cocci.inria.fr archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
	Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>
Cc: cocci@inria.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de
Subject: [cocci] coccinelle: How to remove a return at the end of a void function?
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2022 12:56:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20221224115657.kqyocti356cwm7hc@pengutronix.de> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2872 bytes --]

Hello,

I work on a patch set that eventually makes the function
rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove() return void:

A simplified spatch looks as follows:

-------->8--------
virtual patch

@p1@
identifier pdev;
@@
-int
+void
 rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
 <...
-return 0;
+return;
 ...>
 }
-------->8--------

This results in:

-------->8--------
diff -u -p a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
@@ -1379,13 +1379,13 @@ static int rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_probe(stru
        return 0;
 }

-static int rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static void rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
        struct rtsx_usb_sdmmc *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
        struct mmc_host *mmc;

        if (!host)
-               return 0;
+               return;

        mmc = host->mmc;
        host->host_removal = true;
@@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ static int rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove(str
        dev_dbg(&(pdev->dev),
                ": Realtek USB SD/MMC module has been removed\n");

-       return 0;
+       return;
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
-------->8--------

which is as intended. Now I want to remove the useless "return;" at the
end of the function, however adding

-------->8--------
@p2 depends on p1@
identifier pdev;
@@
 void rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) {
 ...
-return;
 }
-------->8--------

to the spatch doesn't (only) do the intended:

-------->8--------
diff -u -p a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c
@@ -1379,13 +1379,13 @@ static int rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_probe(stru
        return 0;
 }

-static int rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+static void rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
        struct rtsx_usb_sdmmc *host = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
        struct mmc_host *mmc;

        if (!host)
-               return 0;
+               {}

        mmc = host->mmc;
        host->host_removal = true;
@@ -1415,8 +1415,6 @@ static int rtsx_usb_sdmmc_drv_remove(str

        dev_dbg(&(pdev->dev),
                ": Realtek USB SD/MMC module has been removed\n");
-
-       return 0;
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_PM
-------->8--------

It's obvious to me, why coccinelle also removes the first return, but
it's not obvious to me, how to prevent this and only drop the 2nd one.

Do you have a hint for me?

Thanks in advance and happy holidays,
Uwe


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2022-12-24 12:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-24 11:56 Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2022-12-24 12:28 ` [cocci] coccinelle: How to remove a return at the end of a void function? Julia Lawall
2022-12-25 21:20   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-12-26 16:02     ` Julia Lawall
2022-12-27  9:55       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2022-12-27 11:26         ` Julia Lawall
2022-12-27 11:54           ` Uwe Kleine-König

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20221224115657.kqyocti356cwm7hc@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=cocci@inria.fr \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).