelle: " Markus Elfring
2019-04-01 20:04 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-13 8:55 ` [Cocci] [PATCH 0/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Adjustments for a SmPL script Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 8:59 ` [Cocci] [PATCH 1/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Adjust a message construction Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 9:35 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-13 11:33 ` [Cocci] [1/5] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 11:36 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-13 12:48 ` Markus Elfring
2019-07-06 13:13 ` [Cocci] [PATCH 1/5] " Masahiro Yamada
2019-05-13 9:01 ` [Cocci] [PATCH 2/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Add a cast to an expression for an assignment Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 9:33 ` Julia Lawall
2019-07-06 13:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
2019-05-13 9:05 ` [Cocci] [PATCH 3/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Merge four SmPL when constraints into one Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 9:32 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-13 11:48 ` [Cocci] [3/5] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 11:48 ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 11:51 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-13 12:52 ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 9:07 ` [Cocci] [PATCH 4/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Extend when constraints for two SmPL ellipses Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 9:31 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-13 12:22 ` [Cocci] [4/5] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-14 5:55 ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-14 6:52 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-14 7:49 ` Markus Elfring
2019-05-14 9:18 ` wen.yang99 [this message]
2019-05-14 9:51 ` [Cocci] [4/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Extend when constraints for twoSmPL ellipses Markus Elfring
2019-05-14 7:49 ` [Cocci] [4/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Extend when constraints for two SmPL ellipses Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 9:07 ` [Cocci] [PATCH 4/5] " Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 9:10 ` [Cocci] [PATCH 5/5] Coccinelle: put_device: Merge two SmPL when constraints into one Markus Elfring
2019-05-13 9:30 ` Julia Lawall
2019-05-13 12:35 ` [Cocci] [5/5] " Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201905141718583344787@zte.com.cn \
--to=wen.yang99@zte.com.cn \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=wang.yi59@zte.com.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).