Coccinelle archive on
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Markus Elfring <>
To: Coccinelle <>
Subject: [Cocci] Checking data processing around invalidate_aliases()
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 10:12:32 +0100
Message-ID: <> (raw)


I would like to clarify the following source code analysis result.

elfring@Sonne:~/Projekte/Linux/next-patched> spatch -D report scripts/coccinelle/api/d_find_alias.cocci fs/ceph/caps.c
fs/ceph/caps.c:3051:9-11: Missing call to dput() at line 3063.

I have got the impression that a false positive is reported for
the implementation of the function “invalidate_aliases”.

How do you think about it?

Cocci mailing list

                 reply index

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Coccinelle archive on

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror cocci/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 cocci cocci/ \
	public-inbox-index cocci

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone